Vancouver, Monday,

August 18th 2008
Left of what? Left of Centre?

by Betty Krawczyk
That’s how Vision, a Municipal Political Party of Vancouver is being described, by themselves, and by the media, as left of centre. My question is: how can any political party be described as left of centre when it is seventy per cent funded by developers and corporations?  But this question is never raised by our only two daily print newspapers, The Vancouver Sun and the Province.  Both newspapers are owned by the Asper family of Winnipeg.

Okay, if only one family who lives in Winnipeg owns the only two daily print newspapers in Vancouver, (the family owns CanWest, the largest media conglomerate in Canada) what are the politics of this family, that is, the way they slant the news ?   Decidedly right wing.  That is, the usual right wing messages advocating the privatizing of everything public, including health care.  All in a reasonable tone, of course.  And the Aspers have already elected Gregor Robertson of Vision as the next mayor of Vancouver.  How have they done this?  By getting Gregor Robinson out there, at every opportunity, front and centre. in their newspapers.  And never even mentioning the fact that I, too, am running for mayor of Vancouver.

The Aspers obviously consider the fact that a little old lady environmental activist running for mayor as completely unworthy of mention.  Or, the other possibility is that I present some kind of a threat.   Because here’s an odd thing.  In my role as an environmental activist, both papers have covered my activities.   But as soon as I’m out of prison and announce that I’m running for mayor of Vancouver there is absolute silence.  The Vancouver Sun and the Province have never heard of me.  And furthermore, they have no intention of hearing my name or seeing my face.  Wouldn’t you agree that this is odd?  Wouldn’t you think that the only two local daily print newspapers would at lest mention that I, too, am running for mayor of Vancouver?  Especially since there is only one other declared candidate for mayor (besides myself), Peter Ladner of NPA?  And they do report on Mr. Ladner?  I would even feel that the Aspers were fulfilling some kind of civic responsibility to their readers if,  when discussing the mayoral race in an article, they  just tossed a throw away line at the bottom by adding : and oh yes, and  Betty Krawczyk is also running for mayor.  But not even this footnote.

The fact that there is not even a footnote makes me suspicious.  Could the Aspers really be afraid of me?  Of what I represent?  Which is public resistance to their corporate agenda and value systems?  If so, what right have they to pick the next mayor of Vancouver, one whom they consider to be more amenable to their ring wing agendas?   To do this by endorsing a nice man with a soft image and calling his seventy per cent corporate and developer funded party left of centre?  And the Aspers don’t even live in British Columbia.  Oh, money is a powerful thing!

If one bluntly questioned the Aspers about this they would probably reply that they have a right to say what they please and ignore what they please as they own the newspapers.  But I say they have a responsibility to the public as owners of the only two local print dailies in Vancouver to report the news, what is actually happening, not ignore what displeases them.  I say, just print the news, you Asper family of the Vancouver Sun and the Province.  And part of the news concerning the mayoral candidate race in Vancouver is that Betty Krawczyk is also a candidate and she is running under the auspices of The Work Less Party.  You don’t like that?  You’re afraid of it?  Better to ignore it?  Beneath your notice?

Ah, but you have a public obligation, you Aspers. You have an obligation to print names of declared candidates and legal municipal parties who have declared.  In fact, I think there may even be some legal obligation here to do so.   Just mentioning this as a foot note.

Betty Krawczyk

Blog: http://bettysearlyedition.blogspot.com/

For more information contact:

Betty Krawczyk
Mayoral Candidate, City of Vancouver
www.worklessparty.org
betty_krawczyk@shaw.ca

The Hoffman Wire
Dedicated to Freedom of the Press, Investigative Reporting and Revisionist History

Subscribe: HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com
Michael A. Hoffman II: Editor. www.RevisionistHistory.org

***

August 18, 2008

LATEST NEWS…

1. “Judaism Discovered” being debated online

2. Physician in France makes superb points to Amazon

3. “Judaism Discovered” Now Open for Review at Amazon

4. ” A crack in Amazon’s defenses”

5. Publicity news

———-

1. There is an online discussion/debate of “Judaism Discovered” here: http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread382043/pg1

2. A physician based n France sent the following letter to the CEO of Amazon.com:

Dear Mr Bezos,

I am concerned about your policy of making books available in a selective way (CENSORSHIP) in general, and about Amazon’s treatment of Hoffman’s recent book Judaism Discovered in particular.

This book is only available through Amazon associates and resellers at a far greater price than the price the author asks for. Moreover, the author has plenty of copies on supply for Amazon to sell it, but Amazon still does not sell his book.

I am a medical doctor, a reviewer, and I bought a certain quantity of books from Amazon in recent years. Also I made comments, reviews, and even joined Amazon associates. My previous letter concerning Hoffman’s recent book has not been answered.

Should I not receive a satisfactory and full explanation of Amazon’s censorship of Hoffman’s Judaism Discovered, here is what I’ll do :

01. Stop buying from Amazon;
02. Stop reviewing books for Amazon;
03. Return current orders and leave Amazon Associates for good;
04. Delete my previous reviews and close my Amazon account for good;
05. Make all this public and use my not inconsiderable influence to stop censorship at Amazon for good.

Sincerely,

3. As noted in yesterday’s Hoffman Wire, readers registered as buyers with Amazon.com may now review the book here:
http://www.amazon.com/Judaism-Discovered-Anti-Biblical-Self-Worship-Superstition/dp/0970378459/ref=pd_bbs_sr_1?ie=UTF8&s=books&qid=1216990832&sr=1-1


4. ” A crack in Amazon’s defenses”

In response to yesterday’s Hoffman Wire on Amazon’s “chess” move, we received the following:

Dear Michael Hoffman,

Perseverance wins all.  You have already made a crack in Amazon’s defenses, so now we must continue to contact Amazon, persistently and intelligently–and this we must do for the Love of God–therefore I suggest you continue to ask your readership to contact Amazon and now on to other avenues of distribution.  I will be happy to do my part.

May Our Lord Bless our efforts.  Remember consistent and intelligent dialogue with Amazon will pay off.

Respectfully yours,

G. J. N.

5. Publicity News

Ian Buckley who writes for Israel Shamir, reprinted our Thursday, Aug. 14 Hoffman Wire column about publicity for “Judaism Discovered,” on Mr. Shamir’s e-mail forum, which was a bit awkward since many Shamir readers would have needed more background and introduction to what we are talking about, than that particular column provides. Mr. Buckley’s reprint was e-mailed on a weekend and I’m not sure if many people saw it, but it’s better than nothing and we sincerely thank Ian Buckley.

Hesham Tillawi and Jeff Rense have both invited us on their radio programs. We have had to postpone acceptance of these invitations because I am back to working 18 hours a day — this time in the shipping room helping the one-full-time shipper and the one part-time helper enter in the computer and then box and ship hundreds upon hundreds of orders for a book whose shipping weight is nearly five pounds. Is it ridiculous that I too must help ship a book that I wrote? Perhaps, in that it would probably be best if I dedicated myself solely to publicizing it full-time. But nothing has changed about our financial situation i.e. chronic shortage of funds. Moreover, we cannot just overnight place a Help Wanted ad or hire a helper from the local Jobs Plus personnel pool, due to security concerns. Hiring responsible temporary help is difficult even for a “normal” business. With us it takes planning and budgeting to fill a “security-sensitive” position and since we don’t have a reliable regular monthly income, the people working for us now are barely paid, semi-volunteers who are willing to risk their personal safety. In 2007 we received bursts of generous donations, in addition to a $6000 interest-free loan, both of which partly funded the research, writing and publishing of “Judaism Discovered.”

Most of these funds were received in 2007. In early 2008, while I was deep into the writing of the book, income and donations fell precipitously due to the fact I was unable to constantly promote, promote, promote our project. Moreover, certain people began to lose faith that the book would ever be finished and I refused to be rushed (which alienated them); hence, we built a substantial deficit in 2008 and now sales from the book must be used to: finish paying off the cost of the printing of the book itself, the loan, the many bills that piled up in early 2008 and debts I incurred while I had no income (I too am human, have children, a mortgage, a grocery bill etc).

People generally don’t want to hear about this. They have their troubles too, they will tell you, and that is certainly true in many cases, although 20 miles north of Coeur d’Alene a man who claims to be a Christian and claims to be deeply committed to exposing Judaism arrived in his private jet for a vacation but has no interest in meeting with this this writer. I feel sorry for this fellow because if Dives won’t help Lazarus, payment will come due, eventually. You will notice I have done no fund-raising of late. I don’t want to bore or anger people. I only mention all of the preceding because to some it would seem demented that I do not avail myself immediately of the Rense and Tillawi offers in order to build momentum for the book.

Such thinking applies to a normal business and publisher, not to us. For example, we have to pay for security and take special precautions for safety’s sake. What would really help would be to acquire a dedicated facility where security would be built-in to the house or building (at present we work out of the basement of our over-crowded home and the children are exposed to the risks which inherently accrue from their father’s writing). I am not telling you everything that is transpiring, including attacks on us (because such information can encourage the Enemy). Suffice it to say I did not write “Judaism Discovered” for fun or profit! I wrote it for one reason only. I believed God wanted it written. I am in His hands and that’s what keeps us going. His servants will help to the degree of their ability and for all those who have helped we are truly grateful. Meanwhile, please don’t expect sophisticated “Madison Avenue” type promotional efficiency from us. We’re working as hard as we can; so keep the faith and pray for a miracle!

***

Yesterday’s Hoffman Wire, “An Astute Chess Move by Amazon” is here:
http://revisionistreview.blogspot.com/2008/08/astute-chess-move-by-amazoncom.html

——————-

The HOFFMAN WIRE is a public service of Independent History and Research
Box 849,
Coeur d’Alene, Idaho
83816 USA

24 Hour Revisionist News Bureau:
http://www.revisionisthistory.org/page1/news.html
Subscribe:  HoffmanWire-subscribe@topica.com

Disclaimer: The Hoffman Wire is a controversial and politically incorrect e-mail letter intended only for those who have requested it.  We have a strict anti-spamming policy. The views expressed in the Hoffman Wire are the sole responsibility of the author(s) and do not reflect the views of advertisers or the transmitter.

Freedom of the Press: A hallowed right.
Responsible Dissent: A contribution to understanding and dialogue.
———————————————————-

Kangaroo Canada

by Douglas Farrow

Copyright (c) 2008 First Things (August/September 2008).
http://www.firstthings.com/

Mark Steyn is the author of the bestselling America Alone, a witty tirade against the decline of the West, a portion of which appeared in the Canadian magazine Maclean’s. Ezra Levant was the publisher of a journal called the Western Standard, which in 2006 reprinted cartoons depicting Muhammad from a Danish newspaper. Steyn and Levant have now been hauled before Canada’s human rights commissions to answer to charges of hate speech.

These commissions (HRCs, for short) were set up in the 1960s and 1970s with the aim of combating discrimination on a practical level. In recent times, however, they have transmogrified into mechanisms for enforcing politically correct ideologies and silencing dissent. “It never occurred to us,” remarks Alan Borovoy, one of the originators of the HRCs, “that this instrument, which we intended to deal with discrimination in housing, employment and the provision of goods and services, would be used to muzzle the expression of opinion.”

That is exactly what has happened, through the mechanism of Section 13 of the Human Rights Act, which prohibits hate messages. Under Canada’s criminal code, the incitement of hatred is already counted a crime—but against that charge, truth and good faith are viable defenses, and the burden of proof lies with the accuser. Not so with the Human Rights Act. As James Allan, a law professor in Queensland, marvels: “To be in breach of these hate-speech provisions, you don’t have to counsel violence; you don’t have to urge discrimination; you don’t have to express hatred; you don’t even have to have said or written something that did, in fact, subject some group to hatred or contempt. All that is needed is that your comments, in the view of the sort of people chosen to staff these tribunals, are ‘likely’ to expose someone or some group to contempt or hatred.”

Allan, like many other bemused observers, refers to the HRCs as kangaroo courts. Their proceedings display a bouncy ineptitude and, simultaneously, a sinister level of collusion. Take, for example, Richard Warman, a former investigator for the national commission who decided that it was more fun to be the aggrieved victim of a human rights violation. He has filed twenty-six complaints so far, including more than half of Section 13 complaints to the Canadian Human Rights Commission (CHRC). What’s more, he has a perfect 100 percent conviction rate for these complaints.

These quasi-judicial bodies are staffed by political appointees who have neither the qualifications nor the independence of regular judges. Their ad hoc procedures provide no firm rules for evidence; bigoted comments, posted by strangers to websites in foreign jurisdictions, have been judged admissible, for example. No actual proof of harm is required in order to obtain a conviction. Investigations and deliberations are driven by far-reaching, utopian mandates to “reduce discrimination and promote social change.”

The growing train of hate-speech prosecutions might have been derailed as long ago as 1990, when an appeal brought Section 13 under review by the Supreme Court in Taylor v. Canada. The court found, however, that the Charter’s guarantee of freedom of expression “is not unduly impaired.” Writing for the majority, Chief Justice Dickson opined that, “as long as human rights tribunals continue to be well aware of the purpose” of Section 13, “there is little danger that subjective opinion as to offensiveness will supplant the proper meaning of the section.”

That view now appears rather naive. Allegations have been made that agents or former agents of the CHRC have themselves posted hate messages online under pseudonyms, and even by way of Internet identity theft, and that their activities in manufacturing offenses have been covered up by evidence and transcript tampering. Meanwhile, for evidence that “subjective opinion as to offensiveness” is getting the upper hand, one need look no further than the recent judgment against Stephen Boissoin. A Protestant pastor, Boissoin was brought before the Alberta commission for a letter to his local newspaper in which he issued a “war cry” against “the aggressive propagation of homo and bisexuality” and articulated some decidedly countercultural opinions, asserting that “where homosexuality flourishes, all manner of wickedness abounds.”

Read the rest of this entry »

The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling

Ch. II: THE TALMUD REVILED

Chapter Summary

The Christian of today is bombarded from all sides with reference to our “Judaeo-Christian Heritage,” our “Judaeo-Christian Civilization,” and the “brotherhood” which should prevail, presumably, between Christian and Talmudic Judaism. Such propaganda could only succeed if one is in ignorance as to the nature of the Talmud and the total antagonism between present-day Judaism and Christianity which necessarily must exist.

Over the centuries and right up to the present century, there was not such ignorance of Talmudic precepts. The truth as it was repeatedly revealed, caused it and its adherents to be reviled, and justly so.

It is indeed strange that the Bulls of the Popes over the many centuries, warning against the Jews, should be seemingly unknown to the Catholic clergy today, and that the writings of Luther, which generally are like almost a second gospel to Protestants of the Lutheran fold, should be equally unknown on this subject today!

The first English translation of the Babylonian Talmud was in 1903 by Rodkinson (real name — M. Levi Frumkin), and was edited by Rabbi Isaac M. Wise, “Father” of so-called “Reform Judaism.” Rodkinson deleted much of the filth which is in the unexpurgated Talmud, and used no identifying folio numbers, as were in the original, but nevertheless, even this abridged translation proved very revealing. The Introduction states: (See Exhibit 9):

The persecutors of the Talmud, during the period ranging from the First Century B.C., have varied in their character, objects and actions. In one respect, however, they all agreed, namely, in their general wish to destroy its existence. Careful consideration of its many vicissitudes certainly justifies the assertion that the Talmud is one of the wonders of the world. During the twenty centuries of its existence not one of them has passed without great and powerful enemies vying with each other and exhausting every effort to destroy it; still it survived in its entirety, and not only has the power of its foes failed to destroy even a single line, but it has not even been able materially to weaken its influence for any length of time. It still dominates the minds of a whole people, who venerate its contents as divine truth, and countless numbers have sacrificed their lives and their possessions to save it from perishing.

Read the rest of this entry »

The Jewish Religion: Its Influence Today
by Elizabeth Dilling

Chapter I: THE PHARISEES, THE TALMUD, AND MODERN JUDAISM

Chapter Summary

Bible scholars are aware that Jesus Christ denounced the Pharisees. He said they nullified all the Commandments of God by their Tradition, “teaching for doctrines the commandments of men” (Mark 7:13; Matt. 15:6-9, etc.). His invective, in truth, cannot be equaled. All of Matthew 23 is like a whiplash. He likened Pharisaism to a whited sepulchre, indeed beautiful outwardly, but “inside full of dead men’s bones and of all uncleanness.” Christ climaxed one condemnation after another with the expletive, “Hypocrites!” He called the Pharisees children of them that killed the Prophets. He foretold they would go on killing, crucifying and persecuting until the guilt for all the righteous blood shed from Abel on down would be upon them. “Ye serpents, ye generation of vipers, how can ye escape the damnation of hell?” Christ asked.

Christ is as utterly devastating of Pharisaism in the record of John 8. Although He admitted that His hearers were descendants of Abraham, He said they were, spiritually, of the devil. Christ told them:

Ye are of your father the devil, and the lusts of your father ye will do. He was a murderer from the beginning, and abode not in the truth, because the truth is not in him. When he speaketh a lie, he speaketh of his own: for he is a liar and the father of it (John 8:44).

The Missing Link

“But,” says the disinterested Christian, “what has that to do with us today? What a group of Pharisees did two thousand years ago is over and done with!”

However, the missing link in Christian understanding on the subject of “Pharisees” is best supplied by the Universal Jewish Encyclopedia (1943):

The Jewish religion as it is today traces its descent, without a break, through all the centuries, from the Pharisees. Their leading ideas and methods found expression in a literature of enormous extent, of which a very great deal is still in existence. The Talmud is the largest and most important single piece of that literature … and the study of it is essential for any real understanding of Pharisaism.

Concerning the Pharisees, the 1905 Jewish Encyclopedia says:

With the destruction of the Temple (70 A.D.) the Sadducees disappeared altogether, leaving the regulation of all Jewish affairs in the hands of the Pharisees. Henceforth, Jewish life was regulated by the Pharisees; the whole history of Judaism was reconstructed from the Pharisaic point of view, and a new aspect was given to the Sanhedrin of the past. A new chain of tradition supplanted the older priestly tradition (Abot 1:1). Pharisaism shaped the character of Judaism and the life and thought of the Jew for all the future. (See Exhibit 264 herein.)

Historically speaking, scripture believers had accepted Christ as the Messiah foretold. They were no longer “Jews,” but called themselves “Christians.” They were persecuted as such by the Pharisees. The word “Pharisee” comes from the word “separated.” (See Exhibit 300.)

Read the rest of this entry »

My Country, Canada, Guilty of Human Rights Violations

By Deborah Elaine Barrie
deborah@noccawood.ca
Wed, July 30, 2008

I live in a country where your neighbors are allowed to poison you. They are allowed to steal your health and that of your family. They are allowed to contaminate your property and there is nothing you can do about it.

I remember when we bought our home how happy we were to finally offer our children some stability. To show them that we lived in a country where if you worked hard you could make your dreams come true. I had no idea how wrong I was about that. Shortly after moving into this home we became ill like so many of our neighbors around us. It took many years to discover the cause; the burning of cca treated wood and other scrap by a neighbor in a woodstove in his garage. It took many more years to learn how serious a problem this was and then more to get it stopped. Why, because I wasn’t concerned? No, because industry and government fought me every step of the way. They even tried to humiliate me into giving up.

My local hospital often refused me treatment and left me in pain or choking when I had breathed in arsine gas. Someone becoming ill from something in the environment was not considered socially acceptable. The hospital emergency even refused to carry out written instructions from two neurologists even after thousands of dollars and many tests were performed to find out how to treat me best. They once even went as far as to call a neighboring hospital and tell them not to treat me if I arrived there.

The Ontario government even wrote to my supporters that the cca burning situation in my neighborhood had been investigated. I ask them to show me the proof of that investigation. Oh sure I remembered my contact with the M.O.E., the insults, the abuse of power. It hardly seemed like an investigation to me. Not even when they finally showed up at a doctor’s request and managed to take the soil samples at a depth which would miss the fly ash and give them the results they wanted, not the true results.

I kept working on getting cca treated wood banned because my investigation showed we were all in danger; not just the people breathing in the hexavalent chromium and the arsine gas from the places this wood was being burned. How did I discover this? A Health Canada scientist gave me a copy of his alarming study. Then I filed an access for information request and when most of the information I had filed for was denied me I didn’t stop. I phoned up the commissioner and taught her about the dangers I had already discovered and asked her to get me that data I was being denied that could protect Canadians and that is what she did. Our government hid what they knew about cca wood dangers from us.

Read the rest of this entry »

Washington Report on Middle East Affairs, May-June 2007, pages 28-29

Special Report

Israel’s Hush-Up Machine in Action: Denying Story Israel Executed Egyptian Prisoners
By Richard H. Curtiss and Donna B. Curtiss

Israel’s hush-up machine was in overdrive in March while this writer was in the Middle East. A story resurfaced that Egyptian prisoners had been executed in both the 1956 and 1967 Israeli-Egyptian wars, which is certainly true. Israel then changed its story to say that the prisoners were Palestinian fighters and not Egyptians. With each successive day the stories became so confusing that, except in Egypt itself, the allegation received less and less coverage. So it’s time for a refresher review of Israeli atrocities.

In the words of the late Israeli Gen. Moshe Dayan: “The declaration of the State of Israel in 1948 was at the expense of ethnically cleansing 513 Palestinian villages, creating over 700,000 Palestinian refugees and expropriating their lands, homes and businesses in 78 percent of Palestine…There is not one single place built in this country that did not have a former population.”

Here are some events of the mid-20th century that should be emblazoned in the minds of Americans. An early atrocity is described on the Web site of Deir Yassin Remembered, www.deiryassin.org: “Early in the morning of April 9, 1948, commandos of the Irgun, headed by Menachem Begin, and the Stern Gang [both Jewish extremist terrorist groups] attacked Deir Yassin, a village with about 750 Palestinian residents. It was several weeks before the end of the British Mandate. The village lay outside the area that the United Nations recommended be included in a future Jewish state. Deir Yassin had a peaceful reputation and was even said by a Jewish newspaper to have driven out some Arab militants. But it was located on high ground in the corridor between Tel Aviv and Jerusalem…

“By noon over 100 people, half of them women and children, had been systematically murdered. Four commandos died at the hands of resisting Palestinians using old Mausers and muskets. Twenty-five male villagers were loaded into trucks, paraded through the Zakhron Yosef quarter in Jerusalem, and then taken to a stone quarry along the road between Givat Shaul and Deir Yassin and shot to death. The remaining residents were driven to Arab East Jerusalem.”

That evening Irgunists and Sternists described the operation to foreign correspondents. “They said that 25 members of the Haganah militia had reinforced the attack and claimed that an Arabic-speaking Jew had warned the villagers over a loudspeaker from an armored car.” This was duly reported in The New York Times on April 10. A final body count of 254 was reported by The New York Times on April 13, a day after they were finally buried…
“There was an atmosphere that it was okay to do it.”

Leaders of Haganah, precursors of the Israel Defense Forces, tried to distance themselves from the attack, just as they had after the Irgun’s 1946 attack on the King David Hotel. Haganah leaders admitted that the massacre “disgraced the cause of Jewish fighters and dishonored Jewish arms and the Jewish flag.” They played down the fact that their own militia “had reinforced the terrorists’ attack, even though they did not participate in the barbarism and looting during the subsequent ‘mopping up’ operations.”

According to the Irgun’s leader Menachem Begin, who later became prime minister of Israel, “Arabs throughout the country, induced to believe wild tales of ‘Irgun butchery,’ were seized with limitless panic and started to flee for their lives. This mass flight soon developed into a maddened, uncontrollable stampede. The political and economic significance of this development can hardly be overestimated…”

According to the Deir Yassin Remembered Web site, “The massacre of Palestinians at Deir Yassin is one of the most significant events in 20th century Palestinian and Israeli history. This is not because of its size or its brutality, but because it stands as the starkest early warning of a calculated depopulation of over 700,000 Palestinian inhabitants to make room for survivors of the Holocaust and other Jews from the rest of the world.”

Another major act of terrorism after Deir Yassin was the Qibya massacre, which is described in the Friends of al-Aqsa Web site www.aqsa.org.uk : “The Qibya massacre occurred in 1953, when the special unit 101, founded and led by Ariel Sharon, who later became Israeli prime minister, attacked the village of Qibya, in Palestine. Sharon’s unit attacked in the middle of the night and killed more than 60 people, including women and children, and demolished over 50 homes. U.N observers stated that the villagers had been forced to stay indoors while their houses were blown up around them.”
Unnecessary Killings

In the Sinai campaign of 1956, England and France conspired with Israel to attack Egypt after Egyptian President Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal. It took Israel only a day and a half to conquer the Sinai peninsula. More than 2,000 Egyptians were killed and 4,000 captured. Israeli General Ayre Biro admitted in 1965 that unnecessary killings had taken place.

According to researchers and retired IDF soldiers, IDF soldiers executed hundreds of unarmed Egyptian soldiers in Sinai during both the 1956 Sinai campaign and, later, during the 1967 Six-Day War, the June 27, 2000 Israeli newspaper Haaretz reported.

Of the 1967 war’s executions, Israeli historian Uri Milstein wrote: “It was not an official policy, but there was an atmosphere that it was okay to do it. Some commanders decided to do it; others refused. But everyone knew of it.”

In 1997, the BBC reported on a Sept. 7 news conference held by the Egyptian Human Rights Organization. EHRO Secretary-General Muhammad Munib described a report which “had taken 18 months to prepare and complete, during which certified testimonies were obtained from several Egyptian officers and soldiers who were eyewitnesses to the killing of Egyptian POWs at the hands of Israeli forces during the wars of 1956 and 1967.“

According to the BBC, Munib’s report confirmed that Israel had killed between 7,000 to 15,000 Egyptian prisoners of war during the wars of 1956 and 1967. Munib said that “the locations of 11 mass graves had been determined in Sinai and Israel, in which thousands of Egyptian prisoners were buried. He noted that the prisoners were military men and civilians, of whom several were killed by Israeli tanks that were used to go over them while they were tied up. [my emphasis. A.T.] He added that this was the first report on those crimes, which transcended what had taken place during other wars such as World War II and the war in Bosnia.”

An Oct. 8, 1995 Toronto Star article by Martin Cohn focused on revelations from an unrepentant retired Israeli general, Arieh Biro, who admitted executing 49 captured Egyptian soldiers in 1956. “It is an irony that has not escaped Egyptian commentators,” Cohn wrote. “Israelis and Jews abroad have relentlessly pursued Nazi war criminals for decades for war crimes committed during World War II. ‘They chase Nazi war criminals for the rest of their lives, 60 to 70 years—down the road,’ Egyptian political scientist Walid Kazziha observed in an interview. ‘But for Israeli crimes of mass murder, they’re letting them go—even when they admit it.’”

More than a decade ago USS Liberty survivor James Ennes, speculated in these pages that Israeli forces shot and killed 150 or more Egyptian Prisoners of War at the town of El-Arish while the USS Liberty  passed just 12 miles offshore (see p. 28 of the May/June 1996 Washington Report and p. 27 of this issue).

The story of the massacre originally came from Israeli eyewitnesses, and was reported in Israel’s Yediot Ahronot and again, recently, by Israeli journalist Ran Adelist on Israeli television. Then and now, however, it has largely been ignored by the American press and government, despite the fact that this massacre was a serious war crime and could well have been the reason for the attack on the Liberty.

One may wonder how the Egyptians treated Israeli POWs. Maj. Gen. Hassan Al-Gandali, a former chief of operations of the Egyptian army, said there were a number of Israeli POWs in Egyptian camps in 1973. “We were very much concerned about their welfare, though we were aware of the way the Israelis had dealt with our POWs under their custody,” Hassan said.

“As I was the chief of operations, I accompanied Egyptian Defense Minister Musheer Ahmad Ismail to the camp in which Col. Esaf Yagouri and 150 prisoners were kept. On seeing us the prisoners looked so terrified as they seemed to think that we were going to send them to the firing squad in return for what Israel had done to the Egyptian POWs in the past. On the other hand, Musheer told them that he did not blame them for obeying the orders of their superiors though it was to occupy a territory belonging to another country. ‘However, you will be treated in line with the Geneva Conventions. So you have nothing to worry about,’ Musheer said.

“Then he asked the commander of the camp about the sick POWs and took special care of them. He also ordered the camp commander to take the POWs for sightseeing in Cairo, including a trip to the pyramids and a boat ride on the Nile. After a few moments of disbelief the prisoners broke into a deafening applause. This is how the Egyptians treat their prisoners of war.”

For Israelis, who stress their “purity of arms” code—which has been the core of Israel’s self-image through five wars—the information about Israel’s murder of prisoners of war may jar their sense of Jewish morality. Israel’s actions throughout its history, including the violent acts which preceded its establishment, should puncture Israel’s historical myths once and for all.

Richard H. Curtiss is executive editor of the Washington Report on Middle East Affairs.
———————
SIDEBAR
A Four-Decade History of Violence

In the 1967 Six-Day War, Israel invaded and occupied the Gaza Strip, Arab East Jerusalem and the West Bank, as well as Egypt’s Sinai Peninsula  and Syria’s Golan Heights, home to an Arab population of about 1.5 million. Between 13,000 and 18,000 Arabs were killed, and 6,000 were taken prisoner.”

Many Americans accept as truth the myth that Israel was defending itself against the Arabs. According to an account by then-Prime Minister Menachem Begin, however, reported in The New York Times of Aug. 21, 1982: “In June 1967, we had a choice. The Egyptian army concentrations in the Sinai approaches do not prove that Nasser was really about to attack us. We must be honest with ourselves. We decided to attack him.”

Then, on Oct. 6, 1973, Egypt and Syria launched a surprise attack on Israel in an attempt to recover the land captured in 1967. That war, known as the Yom Kipper War by the Israelis and the October war by the Arabs, cost more than 15,000 Arab and 2,000 Israeli lives. The United States came to the rescue of Israel with aircraft and arms and, as a result, the territorial gains were minor on either side.

In 1982, Israel invaded Lebanon on the pretext of wiping out the Palestine Liberation Organization in Lebanese camps. Israel occupied Lebanese territory and, according to some accounts, killed between 30,000 and 50,000 Palestinians. The Israelis enabled Lebanese Christian militias to carry out the killing of 2,750 Palestinian refugees in Beirut’s Sabra and Shatila camps.

Between 1987 and 1991 the first Palestinian intifada, or “shaking off” of Israel’s occupation, was waged. The Israeli government’s response to the largely nonviolent intifada was disproportionately harsh and criticized around the world. Some estimate that 1,500 Palestinians were killed and more than 15,000 injured.

During the Oslo peace process which began in 1993, Israel killed over 687 Palestinians, erected roadblocks throughout the West Bank and Gaza which restricted movement by Palestinians, and built 30 new settlements on Palestinian-owned land, confiscating more than 250,000 acres. The number of settlers increased from 80,000 in 1991 to 210,000 in 2001.

According to the BBC’s Martin Asser, “In 1996, one of the deadliest single events of the whole Arab-Israeli conflict took place in Qana, Lebanon—the shelling of a U.N. base where hundreds of local people were sheltering. More than 100 were killed and another 100 injured, cut down by Israeli anti-personnel shells that exploded in the air, sending a lethal shower of shrapnel to the ground. A U.N. investigation reported in May 1996 that the deaths at the Qana base were unlikely to have been the result of an accident, as claimed by the Israelis.”

The al-Aqsa intifada, which began in 2000, continues until the present. It was sparked when Israeli opposition leader Ariel Sharon and his Likud followers deliberately provoked the Palestinians by storming into the al-Aqsa compound in Jerusalem—an act the U.N. called a clear breach of the human rights of the Palestinians.

Ten years later, during Israel’s 2006 bombardment of Lebanon, Qana again was in the headlines, this time because of a single massive bomb dropped by an Israeli aircraft, causing a building to collapse on top of dozens of civilians, many of whom had been seeking shelter in the basement. Human Rights Watch investigated the incident and issued a report on Aug. 3 saying that 28 people were known to have died, while 13 were missing.—R.H.C.

COMMUNIST PARTY BACKS OBAMA

By Cliff Kincaid

July 4, 2008
Http://www.NewsWithViews.com

Barack Obama’s patriotic tour has run into a snag. More evidence of communist backing for the candidate has surfaced. The latest to emerge publicly in Obama’s camp is Joelle Fishman, the chairman of the Communist Party USA (CPUSA) Political Action Commission. In a column titled, “Big political shifts are underway,” Fishman says that Obama could lead “a landslide defeat of the Republican ultra-right” this November and that he is “ready to listen” to the “left and progressive voters” backing him. Fishman makes it clear that the CPUSA is part of this coalition.

Meanwhile, admitted CPUSA member Alan Maki, writing on the official Barack Obama website, in the “community blogs” section under an “Obama 08″ banner, has mentioned the unmentionable. That is the role of CPUSA member Frank Marshall Davis in mentoring Obama during his formative high school years in Hawaii.

Although fine print at the bottom of the page says that “Content on blogs in My.BarackObama represents the opinions of community members and in no way should be interpreted as endorsed or approved by the campaign,” the information provided by Maki is deadly confirmation that a hard-core CPUSA member played a key role in helping raise Obama. It is a story that most media, including some “conservative” news outlets, have shied away from.

Davis, who died in 1987, was a Stalinist who stayed with the CPUSA when others were abandoning it, and he refused, as late as 1956, to deny his membership in the party. He was selected by Obama’s white grandfather to be the future candidate’s role model and father-figure.

Obama showed his gratitude by going to socialist conferences and selecting Marxist professors as his friends in college. Later, of course, he would arrive in Chicago and launch his political career in the arms of communist terrorists Bill Ayers and Bernardine Dohrn, who, according to declassified intelligence information (PDF), were members of a group with connections to the CPUSA, foreign communist regimes, and even the Soviet KGB. The information shows that their close terrorist associate, Kathy Boudin, attended Moscow University and was subsidized by the Soviet government. Her father was a CPUSA member and a registered Cuban agent, documents show.

Praise for the CPUSA Figure

Announcing the “Frank Marshall Davis roundtable for change” on the Obama website, Maki, a Democratic Party activist and casino worker organizer, explained, “Reading Barack Obama’s book I learned about his mentor, Frank Marshall Davis.” He went on, “Of course, as we all know, Frank Marshall Davis was a Communist and he had a very good understanding of the underlying source of problems which all too often goes unstated and unchallenged and remains hidden because of the high fear-factor level in this country; I am referring to capitalism, a thoroughly rotten system. Frank Marshall Davis also understood through his thorough studies of the situation that socialism provided the only workable alternative to capitalism.”

Saying that he has been “active in the Minnesota DFL and the Democratic Party most of my life,” Maki still wants to know about the specifics of the “change” Obama is promising.

Maki goes on to say, “There really isn’t much for us to learn about ‘change’ from Obama, but there is quite a bit to be gleaned from the writings of Frank Marshall Davis and I thank Barack Obama for bringing him to my attention… now I can say that Frank Marshall Davis is in many ways my mentor, too.”

In a telephone conversation, Maki admitted being a CPUSA member and claimed the FBI had thousands of pages on him. A friendly fellow, he maintains more than a dozen blogs. One of them is simply titled, “Communist manifesto.”

For her part, CPUSA official Fishman seems to have more insight into Obama’s notion of change. “In sharp contrast” to John McCain, Fishman writes, “Obama speaks of strengthening government to provide health care and jobs, address global warming and end the war in Iraq.”

Drudge Plays Role of Censor

While Obama’s far-left support seems to be worthy of news and comment, Matt Drudge of Drudge Report fame has just rejected two paid ads submitted by my group America’s Survival, Inc. about the influence that CPUSA member Davis exerted over a young Obama. The ads featured a photo of Davis and a communist hammer and sickle. They asked, “Who is this man?,” and urged viewers to click to “Meet the mysterious Red Mentor” so they could be directed to two reports on the subject. The ads were “too controversial,” Drudge’s representative told me.

http://palestinethinktank.com/2008/07/15/detente-or-hidden-agendas-a-sign-of-the-times-by-gilad-atzmon/

Détente or Hidden Agendas? A sign of “The Times”

By Gilad Atzmon
July 15th, 2008

Back in 2003 I wrote, “If ‘world peace’ is our main concern, we must achieve a balance of power, we must let the oppressed people of this world have access to the most advanced weaponry…. Balance of power is the only key to peace.” Nowadays, when Israel and its supportive lobbies are doing everything within their powers to drag us all into a third world war, I find it necessary to say it again. The only way to spare the Middle East and the entire world from another devastating cycle of bloodshed is to let the Iranians have their nuclear toy. But it goes even further, seemingly, the only way to save the Jewish state from its merciless parade of belligerent omnipotence is to let Iran join the nuclear club ASAP. The only thing that may cool down the Zionist militant genocidal enthusiasm is an overwhelming Iranian might of deterrence.

But it isn’t only Iran. The only possible way to bring peace to the region is to equip Syria, the Hezbollah and the Hamas with the exact weaponry that would help make the Israelis think twice. As much as the Israelis love to punish their enemies they really hate to pay the ultimate price. Once the Israelis become aware of the clear possibility of their own destruction, they may rapidly develop some real inclination towards peace and reconciliation.

Yet, we have to remember that Israel is not alone in this lethal game. According to the Sunday Times, “President George W Bush has told the Israeli government that he may be prepared to approve a future military strike on an Iranian nuclear plant…Despite the opposition of his own generals and widespread skepticism that America is ready to risk the military, political and economic consequences of an airborne strike on Iran, the president has given an ‘amber light’ to an Israeli plan to attack Iran’s main nuclear sites with long-range bombing sorties”.

Seemingly, we are not in any shortage of lunatics. For more than a while, we are fully aware that the road from Jerusalem to Washington is a soaking red route. However, there is something rather faulty or even amusing in the western argument for a war. According to our western analysts, President Ahmadinejad is really unpopular amongst his people and he is on his way out. The Sunday Times’ editorial informed us yesterday that: “Last year a Tehran website poll of 20,000 people found that 62.5% of those who voted for him (Ahmadinejad) in 2005 would not do so in next year’s presidential election.” I am slightly puzzled. If this is indeed the case, if the Iranian president is politically ruined, why are we so keen to initiate another world war? Wouldn’t it be better to wait for a few months and let this Ahmadinejad be ousted by his own people? Apparently, The Sunday Times and our very many Neocons do not believe their own lies.

In its editorial The Sunday Times tries to give the impression that Ahmadinejad is taking his people into war just to divert the attention from his policy that is failing at home. “With inflation running at an estimated 14% and one-third of the population unemployed, Ahmadinejad’s goal of ‘putting the petroleum income on people’s tables’ is as distant as ever.“

I would be rather suspicious about the Sunday Times’ reading of Iranian current internal affairs as much as I was suspicious of the paper’s reading of Iraqi WMD situation. However, I better admit it, I do not live in Iran. In fact, I live in the West, in London if to be specific. And it is actually in London where I see a growing dismay having to do with very cloudy financial predictions. It is in London where I read about the collapse of major western financial institutions. It is in London where I detect a growing recession and a threat of financial depression.

I ask myself whether The Times’ faulty reading of Ahmadinejad is nothing but a banal projection? I assume that this is indeed the case. In fact it is the other way around. It is our western leaders who are failing to provide for their constituencies and citizens. It is our Western leaders who are taking us to wars just to cover their disastrous malfunctioning. It is our western leaders who are about to initiate a world war just to whitewash the collapse of the western capitalistic dream.

One has to be blind not to see it all.

http://www.gilad.co.uk
http://www.myspace.com/giladaztmon

[Editor’s Note: While this is scary, threatening shit it must never be forgotten that those organizing this plan are the Zionist forces who are hell-bent on instituting their global slave state. In order to keep the people dumbed down they need to be able to continue with their incessant brainwashing and that means controlling the means of communication.

The article states, erroneously, I believe, that the ISPs are just in it for the money. It’s not about money. These psychopaths already HAVE all the money. It’s about POWER AND CONTROL OF PEOPLE AND INSTITUTIONS AND GOVERNMENTS VIA OWNERSHIP AND MANIPULATION OF THE MEANS OF COMMUNICATION. This is the fundamental tenet of the program for instituting the supposed “New World Order” dictatorship of the masses and without absolute control of content on the net then the Achilles Heel factor is always present.
The ISPs and the giants of Media are Zionist entities and they are our imminent and ever-present enemies when it comes to freedom of speech. Never forget that!]

———

Canadian ISPs Plan Net Censorship

Concerns grow that Canada’s plan will wipeout alt news sites and spread to U.S.

By Mike Finch

A net-neutrality activist group has uncovered plans for the demise of the free Internet by 2010 in Canada. By 2012, the group says, the trend will be global.

Bell Canada and TELUS, Canada’s two largest Internet service providers (ISPs), will begin charging per-site fees on most Internet sites, reports anonymous sources within TELUS.

“It’s beyond censorship, it is killing the biggest ecosystem of free expression and freedom of speech that has ever existed,” I Power spokesperson Reese Leysen said. I Power was the first group to report on the possible changes.

Bell Canada has not returned calls or emails.

The plans made by the large telecom businesses would change the Internet into a cable-like system, where customers sign up for specific web sites, and must pay to see each individual site beyond a certain point. Subscription browsing would be limited, extra fees would be applied to access out-of-network sites. Many sites would be blocked altogether.

“We had inside sources from bigger companies who gave us the information on how exclusivity deals are being made at this moment between ISPs and big content providers (like TV production studios and major video game publishers) to decide which web sites will be in the ‘standard package’ offered to their customers, leaving all the rest of the Internet unreachable unless you pay extra subscription fees per every ‘non-standard’ site you visit,” Leysen said. “We knew the source to be 100% reliable, but we also knew the story would be highly controversial if we released the information. We did it because we knew that we’d get more official confirmations once we’d come forward with it. And indeed that is what happened. Dylan Pattyn, who is writing the soon-to-be published article for Time Magazine, received confirmation from sources within Bell Canada and TELUS after we released the information.”

The plans would in effect be economic censorship, with only the top 100 to 200 sites making the cut in the initial subscription package. Such plans would likely favor major news outlets and suppress smaller news outlets, as the major news outlets would be free (with subscription), and alternative news outlets, like AFP, would incur a fee for every visit.

“The Internet will become a playground for billion-dollar content providers just like television is,” said Leysen. “It won’t be possible for a few teenagers in their parents’ basement to start a small site like E-bay that then grows out to be the next big thing anymore. Right now the Internet belongs to those with the greatest ideas. In the future, it’ll belong to those with the biggest budgets.”

With plans in Canada uncovered, I Power thinks that companies in the United States and other nations are also planning similar actions.

“By 2012 ISPs all over the globe will reduce Internet access to a TV-like subscription model, only offering access to a small standard amount of commercial sites and require extra fees for every other site you visit. These ‘other’ sites would then lose all their exposure and eventually shut down, resulting in what could be seen as the end of the Internet,” Leysen said.

Such a subscription plan could possibly restrict free speech far beyond even the current restrictions set by the governments of communist China. Not only would browsing be limited, but privacy would be invaded, as every web site viewed would likely be recorded on a bill in a manner similar to a phone bill.

Why would the ISPs institute such a plan? One word: money.

“This new subscription model is commercially far more beneficial to them than how it is now,” Leysen said. “If Fox wants to launch a new television show online, they’ll have to pay big money to all major ISPs to ensure that their new show will be offered and pushed in the ‘standard package’ of sites/services/channels that people will get through their Internet access. Plus ISPs will also gain extra revenue out of people trying to access the rest of the Internet, as they’ll pay extra subscription fees for every web site they visit.”

But it’s not just the big ISPs that stand to gain.

“Marketing and big budget ‘content-pushing’ just doesn’t seem to work on the Internet, and this is something that several industries want fixed. ISPs know this and will benefit greatly by fixing this for the marketing and entertainment industry,” Leysen said.

The ISPs are said to be confident they can institute such plans through deceptive marketing and fear tactics.

“The Internet will be more and more marketed as a place full of child pornography and other horrible illegal activity in order to get people on their [the ISP’s] side once they start restricting it and make it ‘safer,’” Leysen said. “Unless we really make a stand for this and make sure that mainstream media thoroughly covers the issue, the whole thing will be eased in with proper marketing to make sure that most mainstream customers won’t make a big deal out of it. They will only realize what was lost long after it’s gone..”
——–

For more information about this story see http://ipower.ning.com

For more information about Internet freedom: http://www.savetheinternet.com

Not Copyrighted. Readers can reprint and are free to redistribute - as long as full credit is given to American Free Press - 645 Pennsylvania Avenue SE, Suite 100 Washington, D.C. 20003

PROTOCOLS, SHMOTOKOLS

By Nonny Moose
nonny33@gmail.com

July 8th, 2008
Well, folks, it’s me again. Nonny Moose. I haven’t done much writing lately, because for some time I was waiting for the Radical to start their hard copy paper again, so I could publish in it. You know Arthur had that cute heading over my articles — Recollections of an Old Dog — and there was this sketch of an old dog with a flower in his mouth. I liked that; always believed in taking time to smell the flowers!

Well, I guess the age of electronic publishing is here to stay, so no pictures, just my (ehm) brilliant thoughts to hopefully entertain you.

Well, talking about electronic, I opened the Radical web site, and what do I see there? Well, the texts of the famed Protocols of Zion. I had heard about these periodically for the last 50 years or so, but never saw them before. Now my understanding is that these texts were written some 200 years ago, and that it was claimed that the authors were some wise old Zionist elders, precursors of any modern ones who may not be as wise as they think.

Over time, this authorship was apparently scientifically disproved. And given the number of secret societies in Europe at that ‘time of enlightenment’, it is quite possible that any number of secret sources cobbled this together.

What I did find fascinating as I read them, was how modern some of the proposals sound, and that they accurately describe what has been going on in our lifetime, right to the present. Some of their future “proposals” might even be beneficial, like destroying “capital”. Could that mean corporations? Or could it even mean private banking cartels’ money creating powers? It sounds pretty suspicious.

Sometimes it feels as if someone (the permanent governments?) had found these texts in an attic, and was secretly following them. In order to be able to get away with that, the texts have to be kept out of sight of the general public. One way to do that in our world is to make claims that they are “anti-Semitic”! Very clever, folks, but not necessarily accurate.

I will quote freely for the benefit of lazy readers, but first here is a brief summary of the main thrust to gain total control. The way to power is three fold: One, to control the leaders of a country and, second, that country’s media. The third is to sow economic chaos through excessive indebtedness of citizens and nations. However, and this is an interesting however, it sounds as if the private financial powerhouses would in the end also be dumped and replaced by a rather progressive, centralized State fiscal system. Maybe that is why this document has been guarded so jealously all these years! I include quotes of some critical passages, see for yourselves!

We have suspected for some time that our elected governments are not the real rulers, only tools in the hands of a permanent government aka a plutocracy. Well, how do you control the government that gets put in? Easy, according to these guidelines: you find candidates who have some dark secret to hide and you got it made. An ambitious person with a character flaw, or some criminal act in his/her secret past known only to you, will allow this person to be directed for the ringmasters’ benefit.

I seem to recall that during the presidency of Bill Clinton every time Bill wanted to do something useful for humanity, up popped another bimbo: Medicare? Oh, goodness, semen on a dress. You get the picture. I may not have the sequence right, but there were numerous examples in the Clinton era. Makes you wonder what they have against the current candidates.

And how do you make sure the right person wins, and that the right opinions win? Point number two: Control of the media. But not in a stupid way. The “directors” will actually permit some independent journals: “if we permit ten journals, we will own 30″. Some of these 30 will express opposing views to illuminati’s own interests. That way they will be able to learn who opposes them, and “render them harmless”. How brilliantly subversive! And folks a warning to us all.

Please note also that:

“All our newspapers will be of all possible complexions — aristocratic, republican, revolutionary, even anarchical - for so long, of course, as the constitution exists …In the vain belief that they are following the organ of their party they will, in fact, follow the flag which we hang out for them.”

Thus in allowing attacks upon themselves, the secret power’s aims are being advanced:

“These attacks upon us will also serve another purpose, namely, that our subjects will be convinced to the existence of full freedom of speech and so give our agents an occasion to affirm that all organs which oppose us are empty babblers…”

Well, folks, when I read the above sections, I must tell you I was rather speechless. How can one know this and trust any of our political parties, and any of the NGO’s again? What about the organization of new groups? Will they continually be infiltrated? Who can be trusted? Probably no one.

Certainly, the controlled media is not to be trusted:

“Thanks to such methods we shall be in a position as from time to time may be required, to excite or to tranquillize the public mind on political questions, to persuade or to confuse, printing now truth, now lies, facts or their contradictions, according as they may be well or ill received, always very cautiously feeling our ground before stepping upon it …. “

So the media play a critical role in the social subversion. Note the mixing of truth and lies. Very destabilizing, if only a very few know the plan.

Read the rest of this entry »

Free Speech for Jews: A Critique of Ezra Levant’s “Jews for free speech” article

By Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
July 4, 2008
On May 4, 2008 the Jewish Canadian blogger and former publisher of the Western Standard magazine Ezra Levant ran an article on his website called, “Jews for free speech.” http://ezralevant.com/2008/05/hows-your-psychological-securi.html In it he appears to formally distance himself and many other “individual” Jews from the machinations of the unholy trinity of Zionist Israeli mole operatives working behind the scenes of Canadian politics and known respectively as the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress and the Simon Wiesenthal Centre.

Drawing upon the names of many well-known Jewish writers and media personalities like David Frum and Noam Chomsky, Levant gives his readers the impression that a distinct philosophical, if not spiritual, dichotomy exists between these independent-minded individuals and the likes of the BB, CJC and the SWC who he disdainfully refers to as “the Official Jews, the Professional Jews, the Jews Who Are Jews for a Living”.

On the surface Levant’s criticisms give the impression that, yes, these individual Jewish “mavericks” are definitely not cut from the same cloth as the rest of the “self-chosen” sufferers who continually flog themselves in their traditionally masochistic manner before the Canadian public, moaning and crying afoul about the eternal threat to their “physical and psychological security” as Levant states. But this is not the full story of what is currently happening within either the “Official Jew” camp or the camp of Jewish “free speechers” that Levant would have the general public believe is far removed from the proponents of media censorship and the infamous Sec. 13(1) of the Canadian Human Rights Act.

After doing his utmost to distance himself from these “professional” Jews Levant eventually comes to the crux of his argument contained in the “ADDENDUM” section of his anti-”Official Jew” screed wherein he attempts to prove to his readers that it is not just that the “free speech” Jews find Sec. 13(1) unsavory but that the “anti-Semites” are now using this draconian, post 9-11 insertion into Canadian jurisprudence as a “weapon against us.”

Of course the “anti-Semites” alluded to are not the likes of myself and Radicalpress.com or http://www.PEJ.org , two independent, Canadian alternative media “goy” sites, who Harry Abrams and the League for Human Rights of B’nai Brith Canada have complained to the CHRC are “spreading hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel”. No, that wouldn’t be kosher on the part of Levant or Steyn or his other adherents to give any additional media attention to them because, especially in the case of Radicalpress.com, the evidence of the root involvement of the Zionist forces at work within the fabric of Canadian society and government is too well documented. For Levant and his supporters it is imperative that the public not get the impression that there may be something much more sinister contained within the “Zionist” factor in terms of the overall censorship equation that Canadians are now dealing with in this latest Zionist public relations campaign designed to heap abuse, racism, disinformation and responsibility upon the Muslim community for the woes of all those who are now victims of said Sec. 13(1) legislation.

It’s my assertion that this is all smoke and mirrors designed to smother and obfuscate, in a further PR initiative, the ugly face of Zionist ideology and keep it hidden away from the Canadian publics’ aroused curiosity in this sudden chain of events where we are seeing Jews being highlighted in a scam of massive proportions. The tables have been turned and the shells suddenly flipped over and lo and behold how the exposed culprits in question are squirming and skittering about, frantically trying to conceal their true identities!

Throughout it all though one must never forget that the whole superstructure of Zionism rests upon one fundamental tenet: deception of all non-Jews whoever and wherever they may be. If, as others are suggesting, Ezra Levant is, in fact, a Zionist (I personally haven’t seen any admission of this to date) then whatever comes out of his mouth must be measured against the yardstick of truth about what Political Zionism really represents, not only in terms of Canada but in terms of the rest of the world, for it is the globe, as primary target, that is now, and has been for the last century and more, directly in the sights of the Zionist’s propaganda gun barrel. To deny this or dismiss it as “conspiracy theory” (another Zionist catch-all phrase designed to further deceive earnest seekers after truth in history) is to fall further into the trap that the majority of Canadians have lived all their lives; a trap for the most part so subtle and invisible that average Canadians never realize the magnitude or the identity of the chains that have held them in mental and financial servitude throughout their lives.

Let us be quite clear about some things which Levant isn’t saying. It was the “Official” Jewish lobby groups who have been responsible for sneaking into legislation the infamous Sec. 13(1). It was the former Zionist Jew “Canadian” Minister of Justice, Irwin Cotler who was, and still is, behind this Zionist infiltration of our federal government, aided and abetted by the overwhelming preponderance of Zionist Jew Supreme Court Justices within our federal judiciary who have worked with deceptive diligence in bringing about all this draconian legislation which they, in their typical Talmudic, elitist hubris, never thought might backfire on them at some point in the future.

These are the culprits in this maniacal melodrama who, now that they’ve been caught with their proverbial pants down, are attempting to shine, with full, high-beam intensity, their media floodlights into the eyes of the Canadian public in yet another attempt to blind us, like innocent deer upon a midnight highway, into believing that it’s all the fault of those “jihadists” and “terrorists” from Iraq and Iran and Palestine and Afghanistan and elsewhere that Canadians are now having their basic human right to freedom of speech threatened. Nothing could be further from the truth.

Warman, who is but another dupe for these Zionist forces, will eventually get caught in the crossfire and crash and burn along with all the other front men and women like Dean Steacy and Sandy Kozak, et al. It’s an age old, repetitive story for those who’ve taken the time to research the wonders that comprise this ancient Pharissaic, Talmudic scheme to destroy the sovereign nation states of the world and along with it create yet another final and global holocaust, only this time one where the Zionists get the deluded, mind-controlled “christians” to take up arms against the people of Mohammedan faith in a mutual conflagration of fire that will supposedly fulfil Biblical prophecy and, unbeknownst to the christian dupes, usher in a New World Order of Zionist Jew dictatorship and global slavery.

Part of this subterfuge is Warman’s suing of Levant, the National Post, its editor Jonathan Kay, and four of Canada’s most fanatical and pro-Israel Gentile bloggers, Kathy Shaidle, Kate McMillan and Connie and Mark Fournier who, as Levant so graciously states, are part of the “free speech” loving Jews’ “righteous Gentile allies”.

When all this complaining of hatred toward Jews and citizens of Israel first came down upon my head back in November of 2007 and I became aware of other blogs also being harassed. One of them was Connie and Mark Fournier’s forum known as “FreeDominion.ca”. I registered on the site and as a contributing member and a N.T. Christian, I felt morally duty-bound to try and alert my fellow brothers and sisters to the forces ultimately responsible for the legal dilemma that they were caught in.

It quickly became apparent that FreeDominion.ca was not as “Free” as it touted itself to be. What was most obvious were the Israeli flags flying everywhere and the standard “6 million” victims  of the Hun propaganda flashing before one’s eyes. Like all things Zionist it wasn’t what it purported to be. It wasn’t a true Christian site but in actuality a pro-Israeli, pro-Zionist disinformation site designed to further the aims and asp-irations of the Zionist Jews who had control of the minds of its members. I soon noted that anyone who expressed anything contrary to the Zionist line of linear, apocalyptic thinking was usually browbeaten and intimidated into some small corner where they eventually slithered out under the door and disappeared from sight. Immediately upon my mentioning Zionists the attacks began in earnest and I was treated, as all Zionists treat real Christians and non-Jews, like a leper and a deluded “wing nut” and “conspiracy theorist”, etc.

Being earnest, polite, civil and dedicated to serving truth I “Gentilely” persisted in my efforts to debate the issue of Zionism. The result? First denial, then rage and ad hominem epithets and mutterings and complaints from members about usavory sorts such as myself being allowed on the forum and then finally, unceremoniously, I was banned from the site without warning by the good “christian” folks who run it. I now refer to it as the “NotSoFreeDominion.ca” forum. Another victory for the Zionist infiltrators of the true Christian faith. Sad but, alas, true.

Levant, of course, for all his rhetoric about the other Jews who are lovers and defenders of “free speech” and throughout all his tirades against the “Official” Jews and the Muslims, somehow always fails to mention that when Ernst Zundel was being high-jacked out of the USA and incarcerated here in Canada and tortured and abused by Canadian authorities and then sent off to rot in a Zionist-Jew controlled German dungeon that we heard diddley squat from these so-called lovers of “free speech”. The same when Malcolm Ross was being dragged through the courts and abused and mistreated. The same with Doug Collins and Terry Long and Paul Fromm and Mark Lemire and David Icke and all the other nameless (white, non-Jewish) victims of this Boshevik/Zionist “Star Chamber” charade who have been intimidated and fined and jailed and harassed and abused and bad-mouthed and vilified and libeled by these same Zionist forces who own and control our so-called “Canadian” mainstream media and have used it as a weapon against Christian and non-Jewish dissidents for decades upon decades.

Now, all of a sudden, in the tinkle of a keyboard, we have all these “free speech” loving Jews who are suddenly and pompously adamant and filled with righteous indignation over the fact that some of them and their deluded lackeys are being subjected to the very same injustice that the rest of us have had to suffer in vain and silence for years and years. This type of behaviour, is, I would humbly suggest, stuff of which bigotry and hypocrisy are made of.

Finally. After all his hullabaloo about the “Official” Jews Levant still has the chutzpah to attempt one last defence of the B’nai Brith, one of the oldest and most provocative and sinister organizations ever to grow legs and arms and wield its censorship club about the North American continent. These so-called “Children of the Covenant” are, as Jesus Christ so aptly put it, of the “synogogue of Satan”, “vipers” and “serpents” and “hypocrites” who will use whatever method of calumny and vituperative sleaze available to them to libel and harass and imprison and silence those who criticize their racist, apartheid policies being carried out in the “homeland” of Israel, land stolen via the same nefarious methods from the Arab people of the Middle East.

But, alas, I cannot, at this point and in good conscience, condemn Ezra Levant fully for some of the errors he is making. Whether it is conscious on his part or just plain ignorance of all the facts I truly do not know. He is a young man of 36 years, the same age as my oldest daughter and when I was 36 I too was unaware of the degree of involvement in global politics that the Zionists actually represented. It took me close to sixty years to finally figure it out so in that context there is always hope that a bright young man like Ezra Levant, a protégé of The Fraser Institute and as Michael Walker, Executive Director for said organization once remarked in a Preface to Ezra’s first book, Youthquake, (1996) published when he was just 24 years of age, “It is written by one of the brightest student interns ever to work at The Fraser Institute. It is important because of the insights it provides into the mind-set of the next generation of Canadian leaders. For, certainly, Ezra Levant is going to be a Leader.”

Well Ezra, if you are going to be a “Leader” here in Canada then you are going to have to hit the books some more and get a much firmer grasp on the issue of Political Zionism and learn how this alien and anti-Christian Talmudic doctrine is affecting the Canadian landscape. It behooves you to understand the primary motives of those who are determined to turn this nation into another Communist gulag. Not just for the sake of those “individual” Jews who love “freedom of speech” but for the rest of us non-Jew Canadians who also cherish these very same ideals.

———

CANADA DAY, JULY 1, 2008: A SHORT STATEMENT FROM RADICAL PRESS

So today is Canada Day, 2008. It was traditionally a day in which Canadians gathered to celebrate the freedom and the opportunity this once proud and independent nation stood for in a world fraught with war, strife and uncertainty. Now, I’m certain that Canada is not the same place that I grew up in.

During the course of my lifetime, (born in February of 1947) which spans roughly the last six decades of Canadian history and, ironically, that of the development of the state of Israel, (born in May of 1948) I have witnessed a steady decline in Canada’s sovereignty and in our loss of many of the basic rights and freedoms that this once great nation won over the course of two world wars fought within the framework of the first half of the 20th Century.

These two events, I propose, are not disconnected. The advent of the Zionist state of Israel set the stage for a global assault upon the integrity and well-being of all former free nations within the western democracies and Canada was no exception to this onslaught against national independence.

Sixty years later we see a world in a state of constant stress and anxiety, daunted and intimidated by so-called world powers whose administrative infrastructures have been usurped by the Zionists forces which first gained legitimized recognition sixty years ago thanks to the very international organization (the United Nations Organization UNO) which they, the Zionists, hiding behind the mask of Communism, were effective in establishing in the USA in 1945.

The invasion of the American republic was the second major, world-altering victory over once sovereign democratic nations and it began in earnest during the days of Roosevelt’s tenure as President of the United States of America. The first, of course, being the former Russia empire which the Zionist Jews managed to capture and then destroy after the 1917 coup and the subsequent slaughter of the Romanov dynasty and approximately 66 million Christian and non-Christian victims who stood in the way of the Zionist agenda for global dominance.

These are but brief highlights but they are high points in the never-ending, relentless serge by the Zionist forces to destroy all sovereign nations on the planet and bring in a one world governing body that will effectively establish a global slave system to the Rothschild money syndicate and the Talmudic-inspired aspirations of the Zionists to enslave all the non-Jewish peoples of the planet.

It took me close to 60 years to figure out the Master Plan of this psychopathic group of power-crazed maniacs but once the truth dawned upon me all the former fog of doubt and confusion of ideas dissipated as quickly as the dew upon a morning field of flowers when the sun’s rays finally bathed it in clear light. Thus began my personal quest to expose what I had learned over the years regarding the state of not only my country but that of others who, likewise, were also suffering under the same yoke of subversive infiltration wrought by these very same Zionist forces.

As certain as day follows night the agents of darkness didn’t take too long to begin their assault upon me and my website http://www.radicalpress.com when their spies in cyberspace became cognizant of the fact that there was someone willing to expose their nefarious agenda on the world wide web.

Thus followed the “complaint” to the Canadian Human Rights Commission by the commissars of communism i.e. the B’nai Brith, one arm of an unholy trinity of subversive bodies, set up in Canada and elsewhere around the world to monitor and control all information within the media that relates to the domestic and foreign policies of the Israeli apartheid state, and my subsequent and continuing battle with these alien agents of evil to retain my inherent right to express my opinions and those of my fellow compatriots on this vital issue of national concern.

Canada, in 2008 is under attack. Aliens have landed in Ottawa and taken over our federal government and are in the process of worming their way into every facet of Canadian life. Their purpose is to destroy this once proud and independent country and if Canadians don’t soon wake up to the fact and get off their complacent asses and do something about it it won’t be long before our Maple Leaf transforms itself into the Star of David and we lose all the freedoms and the dignity that we once possessed as an independent, sovereign nation.

For a free and sovereign and independent Canada I remain,

Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
radical@radicalpress.com
http://www.radicalpress.com
“Digging to the root of the issues since 1998”
——————————————————-

Dear Editor:

The disgraceful Bill C 51 is made under the pretense of health, safety & benefit of the people. They are making it look like the people aren’t intelligent enough to decide for themselves what health products etc. they choose. They are trying to take away our right of choice which any good free country would have for the people but in reality C51 has nothing to do with health, safety of the people of which anyone in touch with reality would figure out.

The reality of Bill C51 is it’s all just bullying by the medical pharmaceutical corporations for money & control. Passing that bill would be to the degradation & shame of the nation which is considered to be a free nation where our freedoms such as freedom of choice to chose medical drugs or alternative herbs etc., on our own or by a practitioner and freedom of speech and the will of the people is totally disregarded.

If they take all our freedoms of choice & speech away then we are left with nothing; we can no longer be a nation able to consider ourselves proud to be a Canadian and if I went to a first of July parade I would carry the flag upside down to show our nation is in great distress and lower my head showing the great loss of national integrity & respect for it’s people.

Jack Cutting