RadicalPress.com | AAA+ Replica Watches | Designer Replica Rolex Diamond Watches 2023

One Gentile man’s failed attempt at bridging the gap between the the non-Jewish Canadian public and the Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians.
‘The first fifty years of ‘the Jewish century’ have had their natural effect on the Jewish soul, which once again is in violent unrest. They have made chauvinists of a mass of Jews who, a hundred and fifty years ago, seemed committed to involvement in mankind. They are once more in captivity (the recurrent ‘captivities’ of the Jews were always captivity by the elders and their creed of exclusion, not by alien taskmasters). In the Zionist captivity, and under the pressure of the elders, they have been made into the most explosive force in recorded history. The story of this century, of its wars and revolutions and the denouement yet to come, is that of Talmudic chauvinism, which has its roots in Deuteronomy.’ Douglas Reed, The Controversy of Zion, Ch. 45, The Jewish Soul
The struggle to find common ground with Jewish chauvinism in a world dominated by over a century of clandestine Zionist influence is both a daunting and challenging task.
As a Canadian-born citizen of English and Ukrainian ancestry I, like most other Canadians, grew up in a socio-cultural world that was already well advanced in its acceptance of, and submission to, Zionist propaganda; so advanced in fact that we were generally unaware of its nature or its subconscious effects upon our then young and malleable minds.
Throughout my formative school years in the 50s and 60s I had come to believe, like most Canadians, that the Jews were a downtrodden group of hapless victims of Nazi atrocities and that even to mention the name, i.e. ‘Jew’ required a conscious effort in order to avoid being misconstrued as a racist, bigot or an ‘anti-Semite’. (The term ‘neo-Nazi’ would later become another of the standard epithets employed by the Zionists). Because of this subtle manipulation via the education process and the media, average Canadians of my generation rarely, if ever, broached the subject of the Jews and political terms such as ‘Zionism’ of course were as rare as hen’s teeth in common, everyday discussions of current events.
This Zionist-induced program of mendacious mind-control, which had its beginnings in the propaganda workings of the B’nai Brith and its 1913 offshoot, the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), was to continue unabated throughout the latter half of the 20th Century and it wasn’t until the onset of the personal computer and the internet that discussions surrounding this sinister, covert operation began to appear on the web.
Even after decades of engagement in political analysis of varying issues when I first began publishing the alternative monthly newspaper, The Radical, in June of 1998, I was still not aware of the magnitude of the hoax that the Zionists had orchestrated over the past century and it wasn’t until the process of publishing and researching finally awoke me to this fact that I suddenly came to the rude awakening of what had actually been going down throughout the whole of my lifetime and the lifetime of my parents’ generation as well.
And so, when on November 17th, 2006 an article titled, ‘Open Letter to the Jewish Communities of Canada’ came across my news screen regarding a newly-formed group here in Canada calling themselves the Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians I was both pleasantly surprised and interested.
By all appearances, after reading the Open Letter, it seemed to be just the voice that I had been waiting for years to hear; a Made-in-Canada, Jewish alternative to the one-sided, pro-Zionist perspective that the Canadian Jewish Congress (CJC) and their affiliate organizations the B’nai Brith and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), were incessantly presenting to the Canadian public via their monopoly media. It was obvious to people like myself that whenever it came to information related to the tragic injustices existing in Palestine and the Middle East in general that Israel could never do wrong.
Finally, I thought, a group of Jews who have risen above the lies, hypocrisy and the lock-step ideology of the political Zionists and are willing to break from the traditional, status quo mindset in order to expose the horrors and the genocide being perpetrated against the Arabs.
I immediately posted the Open Letter on my site at http://www.radicalpress.com/?p=261 and, at the same time, made the decision that I would contact this nascent alliance of liberated Jews and offer my assistance, in whatever manner, to help them in their quest for recognition and in their efforts to help the Palestinian people.
My reasons for taking such a step, I felt, weren’t too out of line. Having been a left activist for forty years or more, associated with Jews through marriage for thirty and a publisher of an alternative newspaper and website for close to a decade it seemed natural that I might be able to act in some intermediary fashion to help bridge the gap between those within the Jewish community in Canada and the rest of the population.
And so I applied to join the new yahoo group for the ACJC http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ACJC2006 and was accepted.
I decided to wait awhile and read some of the announcements and submissions to the group before, with mild trepidation, introducing myself. Then, on November 19, 2006 I sent the following email to the ACJC:
‘Dear ACJC members.
Greetings. I am a recent member from B.C. who joined the group after reading the initial letter sent by your organizers to the CJC.
Like some previous comments to the group from other Canadians I was heartened by the fact that those within the Canadian Jewish community who understand the situation in the Middle East to be more than what meets the eye of the average Canadian via his news media have taken the initiative to organize and speak out publicly against the discrepancies in reporting.
Not being Jewish myself but having family ties via my Jewish wife of close to 30 years I take an avid interest in what is transpiring in Israel, the Middle East in general and throughout the Jewish Diaspora globally.
As well, having been in the publishing industry for a number of years as a member of the alternative media I’ve had ample opportunity to study and research the ever-growing interest in the phenomenon known as Political Zionism. As I understand it that aspect of Jewish political life is what predominates throughout most current discussions involving Israel and Palestine and beyond.
My support for Palestine during these trying times might be best summed up in Gilad Atzmon’s talk which I am including in this initial submission to the group.
I welcome comment and look forward to assisting the group to become a strong voice for a just and peaceful world for all peoples.
Arthur Topham’
The article in question by Gilad Atzmon was entitled, ‘Palestinian Solidarity Discourse and Zionist Hegemony’ and was the substance of a lecture he had recently given in Scotland.
On Nov. 24, 2006 I received the following reply from the ACJC group moderator ‘Abraham (eibie) Weizfeld’ saalaha @fokus.name :
To Radical Press:
Thanking you for your interest in the ACJC I have forwarded your contribution to the discussion and news List JUNITY of the ACJC with these comments following;
As for the writings of Gilad Atzmon, he presents problems which are incompatible with the nature of the ACJC.
For example, he states ‘Zionism is a continuation of Jewishness’ and that,
‘1. If Israel, the ‘Jews Only State’ is wrong for being a racially orientated adventure, then ‘Jews for peace’, ‘Jews against Zionism’, ‘Jewish Socialists’, ‘Jews Sans Frontieres’ etc. are all wrong for the very same reason (being a racially orientated adventure).’ which means that he is opposed to the existence of the ACJC, evidently.
Atzmon is obsessed by Zionism to the extent that he cannot distinguish between that ideological current and the Jewish People per se. He is ignorant of the various other Jewish currents of thought that have and continue to exist such as the Autonomists, the Bundist and the Communists as well as other leftist currents such as the Trotskyists and Anarchists. All of these are Jewish despite the flawed definitions of Marx and Zionism.
The fact that he opposes the formation of Jewish dissident organizations is an indication that he does not serve the interests of acting in defence of the Palestinian People.
Abraham Weizfeld
Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians
Somewhat taken aback by Mr. Weizfeld’s cool and matter of fact response I nonetheless replied the next day with the following:
‘Dear Abraham.
Thank you for writing and sending along your comments on Gilad Atzmon’s talk.
While I may not agree with your assessment of Atzmon’s work I do appreciate the fact that you took a moment to respond.
Also, I believe I was in error in thinking that the ACJC group was a place to send such articles and comments. I gather from what you’ve said that it would be better to join the JUNITY group? Is it open to non Jews?
Regards,
Arthur Topham
Radical Press’
Abraham Weizfeld then sent the following terse reply:

Radical Press,
You are mistaken to be taking my comments as an assessment.
The quotes I provided indicate that this piece of writing is opposed to the existence of the ACJC.
Am I mistaken in that respect or not?
As for JUNITY, that is the same question again is it not?
Please provide a site address for the Radical Press or an appropriate description.
Abraham Weizfeld
I then sent another reply to Mr. Weizfeld with the following comments:
‘Dear Abraham.
Again thank you for writing.
I feel you are mistaken about Atzmon’s quote regarding the various left groups in that you have overlooked one important word in his remark i.e. ‘if’.
‘If Israel, the ‘Jews Only State’ is wrong for being a racially orientated adventure, then ‘Jews for peace’, ‘Jews against Zionism’, ‘Jewish Socialists’, ‘Jews Sans Frontieres’ etc. are all wrong for the very same reason (being a racially orientated adventure).’
As the old saying goes, ‘If wishes were horses beggars would ride’. The same holds true for what Atzmon is saying. Now whether or not this is the case is another story and one that I believe requires greater discussion. By simply dismissing him outright because you are assuming that his comment is categorical rather than a suggested possibility is not giving a fair hearing to that particular remark nor to all that he says in the piece….’
Arthur Topham
I then went on to ‘provide’ the additional information i.e. my website at http://www.radicalpress.com which Mr. Weizfeld requested of me, ignoring the obvious curt manner in which he was presenting himself and his group.
Following these initial discussions I also applied to join the JUNITY-CANADA junity [email protected] discussion group with hope that it might prove more receptive than my first encounters with the ACJC. I was accepted into the discussion group without a problem but also found that this group was also being moderated by Mr. Weizfeld.
Then, on the 26th of November I received the following email from Mr. Weizfeld:
To: Radical Press
Thank-you for your response and explanations.
To take up the discussion that you present I would begin with the response to the last question that you have posed wrt [with respect to?]the JUNITY news List.
There is no problem with your membership in the JUNITY List and the point I made was simply a note to the effect that JUNITY is also a Jewish organization as is the ACJC and its List. As such the objection still stands since the ‘if’ that you refer to is a common assessment of all concerned in this discussion. As such it is evident that the accusation is being made against any and all Jewish organizations as well as if we are all a ‘racially orientated adventure’. That is the logical consequence of the words of Atzmon. It is not a matter of feeling, it is only his logical consequence. He would likely confirm his argument if questioned.
I notice in your web site that you have featured Israel Shamir. At least I should thank you for not having included Ernest Zundel but you should be aware of the anti-Jewish formulations propagated by Israel Shamir. You have likely not noticed this inclination of his since you have not noticed the same in the words of Atzmon. Nonetheless this is a crucial point to address.
Abraham Weizfeld’
After reading Mr. Weizfeld’s acerbic reply, compounded by his additional negative comments about Israel Shamir and Ernst Zundel, I knew for a certainty that I was not making a favourable impression upon this person!
But not only that. Here was Abraham Weizfeld, the Acting Administrative Secretary for the Alliance of Concerned Jewish Canadians, moderator of the ACJC and JUNITY-CANADA yahoo groups and the public contact for an organization that, ostensibly, in its Open Letter to Jewish communities throughout Canada, had stated, ‘It is time for those of us [Jews] who have a different vision to come forward publicly to present our views to the Canadian Jewish community and to the people of Canada…For these reasons we have joined together to create a cross-Canada alliance of Jewish anti-occupation forces and to make our case both within the Jewish community of Canada and before the general public.’
My immediate impression was that this person was ill-fitted for such an ambassadorial position. Assuming a dogmatic and suspicious position from the start I could not imagine how such behaviour would go over with the majority of the Canadian public. It certainly did not bode well for an all-inclusive position with respect to other non-Jewish groups who might be working for peace for Palestinians.
In a further comment by Weizfeld to another group member at this time, Stephen Aberle, who had also disagreed with his harsh assessment of Gilad Atzmon, Weizfeld wrote:
‘If Atzmon wants to believe that the Zionist claim is valid, that is his problem.
If Atzmon and Israel Shamir want to declare all Jewish identified organizations as Zionist then again that is their problem not ours.
The credibility of discounting the existence of Jewish organizations on a Jewish oriented List is nil and I would refer one to the original piece to verify that this is a serious issue of denial of Jewish identity based on the excuse of dismissing Zionism. Is this not a shame!
Surely one could not consider JUNITY or the ACJC to ‘being a racially orientated adventure’.
Abraham Weizfeld’[1]
In response to Stephen Aberle’s comments I posted the following remarks on the JUNITY-CANADA list:
‘Dear Stephen.
…I must concur with your appraisal of Atzmon’s article. I have been reading and publishing his work for some time now and find his perspective to be very refreshing, relative to the sometimes deep, complex intellectual summations that tend to surface during political debates.
Too, I personally see the subject of Political Zionism as very much the key to unlocking the doors to our perception of how the present world works behind the scenes cast upon the screens of our televisions and the pages of our mainstream media.
Abraham’s comment that Atzmon is ‘obsessed with Zionism’ resonates with me but possibly not in the same context. Having studied this topic in detail for a few years I sometimes wonder how anyone who truly wants to delve to the bottom of the question of political control wouldn’t become obsessed with Zionism in some manner when they realized the extent to which it overshadows much of our present dilemma both in the Middle East and around the world generally.
As I see it Zionism was created for the purpose of not only establishing a beach head in the Middle East for corporate and ideological marauding but also as a vehicle for surreptitious lobbying and the of gaining financial and political control of foreign governments over time. Bluntly put the notion of a Homeland for victimized Jews was more of a ruse for the general public and secondary to Zionism’s main purpose.
Also, I find it very interesting that since the Lebanon war the topic of Zionism has virtually exploded upon the world like some sudden and unexpected incendiary giving rise to an unprecedented amount of publicity on the issue and presenting Jews around the globe with a collateral problem of how to justify and/or defend oneself from the multitude of negative reactions to what is being perceived as a viable threat not only to peace in the ME but to global stability as well.
It’s a very very complex issue indeed not to mention one steeped in emotional and spiritual attachments.
Thanks for your comments Stephen.
Arthur Topham‘
Returning to Mr. Weizfeld’s comments which he made regarding my website and its contents I quickly realized that he had made but a cursory check on the numerous articles posted there. The truth of the matter was that I did in fact have information posted on Ernst Zundel and other political prisoners locked up by the Zionists and so being a conscientious publisher I chose to enlighten Mr. Weizfeld on that account and therefore wrote him back on Nov. 28th, 2006 with the following comments:
Dear Abraham.
Sorry for the delay in replying to the comments below. Work, extreme cold weather, etc.
You wrote: ‘I notice in your web site that you have featured Israel Shamir. At least I should thank you for not having included Ernest Zundel but you should be aware of the anti-Jewish formulations propagated by Israel Shamir. You have likely not noticed this inclination of his since you have not noticed the same in the words of Atzmon. Nonetheless this is a crucial point to address.’
I’m afraid you didn’t look far enough into my site as I do include information on Ernst Zundel and every other political prisoner and Revisionist who is in jail for either questioning Authority in general or asking for proof on whatever issue they may feel is important. As a Bundist I’m surprised that you would hold to such an opinion.
Are we to imprison people for questioning the nature, purpose and design of the Zionists? Isn’t it bad enough that those who do are already considered to be anti-Semitic? Considering what the Bolsheviks did to those who didn’t conform to their ideology I would think that we had progressed well beyond such dangerous confines….
Arthur Topham
While these exchanges were going on I had also informed Mr. Weizfeld privately that I was an Anarchist. His response to my disclosure that I carried articles on the Revisionists and was also an Anarchist was contained in the following reply of Nov. 28, 2006:
‘To: Radical Press [ [email protected] ]
One cannot be both a revisionist and an anarchist. You are very confused and should reconsider political activity.
…Presenting Ernest Zundel as a legitimate critique or anti-Zionist when he is a self-declared neo-Nazi or Nazi sympathizer is part of the revisionist trip of Holocaust trivialization. This is all part of propagation of hatred towards the Jewish People and not a matter of freedom of speech, a point well understood by the German People who do not tolerate pro-Nazi insanity.
Consequently you are banned from the JUNITY LIST. You have joined Israel Shamir in his ouster from the Al-Awda-unity List and the Association for One Democratic State. Now you have the message but are you able to understand it. [underline and bold are mine. A.T.]
AW‘
Well so much for crossing the great divide between supposedly pro-Palestinian Jewish Canadians and the rest of the country and helping to mediate any increase in solidarity! I had come up against the same abyss that so many others had encountered when attempting to navigate safe passage from an open-minded, inclusive perspective on global politics to the shores of an isolated and fear-ridden ideology that refused to accept any perspectives that collide with this entrenched Zionist worldview. Realizing that I had now been consigned to the same fate as Gilad Atzmon and Israel Shamir and would therefore be unable to present any counter argument to the JUNITY-CANADA group I penned one further reply to Mr. Weizfeld which I sent to him on Nov. 29, 2006.
Dear Abraham.
Thank you for your reply to my last email.
I must say in all honesty that your knee-jerk reaction to my comments, freely given, doesn’t come as a surprise. From the outset of my request to join both the ACJC and the JUNITY group your manner of communicating has been cold and mistrusting; hardly encouraging traits for a moderator who has chosen to take an active role in attempting to convey to both Jewish Canadians and non-Jewish Canadians as per the ‘Open Letter to the Jewish Communities of Canada’ an ‘alternative vision’ to that of the present leaders of Israel, the Harper government and the CJC.
I have been a free-thinking individual for 60 years now and my study of Anarchism and also my life’s experiences both confirm that a person who IS FREE to think will not condemn others to prison cells because their opinions and ideas happen to be different from one’s own. So for you to say that one cannot be a revisionist and an anarchist is both meaningless and illogical. The purpose of debate is to allow for all civil discourse and to either defeat offending or differing positions amiably via the use of reason and fact or to realize the error of one’s own position and thus revise one’s ideas. From your behavior I must assume that you have never revised your perspective on the issues which confront you.
Also, I’m not sure what gives you the right to judge me or anyone for that matter on issues of thought especially considering your reactionary response to my open and honest dealings with you. From what I’ve observed thus far you carry a glaring degree of mistrust and it’s reflected in your approach to those who don’t fit into your particular ideological cubicle. Again, hardly assets one would wish to see in a person who is basically acting as an online ambassador for the alternative Jewish community in their dealings with the rest of us Canadians.
In your previous email you expressed thanks that I wasn’t carrying any articles on Ernst Zundel on my website as if you were some sort of self-appointed censor working for the ADL or B’nai Brith. I could have left you in your blindness but instead, and correctly, I pointed out to you that I do, in fact, carry articles on political prisoners of thought and otherwise and then, you react to my honesty, by claiming that I’m trying to portray him as an anti-Zionist which I never did. I ought, though, to have emphasized the fact that it was Jews who have imprisoned him and it is Jewish-induced legislation which is powering such censorship of free expression both here in Canada and abroad and inflicting such gross and unjust sentencing upon people innocent of any real crime. These are the new realities that both alternate thinking Jews and non-Jews are facing and your erasure of me from the group for having the audacity to be open and frank (in a private email to you no less!) does not bode well for the future of your newly found group. One final thought with respect to Revisionists like Ernst Zundel. You, Abraham, are turning a blind eye to the Zionist control of the present German government when you fail to acknowledge that fact and try to suggest that it is the ‘German People’ who are perpetuating this fraud of blatant injustice.
I’m afraid Abraham that it is you who may be confused. What does banning me from the JUNITY list accomplish for either the Jews or non-Jews of Canada or the current victims of Israeli aggression i.e. the Palestinian people which you and your group purport to support? Nothing. You’re doing precisely what you ought not to be doing during times like this when, as you further state in your open letter, ‘all Jewish people are tainted by default with the fallout from such policies’ as those being committed by the Jewish state. The facts are growing daily; facts which expose both the Zionist agenda within Israel and without in most of the Western world and it behooves those of us who are cognizant of these facts to try and mitigate their ultimate effects should said policies ever reach the dreadful fruition which they are bound to if left unchecked.
I believe there are Jews within your community who realize this and are willing to adopt a more open attitude toward ideas and answers (and questions) that for many still carry a too emotive quality for them to consider rationally. Much of that mindset is but a measure of the last century of purposeful Zionist influence upon both World Jewry and the non-Jewish world. Mind control affects everyone Abraham. This is likely the greatest challenge facing all of us who want to change the world back to a more sane and harmonious balance and your abrupt and, quite frankly, short-sighted dismissal of a new member who requested admission for the sole purpose of mutual aid sets an old but familiar tone which is not helpful in the least.
My offer to collaborate and work with the group has been met with insults, judgment and an overbearing sense of know-it-all-ness from yourself. How is that sort of behavior supposed to be interpreted by someone who has spent the last forty years of his life fighting and struggling for human equality and freedom? How is that sort of reception supposed to assist me in my own dealings with those who see ALL Jews as sinister, right-wing, blood thirsty co-conspirators involved in a madcap attempt to take over the world? The growing sense of the ‘Jewish Conspiracy’ in the minds of the general public will not be quelled by Zionist-style legislation which imprisons individuals for expressing their views. That only ends up exacerbating the growing problem. What’s required Abraham is the humble acknowledgement that maybe, just maybe, the Jews will have to break out of their self-imposed cocoon-consciousness and start treating others as they themselves would prefer to be treated and to respect diversity and equality for all humans.
If you are representative of the type of Jew who wishes to convince the average Canadian that you are being open and honest and transparent in your desire to achieve peace and justice in the M.E. then I fear you are fated to fail for, by example, your initial reactions to my overture of assistance is a pathetic example of diplomacy and cannot but lead to further confusion and mistrust among a Canadian public that is waxing in its understanding of the controversy known as Zion.
It took me close to 60 years to figure out how the Zionists had been instrumental in brainwashing my generation of Canadians and for much of that time I was completely unaware of their actual existence. But once the nature of their game is realized the pieces of the puzzle fall into place with little effort. Its only then it seems that the magnitude of their ambitious scheme begins to dawn on one and thus the importance of exposing it.
So….alas, maybe Gilad Atzmon was correct in his assessment of certain ‘left’ Jewish orgs especially the ACJC and it’s exclusive JUNITY list. Just another Gatekeeper for the Zionists hidden behind the rhetoric of the day. But even that may not be correct. Maybe it’s just you Abraham who is perpetuating this notion as you fulfill your role as Gatekeeper for the ACJC and the JUNITY list. I wonder how the rest of the members would feel about your arbitrary decision to ban me based upon my openness and the fact that the Radical Press would carry contentious articles and alternative views? Would you have the courage to post this reply to them?
In closing I must say that under the present circumstances I cannot even wish you well in your endeavor to reach out to the greater Canadian community for I now realize that your modus operandi may be no different than that of the Israel government of which you incessantly cry foul. Methinks sometimes you cry too much and too loudly to be believed. All of what you personally are doing (as in my case) only accents the inevitable end that you are preparing for yourself and your group if such an attitude doesn’t change.
Now YOU have the message from a non-Jewish Canadian regarding your project. Hopefully you will understand what I am trying to convey to you. Or will this be just another case of sad but true? I hope not.
In Peace & Light,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
I never did receive a reply to my last email.

Hungary is making history of the first order along with Iceland & Russia.
Not since the 1930s in Germany has a major European country dared to escape from the clutches of the Rothschild-controlled international banking cartels. This is stupendous news that should encourage nationalist patriots worldwide to increase the fight for freedom from financial tyranny.
• Last Lap Dance For Rothschild: Iceland’s Viking Victory Over The Matrix Banksters!
• President Putin Stamping Out The Rothschild Rockefeller Syndicate Maggots From Russia!
A man holds up a sign during a protest in central Budapest
A man holds up a sign during a protest in central Budapest.
• Coming Home!
• Keep A Jaundice Eye On Silver Price Especially Thru September 2013: Massive Banking Manipulation ~ We Are At The CUSP!
Already in 2011, Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán promised to serve justice on his socialist predecessors, who sold the nation’s people into unending debt slavery under the lash of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and the terrorist state of Israel. Those earlier administrations were riddled with Israelis in high places, to the fury of the masses, who finally elected Orbán’s Fidesz party in response.
According to a report on the German-language website ‘National Journal,’ Orbán has now moved to unseat the usurers from their throne. The popular, nationalistic prime minister told the IMF that Hungary neither wants nor needs further ‘assistance’ from that proxy of the Rothschild-owned Federal Reserve Bank. No longer will Hungarians be forced to pay usurious interest to private, unaccountable central bankers.
Instead, the Hungarian government has assumed sovereignty over its own currency and now issues money debt free, as it is needed. The results have been nothing short of remarkable. The nation’s economy, formerly staggering under deep indebtedness, has recovered rapidly and by means not seen since National Socialist Germany.
mussolini-m_1585240f
• Centralizing America Thru Corporate Banking Power: Remembering Benito Mussolini & Adolph Hitler
The Hungarian Economic Ministry announced that it has, thanks to a ‘disciplined budget policy,’ repaid on August 12, 2013, the remaining €2.2B owed to the IMF—well before the March 2014 due date. Orbán declared: ‘Hungary enjoys the trust of investors,’ by which is not meant the IMF, the Fed or any other tentacle of the Rothschild financial empire. Rather, he was referring to investors who produce something in Hungary for Hungarians and cause true economic growth. This is not the ‘paper prosperity’ of plutocratic pirates, but the sort of production that actually employs people and improves their lives.
obama-communism
• The New World Order is ‘Communism’: Also Known As Rothschildism Or More Bluntly Robbery!
With Hungary now free from the shackles of servitude to debt slavers, it is no wonder that the president of the Hungarian central bank, operated by the government for the public welfare and not private enrichment, has demanded that the IMF close its offices in that ancient European land. In addition, the state attorney general, echoing Iceland’s efforts, has brought charges against the last three previous prime ministers because of the criminal amount of debt into which they plunged the nation.
The only step remaining, which would completely destroy the power of the banksters in Hungary, is for that country to implement a barter system for foreign exchange, as existed in Germany under the National Socialists and exists today in the Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa, or BRICS, international economic coalition. And if the United States would follow the lead of Hungary, Americans could be freed from the usurers’ tyranny and likewise hope for a return to peaceful prosperity.
American Free Press
582254_556211774418740_1561779918_n
Vatican vs Illuminati
Related articles
• Hungary Makes History: Sheds Banksters’ Shackles and Kicks Out the IMF (2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com)
• Hungary Breaks the Banksters Shackles (sgtreport.com)
• Hungary issues debt free money (the-tap.blogspot.com)
• Hungary Sheds Bankers’ Shackles (nalonmit.wordpress.com)
rothschild-thats-all-folks
JACOB ROTHSCHILD
• UFAA: United Front Against ‘Austerity’ aka; ‘Rothschildism’.
• BREAKING => CNN Goldman Sachs & The Rothschild Zionist Matrix: Landmark Case ~ Rothschildism Delineated From Abrahamic Judaism!!
• Obama Putting Tens Of Thousand Muslims To Work In Middle East: Kerry Clears The way For Iraq & Jordan To Sign $18 Billion 1,056 Mile Dual Oil Pipeline Deal To Jordan.
• Most Corrupt Bank In The World ~ Basel III’s HSBC: Engaging In Blackmail Now ~ HSBC Shuts Down Banking Accounts On 40 Sovereign Nation State Embassies! NWO’s Desperate Move In An Attempt To Leverage Nations Into Subservience!
• Dodd Frank & Basel III Enacted Treason Against The United States: Wealth Funneled Into Rothschild’s [BOE] Bank Of England.
• Exposed -> Obama’s Brother Malik Obama: Investor For Muslim Brotherhood’s Money!
• FEMA => Re-Education Camps For Corrupt Politicians: Mitigating The Buffoonery Of The World Gang Association’s Propaganda!
• Russia Tells United States Citizens Not To Give Up Your Guns: We Learned From Experience Fighting Rothschild’s Banking Schemes!
• In The Year 2000 There Were 7 Countries Without A Rothschild-Owned Central Bank: They were Afghanistan, Iraq, Sudan, Libya, Cuba, North Korea and Iran.

Jewish groups in Vancouver say they are considering suing TransLink for accepting controversial political advertisements showing the ‘disappearance of Palestine due to Israeli occupation over the past 66 years.’
On Tuesday, a group called the Palestine Awareness Coalition announced the launch of 15 bus posters and a large mural in a central Vancouver SkyTrain station, that depict the territory of Palestine steadily shrinking into the state of Israel in a succession of dated maps.
Marty Roth a 79-year-old member of the coalition group behind the ad said they have already won a victory over groups that tried to ‘suppress’ the ads.
‘This will be controversial with a number of traditional Jewish organizations that have tried to suppress the ads,’ Roth claimed. ‘But TransLink has refused to agree with them, because these are educational ads that are well within national advertising guidelines and the Canadian Charter (of Rights and Freedoms).’
Roth said, as a Canadian Jewish man, he believes Israel is unjustly oppressing the people of Palestine and his group wants to educate the Canadian public about the conflict.
But Jewish leaders including Mitchell Gropper, chair of the Jewish Federation of Greater Vancouver, called the ads a provocative attack on Jewish people that will incite hatred. ‘This is a grave concern to our community at large, because the ads make use of the buses unwelcome and unsafe,’ Gropper said, noting that terrorist attacks in Israel often target buses.
‘I don’t think I’ve ever seen ads on our TransLink system that attack a section of our society. If the transit system will be used to attack Israel and the Jewish people, who is next?’
Gropper, a Vancouver lawyer, said his group went to the ‘highest levels’ of TransLink and argued the Palestine ads should be rejected, but they were told TransLink must accept the ads for legal reasons.
The Province sought interviews with TransLink officials but were referred to a prepared statement, which says TransLink sought a ‘third-party legal opinion’ with said the Supreme Court of Canada decided TransLink must run ads such as ‘Disappearing Palestine’ under the Canadian Charter.
Gropper said his group has retained a lawyer with a different opinion, and that suing TransLink is one strategy that is being considered in a response to the ads.
‘TransLink has said the law requires them to publish these ads but that is certainly not the case,’ Gropper said.
The Friends of Simon Wiesenthal Center in Toronto issued a statement saying the group is ‘disturbed to learn about TransLink’s agreement to run historically distorted anti-Israel advertisements.’
‘While Israel and the Palestinian Authority are currently engaged in peace negotiations to resolve their differences and reach a two-state solution, TransLink will be running ads that are provocative and incite hatred and contempt,’ said group president Avi Benlolo.
In 2006 TransLink lost a decision to the B.C. Court of Appeal, after trying to refuse political advertisements from the B.C. Teachers Federation of Students. TransLink’s policy of rejecting partisan ads and campaigns likely to cause offence or controversy was overturned.
In the decision, Madam Justice Prowse wrote that B.C. Transit and TransLink ‘sought to prohibit political advertising precisely because it was political. Their aim was to prevent the appellants from exercising their right to freedom of political expression, although they were content to entertain commercial expression.’
The ad campaign cost $15,000 and will remain in place for four months. The wall mural, which debuted at Vancouver City Centre station on Tuesday, drew curious looks from transit users, with many pulling out smartphones to snap a photo.
One woman, who declined to give her name, stopped to examine the ad. She said, while she wasn’t well-versed in the issue, she believes the ad should fall under the category of free speech.
Mohammed Hamid, 45, was one of the many transit users who stopped to snap a photo on his phone. Hamid is from the Middle East and is familiar with the various aspects of the issue being brought up by the ad.
He doesn’t believe the ad was malicious in anyway, but instead, was glad to see it drawing attention.
scooper@the province.com
twitter.com/scoopercooper
with a file from Stephanie lp

We are being poisoned. This mass public poisoning has been going on for over a century, and it has been gradually increasing. You and those you care about are being harmed almost continuously. We are being abused with multiple poisons in small doses on purpose.
The more of us that become aware of some of the most common ways this is happening, the better chance we have of reducing or ending exposure to at least some of the poisons.
Chlorine
This highly toxic chemical warfare agent has been added to public water supplies since about 1910 as a disinfectant. The now common health problems of circulatory disease and cancer became widespread only after the masses started being chlorinated regularly. Drinking it, bathing in it, breathing it and soaking it up in our showers, and consuming it in most food and beverage products made with city water, makes chlorine one of the most common public poisons.
Fluoride
The fluoride added to municipal water and dental care products is not really good for your teeth. It is a cancer causing, apathy inducing, intelligence reducing chemical, a waste product of aluminum and phosphate manufacturing. It was accumulating at production plants in the 1940s and ruining local ground water.
The industry first tried to get rid of excess stocks of fluoride by marketing it as rat poison, but not enough was sold. Then in the 1950s they concocted the scheme of convincing the American Dental Association to recommend it be added to public water supplies and oral care products to harden teeth. In the long run, it actually makes teeth brittle and mottled, while diminishing people’s IQ, minimizing active interests and shortening lives.
Aluminum
Aluminum has long been used in cookware and food service material. As people learned of its toxicity, they started abandoning aluminum pans and avoiding heating food wrapped in foil.
Extremely fine particles of it are the main component of the ‘chemtrail’ sprays disseminated over virtually all areas in North America under the rationale of ‘geo-engineering’ to counter ‘global warming’. Since the concern about global warming from carbon emissions due to human activity is fraudulently promoted to expand control of the population, this widespread chemical spraying is really being done for other reasons, from weather manipulation to public poisoning. The bizarre streaks often sprayed in the sky by aircraft are not normal jet contrails.
Aluminum is another neurotoxin that reduces intelligence and memory. It is considered a major contributor to early senility and dementia.
Mercury & Vaccinations
For the millions of us that received ‘silver’ dental fillings, long term mercury contamination is likely. That highly toxic heavy metal was an ingredient in the amalgam. Mercury is also used in the thimerosal preservative in most vaccines, including those given to children, even infants.
Mercury is another neurotoxin and is blamed for the incredible rise in the numbers of autistic children, many of whom are radically changed within a few days of vaccination.
Vaccinations and flu shots do not really protect us from infections. Rather they are seriously harmful, especially to the infants that receive an overwhelming mixed vaccination cocktail. Further, vaccines are sometimes contaminated with rogue viruses, and are a debilitating stress to the human immune system.
Pharma Drugs
The approval of pharmaceutical medicines by a government agency does not mean that they are safe to take. Many of them have terrible side effects, often blocking biological systems and fostering long-term illness. Then additional drugs are prescribed. Many of the routine medications today are psychotropic, further reducing intelligence and enthusiasm.
Radioactive Fallout
Radioactivity emanating from the Fukushima nuclear plant disaster, as well as from leaks at other nuke facilities, the depleted uranium ammunition used by the military, the radioactive metals such as barium and thorium in the chemtrail sprays, and the lingering particles from the nuclear testing of the 1950s and 1960s, is another major contributor to the cancer epidemic.
Aspartame
The artificial sweetener aspartame is promoted as an ingredient in diet products for weight loss and diabetes. In addition to worsening each of those conditions, it is a terrible neurotoxin. It turns to methanol (toxic wood alcohol) and formaldehyde in the body, impairing the brain, weakening eyesight, damaging the pancreas and liver, and making some people crazy. Why was this poison ever approved for consumption?
Aspartame is now added to even regular chewing gum, as well as to flavored water. Read labels for ingredients to avoid this poison.
MSG
Monosodium Glutamate is used as a flavor enhancer. It is both an ‘excitotoxin’ that stresses cells, and a neurotoxin bothering the brain and nerves. It diminishes intelligence, can cause bloating and digestive distress, and may harm the heart as well.
BPA
Bisphenol Acetate is an estrogen mimicker that is permitted to be in food service and household plastics, including plastic water bottles. This and similar plasticizers such as Bisphenol Sulfone (BPS) are causing sexual imbalances and alterations and cancers of the breast and sex organs.
Glyphosate
This toxic herbicide and other harmful chemicals used in agriculture will not simply wash off of the produce.
Glyphosate is reported to be a factor in both infertility and cancer. Most other agri-chemicals are also debilitating. Glyphosate and other runoff chemicals are commonly found in drinking water as well.
GMOs
Genetically Modified Organisms, usually used in concert with agricultural chemicals, include the common food crops corn, soybeans, canola oil and sugar beets. In the United States, nearly all of each of these widely consumed foods are genetically modified, much of the milk and dairy items contain BgH growth hormone, and most meat animals’ feed contains GMOs, with no indication on labels.
Genetically altered foods are hard on the digestive system, and usually damaging to cells and organs.
EMFs
Electromagnetic fields from cell phones, computers, televisions, ‘smart meters’, transmission wires and towers, etc., are seriously weakening and impairing health in people, animals and plants. The more you have EMF frequencies in proximity, the greater the damage. Use a cell phone sparingly and switch ears often if holding it near the head.
Why Are We Being Poisoned?
We are being systematically POISONED ON PURPOSE, and need to raise awareness about it enough to get it STOPPED.
Why are we being massively exposed to a range of serious poisons while being falsely told that they are not harmful or even good for us? The elite power controllers do this:
• To foster apathy
• To weaken resistance
• To reduce intelligence
• To increase susceptibility to entrainment and hypnosis
• To experiment on an ignorant populace
• To test longevity methods for their benefit
• To develop distracting and incapacitating health problems
• To generate business for the medical industry
• To foster infertility and infanticide
• To cause people to die younger
• To reduce the population
• To eliminate independent small farmers and businesses
• To control food production, weather, land and resources
• To profitably (cheaply) dispose of industrial waste
• To make maximum profits
• To fully control this world
• To secure lasting tyranny
This has been done gradually, stealthily and incrementally.
Learn More
For lists of common public poisons in food, water, and household and personal care products, as well as how to minimize exposure and counter many of the effects, visit: http://PublicPoisons.com.

Jon David Miller is a social analyst, wellness educator, philosopher and singer/songwriter. His education includes a Bachelor of Arts with honors in economics from Ohio University, a Master of Arts in religion and a Master of Divinity from Hartford Seminary, and 40 years of experience in wellness education, business, community organizations, social studies research and writing. Jon is the author of several books, including The New World Order Empire, and developer of several websites, such as www.PublicPoisons.com.

I began construction of our sauna just over thirty years ago in late March of 1983. At the time my wife and I and our three kids we were living in a log cabin that a friend and I had built and being very rustic and owner-built it didn’t have a regular bathroom so we needed some type of bath house.
I had scored the lumber necessary for the building from an old store down in the village of Cottonwood that was being dismantled by a new owner so the price was right (I got it for salvage) and the wood, being mostly rough cut lumber and boards from old growth fir, was perfect for the job and went well with the look of the log cabin too.
SaunaSShot600 copy 2
Actually it became the first of a number of buildings that I designed and put up on the land all of which were based on the gambrel or hip style roof principle.
I decided to put a second story on it rather than wasting the potential storage space and it came out looking rather funky but more than that it was to serve us well in many ways over the ensuing years.
Our roots having been firmly planted in the 60s Hippie generation from that period we’d always planned to return to the land and get out of the city environment and so our little 5-acre ‘small holding’ was just the spot and the way to create a more natural, sustainable and secure lifestyle in order to raise up the kids.
So what are the advantages of having one’s own sauna? Well, after thirty years of experience I can easily say that the first advantage is to one’s overall health (not to mention being one of the best method for getting a close shave!). The sauna is probably the best method of eliminating excess salt and related toxins from the body without the need for extreme physical exertion such as one requires when running or working out in a gym or other similar methods of working out a sweat. Basically all one requires is a water and a fuel source (in our case the sauna is wood fired) and we have an abundance of both of these so maintaining the sauna is very cheap in terms of any outlay of funds.
Inside800
As one can see all that’s required in order to get your hot water is a canner on the top of the wood heater. In our case I was fortunate to find an old wood fired octagonally-shaped heater years ago that someone had discarded in our local refuse site. I managed to get it on the back of my truck and bring it home and set it up in the sauna. It was perfect for the job!
For years now I’ve been going out during the winter months when I had more time and cutting firewood. Since the great infestation of the pine beetle that happened some years ago the woods throughout the central Cariboo have been decimated leaving what must be millions of dead standing pine trees that make excellent firewood for both our home and shop and sauna.
Firewood11.16.05 AM copy
This shot above is typical of my winter wood gathering. I’d go out and fall some dead standing pine as close to the highway as possible and then truck the rounds to the road using my trusty old toboggan and manpower. It cost me a bit of gas for the truck and the chainsaw plus chain oil and a lot of sweat but eventually the wood shed would fill up and we could rest, assured that come hell or high water or -40 or -50 or even -60 degrees Fahrenheit (and we’ve had it drop that low before).
Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.27.45 AM
Winter Security!
Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.25.46 AM copy
Once the rounds of wood are split (again a good way to work up a sweat!) the rest is the luxury that heat, steam and water provides gratis.
The long winter months that we enjoy/endure here in the foothills of the Cariboo Mountains are when the sauna is used the most but as I will shortly explain it is an invaluable tool throughout all seasons. The photo below gives one an idea of what the sauna looks like outside during a cold winter’s evening. Inside of course the environment is exactly the opposite.
Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.40.06 AM
Readers may be wondering by this time what the connection is between the sauna and the unusual title for this edition of Sauna Notes. Well, like all things of late, my lifestyle and my work as a publisher are interrelated in so many ways that it’s impossible to separate them and this includes both the use and value of our sauna during hard times.
As this article is being sent to those on the Radical Press mailing list I needn’t delve into all the finer details concerning my present plight with respect to the ongoing struggle that I am involved in with Canada’s censorship lobby and the Canadian judicial system, both of which are currently attempting to drive me into either drinking or the poor house or worse still, a dungeon. As a result of their terrorization of truth tellers the last seven years of perpetual harassment by the forces of state repression have literally left my dear wife and I chained to a live of poverty due to all the restrictions that prevent me from doing anything else that might add additional sustenance to perpetually challenged larder.
Living on a fixed income that doesn’t cover one’s basic needs such as shelter, fuel, utilities and food is a challenge in itself but when you add to that all the seemingly endless legal shenanigans that one must cope with which require additional expenditure of an amazing amount of time and, yes, money, the equation for survival seems exponential to the point where it sometimes appears overwhelming.
Now here’s the connection. During periods when my pleas for donations become few and far between we still have to eat and pay the normal bills and also feed our chickens and our dogs and cats, all of whom are dependent upon us for their survival as well. In our new house that I built back in 1994 (which replaced the log cabin we once dwelt in) we have a hot water system that is fuelled by a hundred pound propane tank that we must fill approximately once a month. It costs around $90.00 to do that and when we don’t have the money we don’t have hot water running from the tap so, as the saying goes, we then must run for the water instead! Such has been the case for the past three weeks or so. Now this would be very onerous for someone who didn’t have any means whatsoever of producing hot water for all the regular necessities of life including washing clothes, dishes and of course one’s body and that’s where our trusty old sauna suddenly kicks in. While we are (hopefully) temporarily out of propane we can at least still bath and produce hot water for regular domestic use even though it requires (in the case of the house where we also have a wood heater) the necessity of having to physically haul the hot water about in buckets so we can do the normal chores that most people simply take for granted. Thus, as an emergency means of being able to still obtain hot water for our daily needs, the sauna has proven over and over to be a most valuable asset for us.
I’ll conclude with some parting thoughts about this whole issue of having to depend upon others for money. Most folks in the alternative online publishing business are forced to depend upon the gracious beneficence of their readership in order to survive financially. It’s become a way of life for the vast majority of bloggers who are attempting to inform the general public about vital issues and unless one has the financial backing of the larger sites such as DavidIcke.com or Rense.com or others of that category who are able to sell advertising space in order to cover their costs it’s virtually impossible to make money doing what we do. In other circumstances, for example when I would work as a carpenter running such a business, I could easily make sufficient amounts of money to ward off the wolf from my door but in the alternative media that option is basically unavailable as it takes literally 50 to 60 hours a week on the computer to do what I do and I’m still left without the time to get to all the issues and concerns that need to be addressed.
I cannot speak for others but I do know that even after years of hanging out my shingle on the website asking for donations I still sense an uneasiness about having to do it. I feel like some mendicant wandering about with his begging bowl hoping for the means of being able to sustain life and limb so he can continue with his so-called mission in life. That’s the long and the short of it and were it not for those few kind, generous souls who have helped me in a considerable way over the years I would definitely not be doing what I am today. To those kind people who appreciate the value of my work both I and my wife extend our deepest thanks and appreciation.
Screen Shot 2013-08-19 at 11.43.24 AM 2
And so it goes. For all the stress and strain of maintaining Radical Press our little sauna still provides a much needed solace for body, mind and spirit. It’s a perfect way to regain one’s composure and stay healthy. Since building the little hut I’ve probably had less than dozen winter colds over the past thirty years whereas before then I tended to always come down a one or two or more during the winter months. I highly recommend building one if you have the space to do it.
—-
So here’s the clincher. Once again please consider helping me out with a donation if you can. Go to the top of the Home Page at www.radicalpress.com and click on the ‘PLEASE DONATE TO THE RADICAL PRESS FREE SPEECH DEFENSE FUND’ link where you will find all the information necessary to send financial help. Thank you and God bless you.

[EDITOR’S NOTE: Once again B.C.’s former controversial premier Bill Vander Zalm has taken the courageous step of speaking out on an issue that has been plaguing hundreds of thousand of people around the world for close to two decades, the controversial issue of Chemtrail spraying of the earth’s atmosphere. In my own case I cannot thank Bill enough for finally taking this issue by the horns and demanding that government and politicians come clean on what the hell has been going on for so many years. It truly is a major breakthrough in terms of gaining coverage and I would personally like to than Bill for taking this stand.]
Bill Vander Zalm puts politicians on notice
Former Premier of British Columbia acknowledges chemtrails in public letter
Former Premier of British Columbia, Bill Vander Zalm sent the following letter to dozens of politicians across BC
August 14, 2013
We’re told that ‘Global Warming’, now conveniently called ‘Climate Change’, is a threat to Agriculture and therefore an issue of National Security. As a National Security issue, whatever they do to combat climate change, can be kept out of the public domain.
For years, many people have observed, what we were told to be, ‘Con-Trails’ (Airplane engine condensation trails), but different from the contrails as we used to see them. Instead of dissipating quickly, they spread, stayed in the atmosphere for a pro-longed period, and if a lot of them, criss-crossing, caused a more cloudy sky. In the Pacific Northwest, we often suffer cloudy skies, the evidence was not always visible, but many people here, as elsewhere, referred to the cloud forming trails as ‘Chem-Trails’, trails not caused by water condensing but trails full of toxic substances to supposedly fight Global Warming.
In government circles it is referred to as ‘Geo-engineering’, it’s manipulating the earth weather system. Scary stuff, especially when we consider the enormous capabilities of the HAARP technology. For the purpose of our submission, to seek information, Geo-engineering and Chem-Trails are defined as a military-industrial complex program in partnership with private contractors and possibly major fuel suppliers and airline companies, whereby planes spray particulate matter into the atmosphere that would otherwise not be there.
It may seem ‘far-fetched’ to some, but it’s only recently that we found out a Drone can see a human face on the ground, from 10,000 ft. up, that the government can monitor every phone call we make and every email we send and a terrorist can detonate a bomb by using a cell-phone from miles away.
Chem-Trails are said to consist of tiny particles of the very harmful toxins, Aluminum and Barium. Toxins that we inhale, poison our water and kill the soil. We can avoid cancer causing second hand smoke, but there’s no way to avoid the far more toxic particles that fall from the sky. Already diseases like Cancer, Alzheimer, Lou Gehrichs, Huntingtons, Parkinsons, Autism and Bone diseases are at a highest level ever, all of which could be directly linked to Aluminum.
Whenever man manipulates nature, be it for profit or politics, the cost and consequences are horrific. Events like the Hurricanes in the East, the Tornadoes in the Mid-West, the flooding in Toronto, the unprecedented flooding in Calgary, the loss of millions of trees in B.C. due to a pine beetle epidemic, will all be attributed to ‘Mother Nature’ and Climate change and not a mention of Geoengineering.
I would highly recommend that anyone wanting further information, check the internet for well known Neuro Surgeon Dr. Russell L. Blaylock who tells us about Social Engineering by the Elitists, funded by such foundations as ‘Rockefellers’, Ford and Carnegie.
According to documents released by the National Academy of Sciences, the CIA is funding a scientific study to determine the feasibility of altering the planet’s climate, in order to stave off climate change. When a government agency does a study, it might well be to justify activities already in play.
No such activity, as spraying the atmosphere with toxic chemicals could ever take place without government consent, Federally, State or Provincially and without a detailed agreement governing times, places and materials used. The government of Maui, Hawaii is now considering an Ordinance (law) prohibiting the release of aerosols and other particulates into the atmosphere without informed consent from the people of Maui.
Neither Federal, State or Provincial government has ever announced such a ‘Climate Control Program’ nor denied it existed.
I’m aware that any attempt at rationalizing complicated problems will be characterized, by the Elitists and those they control, as Conspiracy theories, and some will be, but this is then used to stop all attempts at creating a public awareness. Not too long ago, mention of governments telephone evesdropping or screening all our emails, would have been tagged as Conspiracy theory at its worst.
(1) I, Bill Vander Zalm, request through ‘Freedom of Information’, both Federal and Provincial, all information on file about ‘Climate Control Programs’ with the government or anyone of its Ministries.
(2) I, Bill Vander Zalm, request that Municipal Councils, City Councils and Regional Boards pass a resolution to say that ‘no particulate matter for climate control be sprayed in the atmosphere above their jurisdiction, without informed consent’ and that the issue be presented to the annual meeting of the Union of Municipalities for debate and consideration this September.
Please help promote this page on the internet!

How tedious, onerous, and evil it all is having to observe Jews like Karen Selick posing as loyal Canadians and lying their face off about Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party of Germany in Jewry’s incessant and brazen bid to exploit to the max the cumulative hatred they’ve spent the past eighty years spreading throughout the world.
Selick and her ilk of pseudo-Left ‘Canadian’ Jews and their ceaseless, vituperative hate-fest against the German people as a whole knows no bounds. Glutted beyond excess with all their depraved Talmudic teachings, brains drenched beyond the point of saturation with vile, satanic enmity toward the German nation, constantly dripping lie upon lie, they’re more than willing to resort to every devious method and venue imaginable in order to perpetuate their venomous bile toward Germany, the German people as a whole and Adolf Hitler’s former government.
One such venue being used to mask their execrable intentions appears to be the Canadian Constitution Foundation (CCF) whose motto reads: Protecting the Constitutional Freedoms of Canadians Through Education, Communication & Litigation. Obviously the CCF’s covert mission, in so far as ‘educating’ Canadians, also includes the ongoing denigration of the German nation through ceaseless vituperations such as those found in the writings of Karen Selick.
KSelickGermanophobe
Of course it’s all pure Zionist bullshit, subterfuge and window dressing, designed to hide the main purpose of pro-Zionist organizations like the CCF, that being the perpetuation of their two greatest LIES of the 20 Century: (1) the Mythical 6 Million Holocaust of Jews by the ‘Nazis’ and (2) the nonstop, psychopathically-driven, mind-control propaganda designed to brainwash generations of people into believing that Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party of Germany (coined ‘Nazis’ by the Jew media during WWII), and, by extension, the German nation as a whole, are the greatest cumulative evil ever to have existed upon this planet.
As a patriotic Canadian nationalist (not of German descent) what’s so exasperating for me is to witness dual-citizen Canadian/Israeli Jews like Selick twisting, then connecting, every injustice ever to have occurred, with the ‘Nazis’ in their eternally cursed attempt to buttress their own inevitable failure to keep the masses of goyim (non-Jew cattle or Gentiles) fixated on Hitler and WWII rather than focussing on the real criminals (both of yesterday and today), those being the terrorist, gangster Rothschild Zionist Jew cartel, the very same entity responsible for fomented WW I and WWII in order to establish their ‘Jews Only’ spiritual ‘Homeland’ in the heart of Arab/Muslim territory and all the subsequent horror and terrorism and genocide of the Palestinian people.
Typical of this specious Zionist Jew propaganda are Selick’s slanderous, libellous, ignorant remarks inserted throughout her recent article posted on the Canadian Constitution Foundation website titled, ‘You Don’t Fight Nazis by Becoming a Nazi Yourself.’ Here are some of her maliciously maligning deceits contained in the German hate propaganda piece:
‘One of the crimes that the Nazis committed against European Jews in the 1930s and ’40s was to legalize, or at least facilitate, the theft of Jewish property, merely because it was owned by people whom the Nazis despised for their religious beliefs.’
‘Wikipedia describes the National Alliance as a ‘white nationalist, anti-semitic, and white separatist political organization.’ In short, they are neo-Nazis. As a Jew, I have no sympathy whatsoever with the National Alliance. They sound vile and loathsome to me.’
‘The Nazis reviled the Jews and their religion, and felt that their revulsion justified them in depriving Jews of their property.’
‘Nazism was evil not merely because it was anti-semitic, but also because it did not respect private property rights. A state that does not respect private property rights is evil like the Nazi state was, even though it may not be motivated by anti-semitism.’
Contentious, convoluted statements such as these are standard Zionist Jew hate literature full of lies, distortions and misrepresentations and presented as if it they were as factual as the rising sun on a clear morning when in truth they resemble more the chemtrail haze that the Rothschild Jews are now spraying over the heads of the unwary goyim around the world in order to poison, weaken and kill off both the natural environment and its useless eaters.
The truth, when distilled from the overflowing vats of Zionist disinformation and out and out lies, is that when Adolf Hitler and the National Socialist Party (NSP) came to power in 1933 via the most open and internationally monitored election in history, World Jewry immediately declared a ‘holy war’ on the Germany nation thus making it virtually impossible for the National Socialists to maintain relations with the various and disparate groups of Jews who at that time were living in Germany.
Setting aside Selick’s silly, scatterbrained sophistry and fallacious reasoning for the moment it’s necessary to point out to the brainwashed bovine masses that the Jewish question in Germany when Adolf Hitler and the NS party gained power was far from simple as Selick would have readers believe. Germany at that time was populated with a large percentage of westernized Jews who had dwelt in Germany for generations and who, for the most part, felt they were first and foremost German citizens over and above their religious beliefs. In other words they had accepted assimilation as a way of life and a large percentage of them were married to Germans of Aryan blood. On top of that many German Jews had fought for Germany during WW I, along side Adolf himself and he wasn’t about to now turn on them just because the Zionists outside of Germany decided to declare war on the German nation. The greatest problem for the NS government was the mass influx of eastern Ashkenazi Jews that had flocked to Germany to escape the Bolshevik Communist Soviet Union and were attempting to exit to either America, Canada of Great Britain.
Ultimately the German government of the day chose to work in cooperation with the Jewish Rabbinate and the Zionist Agency, an organization that was formed to assist in the peaceful migration of those Jews deemed by the German rabbinate to be the most closely aligned with Judaism and the Zionist ideology and thus prime candidates for filling the quotas necessary for the Rothschild scheme of establishing the Jewish homeland in Palestine. From that point well into the beginning years of the war the Zionist Jews and their organizations worked in tandem with the German government in order to move as many Zionist Jews out of Germany as possible. If that peaceful migration of Jews was halted it certainly wasn’t the fault of the National Socialist government of Germany but more to do with the British government of the day that halted the said immigration in 1939 when it declared war on Germany.
It also must be clearly pointed out that those Jews who were deemed suitable for immigration to Palestine (chosen by the Jews themselves and not the Hitler government) were allowed to leave the country with their possessions and their wealth contrary to the simplistic assertions contained in Selick’s reckless and specious attempt to connect the government of Adolf Hitler with the machinations of what are in fact the Zionist influenced actions of the Harper government and its Zionist supporting cast comprised of the Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs and the Zionist hate rag the National Post and likely others such as B’nai Brith Canada, all the real bone fide censors existing in Canada today operating clandestinely as 5th columnist traitorous Jewish lobby groups and now, as shown in Selick’s article, involved in further attempts to stop the National Alliance from receiving its legally bequeathed gift from a Canadian supporter.
YoungHitlerAdmirer 700
Selick’s attempt to equate Adolf Hitler and the German nation with all the present subterfuge emanating from the Zionist Jews here in Canada is a cogent example of how the Zionist Jew mindset operates. They distort everything out of proportion; turn the facts 180 degrees upside down in order to force events to match their long list of lies that must be publicized on a regular basis so as to prevent the stupid goy from realizing what is really going on behind the scenes. It’s the Zionist way and Selick is living proof of just how clandestine and contorted and dangerous the Zionist ideology is when it comes to discerning truth from the fiction of lies that political Zionism is predicated upon.
If I might paraphrase the precise words of Selick, who, in her maligning slurs and aspersions aimed at the National Alliance, had the gall to state, ‘As a Jew, I have no sympathy whatsoever with the National Alliance. They sound vile and loathsome to me’ I would unhesitatingly state that as a Gentile Christian I have absolutely no sympathy whatsoever with the Zionist Jews. They not only sound vile and loathsome to me but their actions over the past century and longer have convinced me that they ARE vile and loathsome and that they pose the greatest danger to world peace and harmony that this world has ever experienced.

The beatings and abuse and injustice never stops.
Helen Michell (shown in the photo above) and also known by her native name Telquaa, and her husband Frank Martin, both B.C. native-born residents, have been the victims of ongoing police brutality, stalking, harassment, racial profiling and hateful prejudice for the past twenty-five years and longer and the abuse continues to this day despite endless attempts at peaceful pleading to all levels of government ranging from the provincial to the federal to International agencies such as the United Nations to have the injustices committed against them halted.
The fact that this tortuous, incessant assault upon two now elderly First Nations people and their family, whose only ‘crime’ over the past decades has been their peaceful and ceaseless support for and advocacy to protect their unceded territories, the natural environment and their way of life as reflected in the wisdom and ways of their traditional hereditary ancestors, begs the question as to the type of justice system being reflected here in British Columbia by these heinous acts of deliberate terrorist against two innocent indigenous people.
What dire threat do these two sovereign-minded individuals pose to the province of B.C. that they have been profiled by the RCMP to the extent they have then subjected to endless attacks based upon either petty vehicle infractions or simply the fact that these victims of police abuse dared to venture out on our public highways?
What’s more astounding yet is the fact that due to all the repeated attacks over the years that have included deliberate acts of forcefully running their vehicle off the road and causing a near fatal accident that left Helen Michell a paraplegic and blind in one eye, these cruel, vindictive ‘peace officers’ who hide their vicious actions behind a mask of police badge and uniform authoritarian legitimacy, are now dragging this same helpless, crippled woman out of her van and beating her, breaking her finger and bruising her body out on the public highway in broad daylight and in view of her children and then, if only to add insult to their despicable injuries, they turn around and deliberately twist the whole affair out of context like some cheap Mossad maneuver and lay charges of criminal assault against Helen, the very victim who they’ve intentionally and wrongfully battered and beaten for the supposed ‘crime’ of not having a goddam signal light that worked properly; an accusation that both Helen and Frank adamantly deny!
AGBond
There’s something is extremely vile and wicked with is whole scenario and it’s beyond time that B.C.’s Attorney General and Minister of Justice Shirley Bond stepped in and put a stop to this endless legacy of lunatic behaviour by these belligerent, para-military mercenaries of the state otherwise know as the RCMP before one of these asinine, psychos eventually loses total control and pumps either or both of these innocent people full of lead; a scenario that is becoming more and more prevalent during these times. An investigation is overdue into who the people are responsible for stalking and threatening and terrorizing these people and that investigation should be commenced by the AG’s office and not any RCMP organizations like the RCMP Complaints Commission.
Frank&Telquaa
The Radical Press has been following the story of Frank and Helen and documenting their ongoing plight with the provincial authorities and their decades long efforts to get their territory located at Maxan Lake in the Burns Lake region of the province returned to them; land that that was stolen from under them back in the 1990’s by the actions of crooked government-elected chiefs and band counsels. In an Interview first published in the now defunct monthly tabloid called The Radical, back in June of 2001 readers can get a good glimpse of the possible reasons why these two indigenous sovereingtists have been subjected to this ongoing abuse for so long. I highly recommend that viewers look at it.
The list of repeated abuses, beatings and harassment is phenomenal and stands as a stark reminder of just how brazen and ugly the so-called justice system truly is here in B.C. if you’re not a member of the dominant, privileged society or a person of wealth and influence. The following story published by RadicalPress.com back on February 27th, 2011 is a vivid account of the life that Frank and Helen are living in Lotus Land, also touted as the most beautiful place on earth to live. It’s not a pretty tale at all. Frank Martin has been subjected to police violence again and again all for the simple crime of standing up for his rights as a free and independent thinker and a man who refuses to buckle under to the oppressively constant pressure to not question the criminal activities of his own ‘red apple’ brothers or those who’ve created the current system of native governance across Turtle Island.
FrankMartinPic
Almost daily in the controlled media we hear of horror stories of abuse after abuse by estranged RCMP officers who now behave more like the old bolshevik Cheka secret police did in the Soviet Union rather than decent, honest, sensitive protectors of the public. It’s these types of aberrant behaviour on the part of the cops that makes it so plainly obvious to Frank and Helen that the safety of their lives and their family members is becoming more and more precarious as time goes by and sooner or later one of these maniacs with the yellow striped pants will blow yet another fuse and end up murdering either them or their children.
This story is being sent to the mainstream media here in B.C. and elsewhere plus it is going directly to the Attorney General’s office and to Shirley Bond. Will she actually do something about these crimes against Frank and Helen and put an end to legacy of injustice? Let’s find out.

Dear Free Speech Advocates and Radical Press Supporters,
On Tuesday, July 9th, 2013 I once again donned my suit and tie and along with my dedicated wife drove into the small city of Quesnel in order to attend court on the matter of the Sec. 319(2) CCC charge and arrest for the purported crime of ‘willfully promoting hatred against ‘people of the Jewish religion or ethnic group’ originally brought on by B’nai Brith Canada’s Agent Z and serial Section 13 complainant Agent Y.
At my last appearance on May 28th, 2013 I had expected to find out whether or not the Crown’s new strategy of going for a ‘direct indictment’ instead of allowing me to have the customary preliminary hearing in order to determine whether they had a strong enough case to move forward to a trial by judge and jury it turned out that the B.C. Attorney General’s office had still not made up its mind. As a result Judge Morgan was forced to extend the time period further and set a new date of July 9, 2013, one which Crown Counsel Jennifer Johnston felt would give the AG’s office more than sufficient time to determine whether to go ahead with Crown’s proposed unusual move.
It was a welcome relief for my wife and myself to finally get a month and a half off from the seemingly endless and onerous legal harassment that’s been going on since May of 2012. Unless someone has been forced to run through this gauntlet of appearance upon appearance combined with never-ending and surprising changes whenever they do appear it’s hard to imagine the stress and strain that it puts upon a person or a relationship in the case of a married couple. Now we basically could get on with our lives for a few weeks at least and enjoy a little peace and quiet while the Crown was making up its mind as to what direction the proceedings would take.
June passed without any word on the direct indictment and July also brought forth nothing in the way of new disclosure on this matter. Finally on Monday, July 8, 2013, the day prior to my appearance I received an email letter from CC Johnston containing a one line statement, ‘The Crown will not be filing a direct indictment on file 25166-5.’
Knowing that the Attorney General’s office would not be going for a direct indictment was good news and meant that at least now there was a still a glimmer of hope that I might be able to proceed with my Rowbotham application (to get a government funded legal counsel to defend me) and hold a preliminary inquiry to determine the merits of the aforementioned Sec. 319(2) charge.
The time for the appearance was 1:30 p.m. and we were there, as usual, a few minutes in advance. When I checked the docket on the wall outside the lower court room where the proceedings have been taking place I noticed that my name wasn’t on the list! What’s going on now was my first thought. I double checked just to make sure I hadn’t missed it and then decided to go upstairs to the court registry office to find out what was going on when one of the court clerks came by and said that there wasn’t going to be a court appearance for me today and that I should go up to the next floor and see the trial coordinator.
This has been the manner in which the Crown has acted since the beginning of my case. Knowing that I don’t have a lawyer to represent me Crown Counsel Jennifer Johnston, when she sent me her email the day before, could easily have informed me at the same time that I wouldn’t have to appear in court and instead ought to see the trial coordinator to set up dates for my Rowbotham application and for the preliminary hearing. But, out of either oversight or spite (and given all of her previous aggressiveness and calculated efforts to have me perceived in the same light as a child pornographer I would venture to say that it’s the latter) she failed to notify of this simple procedure.
So I and my dear wife went into the trial coordinator’s office and discussed the three immediate concerns related to my case. The coordinator was obviously becoming impatient with all the delays over the past months and was determined to set some dates. The first thing on her agenda was to call, via telephone, Keith Evans who is legal counsel for the B.C. Attorney General’s office in order to discuss my Rowbotham application which he is overseeing. There was some banter back and forth between the two parties in order to clarify exactly what was going on. I had submitted my Notice of Application and Affidavit to the AG back on April 23, 2013 and received a package of material back from Mr. Evans on May 11th explaining all the additional information that I was expected to furnish him with prior to a hearing taking place on the matter.
Then, when Crown suddenly decided to go for a direct indictment things changed and I had to wait for verification on that matter prior to completing the Rowbotham application because of the fact that if a direct indictment was going to be the method of proceeding then I would have to make the Rowbotham application out for a lawyer who would represent at the trial stage. If a direct indictment wasn’t going to be method used then I would have to make the application out to get a lawyer to represent me at the preliminary hearing.
Now that we knew what direction the Crown was heading in AG counsel Evans told the trial coordinator that he needed the additional information from me regarding my financial status before proceeding with the Rowbotham application and that then the Crown could set a date for a hearing on the application. The trial coordinator set August 13th, 2013 as the time in which I should have completed the required additional information and furnished AG Evans with it. When I returned to her office on that date we would then fix a date for a hearing on the matter. I would be expected to appear at this determined time and defend myself without counsel as I attempted to justify why I felt I could not afford to hire a lawyer and why I also felt that the case was much too important and complex for me to deal with it on my own. The outcome of this hearing will decide whether or not I will qualify for a government appointed lawyer to assist me in my defense. If I am refused it means having to go it alone without counsel and that could drastically change the nature of the case in undetermined ways.
One further point regarding the Rowbotham application and the preliminary hearing needs to be highlighted here. From the outset of this ‘hate crime’ show trial venture by the Crown there’s been a concerted effort to downplay the preliminary hearing stage of events. Why this is occurring I’m not exactly sure but it’s been happening over and over again to the point where I feel it needs to be discussed. The primary purpose of a preliminary hearing is to determine whether or not the Crown has sufficient evidence to proceed to trial. Crown has also been stating that there is a very low threshold which it needs to meet in order for the case to proceed but I believe there are some critical issues which they are overlooking. In my case where the Crown itself (through the actions of the RCMP) broke the law right from the start by issuing an illegal search warrant to Det. Cst. Terry Wilson that then allowed his ‘Hate Crime Team’ to enter my home and steal all of computers, email files and subsequently all of my firearms was a fundamental breach of the Criminal Code of Canada which states under Section 183 that a Sec. 319(2) ‘offense’ does NOT allow for search and seizure of an accused premises and the removal or interception of any private communications or electronic files. My former counsel Doug Christie had allotted 5 days of time in order to deal with this and other matters during the preliminary hearing but in fixing a date the trial co-ordinator booked for only 5 hours on the January 22nd. I will be checking into this further as well as addressing it with counsel should my Rowbotham application prove successful.
Having dealt with that issue the trial coordinator then brought up the matter of my previous application to the court regarding particularization of disclosure. Readers who have been following these updates will know that I applied earlier on for particularization of the evidence so that I could get an idea of what it was that the Crown was planning to use during the trial to determine that I ought to be found guilty of this ‘hate’ crime. All I now have is well over a thousand pages of documents filled with all sorts of articles, online books, etc. that the Crown (via Det. Cst. Terry Wilson of the BC Hate Crime Unit) has been downloading from RadicalPress.com in what it purports to be an ‘ongoing investigation’ to back up their claim that I am guilty of committing said Sec. 319(2) ‘crime’. In order for me to defend myself against these charges I need to know what posts on the website are being used but when the application first came up before Judge Wilson on May 28th, 2013 Crown Counsel Johnston attempted, with a rhetorical flourish of her hand, to simply dismiss the application outright stating that there was no legal precedent or case law that required the Crown to furnish me with any particularization whatsoever. Given that my application was one which had been prepared by my former counsel Douglas Christie and was replete with case law backing it up, all the sound and fury emanating from CC Johnston appeared to signify nothing beyond theatrical antics rather than anything legal and so Judge Morgan determined not to delve further into it. The trial coordinator asked me if I would like to address the matter when I returned to court on August 13th and I said that would be fine.
The final date to fix was one for the preliminary hearing and already, because of the many delays and circumlocutions instigated by the Crown, this meant that it wouldn’t be taking place until next year. After checking her schedule the trial coordinator chose the date of January 22nd, 2014 for the preliminary hearing with an estimate time of 5 hours allotted. She also set a date of January 7, 2014 for a trial confirmation hearing. All of these proposed dates could possibly change if the Rowbotham application is approved and my new counsel has any concerns over anything.
For Justice and Freedom of Speech for Everyone Everywhere,
Arthur Topham
Publisher & Editor
The Radical Press
?‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998?
P.S. As a final parting note I would once again please ask readers to consider helping me out financially with a donation if they can. Please go to the top of the Home Page at www.radicalpress.com and click on the ‘PLEASE DONATE TO THE RADICAL PRESS FREE SPEECH DEFENSE FUND’ link where you will find all the information necessary to send financial help. Thank you.

[Editor’s Note: When Section 13 was repealed by the federal government on June 26th, 2013 there was great rejoicing among Canadians who have been witnessing the tragic events that have unfolded over the past few decades due to the draconian nature of this unjust piece of legislation tucked away in the Canadian Human Rights Act. I was one of those who was glad to see it finally repealed but as Marc Lemire explains in his article below it’s not as if a general amnesty had suddenly been declared for those who were already under the gun and had been accused under this specious legislation prior to the June 26th repeal.
Like Marc and others I too was being forced to participate in that charade right up until the time that Marc’s case was heard by the Canadian Human Right’s Tribunal and the Tribunal declared it to be unconstitutional. It was then that my case and others like mine were all stayed when the Canadian Human Rights Commission appealed the Tribunal’s decision and forced Marc to then have to then contest their appeal in the federal court.
In other words all the cases that were not yet completed when the Tribunal ruled on Marc Lemire’s are still waiting in line and if Marc doesn’t win in this final battle with the Canadian Human Rights Commission then the rest of us will be rammed through the now defunct process regardless of whether or not it no longer exists in real time. What it really goes to show is that human rights organizations like the Canadian Human Rights Commission exist in separate realities and twilight zones where what is considered normal and common sense don’t hold any sway.
Given these circumstances and the fact that those writers, publishers, bloggers and concerned individuals who weren’t affected by Section 13 when it was still actively in force are now free to speak out more forcefully about this issue it’s now their responsibility to pick up the slack and start defending those of us who are still awaiting a fate that none are guilty of nor responsible for having created in any way.
The first thing for everyone is to spread the word about the importance of Marc’s case now pending and to assist in any way possible to make sure that he doesn’t lose his appeal.]
——-
http://blog.freedomsite.org/2013/07/section-13-repeal-what-does-it-mean-for.html
http://canadianhumanrightscommission.blogspot.ca/2013/07/section-13-repeal-what-does-it-mean-for.html
Last week, the Senate of Canada passed Bill C-304, which repealed Section 13 and 54 of the Canadian Human Rights Act. Section 13 was Canada’s shameful censorship legislation, which made it an offence to ‘likely’ ‘expose’ privileged groups to ‘hatred and/or contempt.’ There are NO defences under Section 13! Even truth and intent are considered irrelevant to a finding of discrimination. The law was enacted in 1977 and in the intervening years, not a single person who has been hauled up on Section 13 charges has ever been acquitted a 100% conviction rate. Section 13 has been used and abused since its inception.
Bill C-304 has a one year implementation period written into it, so in effect, Section 13 will technically be gone in June, 2014. It is unlikely that the Canadian Human Rights Commission will accept and approve any new Section 13 complaints at this point, but who knows, it’s really hard to know what fanatics will do. The CHRC’s main stumbling block is the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal which ruled in the Lemire case, that Section 13 was unconstitutional, and has since stopped all Section 13 cases ‘Sine Die’. It’s pretty clear the Tribunal does not want to be a willing participant in the Human Rights Commission’s fanatical restriction of freedom of speech, or have any part in the CHRC’s spying and harassing of Canadians. As odd as this may sound, in the judicial system, it was actually the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal which sounded the alarm over Section 13 and the CHRC’s apparatchiks’ handling of cases, and their steadfast refusal to mediate any complaints (which flies in the face of any remedial piece of legislation). Section 13 was never meant to punish and persecute people, but the fanatics at the CHRC just couldn’t resist grinding poor and defenseless people into the ground with protracted and expensive litigation.
So what happens now?
At it currently stands, there will most likely never be another new Section 13 case in Canada, but for those currently in the system; it’s a totally different story.
Bloggers can now rest easy; that the ‘Nazi fetishists’ of the CHRC will not be logging into their websites, dressing up as Nazis and spying on them. Message Board owners can breathe a little bit freer now and not have to worry about busy body ‘hate finder General’s’ looking to cash in on the latest ‘witch’. The chill that Section 13 placed over all internet communications is now gone.
But for those of us who are caught up in the Section 13 ‘torture rack’, it might still be a while until we can throw off the yoke of censorship. The process is still the punishment, and the CHRC is going to take out their anger and revenge on us. As of today, all other Section 13 cases have been stopped pending a decision in my case. But with being the last standing Section 13 victim, the CHRC is going to open up both barrels on me!
Canadian law is quite a confusing thing. There is a big difference between a repeal of a law, and the court finding a law ‘unconstitutional’. Of course my entire 10 year legal ordeal against the CHRC has been for the latter. To find Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act an unconstitutional abridgement of the Charter of Rights, and of my freedom of expression. I spent some 6+ years fighting for my freedom before the CHRC and the Human Rights Tribunal. On September 2, 2009, the Tribunal acquitted me of the hundreds of ‘hate speech’ charges leveled against me, and also found that Section 13 was unconstitutional. This ruling was appealed by the CHRC to the Federal Court, which partly sided with the CHRC. The court ruled with me, that the fine provisions were unconstitutional (Section 54), but that Section 13 was just fine. That ruling is currently under appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals, with the Canadian Civil Liberties Association and others supporting my position.
Just to give a better explanation between a repeal of a law, and the finding that a law is unconstitutional. (Keep in mind, I am not a lawyer) My impression is that the Parliament can repeal any law. That does not mean that the law was an unjustifiable infringement on any Canadians. But rather, when a law is found to be unconstitutional, it is the court saying that this law was wrong from the start, and is an unjustifiable infringement. The main difference is, when a law is repealed, no future cases can be brought. But if a law is found unconstitutional, then no cases should have EVER been brought. It may open up an option for individuals to sue the government for wrong doing, as well it demonstrates that no person should have even been convicted under the law. In effect, the law is flawed, and the court is correcting this flaw by striking down the law.
Those are big differences, and especially important for those who are currently before the CHRC’s Section 13 Thought Inquisition. When a law is repealed, it applies going forward. But Canadian law is so screwy that anyone who was previously charged, they have to fight under the previously enforced rules. So basically, the law was ‘constitutional and in force’ when the complaint was filed against me in 2003, so that’s the version of the law I am fighting. Move over ‘Alice in Wonderland’ there is a whole new world where the rabbit hole never ends.
So in other words, I am now fighting at the Federal Court of Appeals, on the constitutionality of Section 13, which has now been repealed. WTF! How much crazier can it get? But it’s no laughing matter. I am fighting against a lifetime speech ban, which if I ever violated, could result in me going to jail for up to 5 years. (Several others in the past have been sentenced to up to 1 year in jail for violating a lifetime speech ban, so this is no joke)
The heart of my appeal to the Federal Court of Appeals is that Section 13 is unconstitutional on dozens of grounds. That it is an unjustified limitation to the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and not saved by Section 1 of the Charter. That’s really the crux of the case Section 1 of the Charter. And as part of a review of my Section 1 arguments, the Court has to look at the will and wishes of the Parliament of Canada (pressing and substantial need). And this is where the repeal of Section 13 is going to immensely help me. How can anyone say that Section 13 is a minimal impairment to freedom and ‘pressing and substantial’ in Canada, when the Parliament of Canada has spoken so clearly and repealed Section 13.
My case is the last hurrah for the CHRC censors. There won’t be any new cases, so if they want to leave with a bang (and fanatics always seem to!) they are going to pull out all stops to beat me at the Federal Court of Appeals. In their eyes, if Section 13 has not have been found unconstitutional they can blame those evil ‘Conservatives’ for repealing the law (once again refusing to accept any responsibility for the issues surrounding Section 13) The CHRC has already spent hundreds of thousands of tax-payers money to fight against me over the past 10 years. I would not be surprised in the number was actually in the millions. The CHRC are using a high priced lawyer (actually lawyers) from one of downtown Toronto’s expensive law firms. In order to try to manipulate public opinion, the CHRC spent hundreds of thousands with the astronomical priced Hill and Knowlton public relations firm, to do damage control on the Section 13 file. Gee, that was money well spent! After all, it seems like the censors just see the gullible tax-paying sheeple as an endless pit of CA$H, which they can use to harass and silence those ‘ignorant’ Canadians who just don’t get with their ‘program’. (Pogrom?)
‘Why Marc Lemire Must Challenge Constitutionality of a Law That May Be Repealed’
Please have a look at my video on ‘Why Marc Lemire Must Challenge Constitutionality of a Law That May Be Repealed’
image002
YouTube: http://youtu.be/PVNaZzj6wD4
1. If Marc Lemire simply accepts the Federal Court ruling of Justice Richard Mosley then Lemire faces a lifetime Free Speech Ban for the ‘crime’ of posting a document that contains the very same information and statistics the Canadian Blood Services used to ban homosexual men from giving blood.
2. Even if Section 13 is repealed by the Senate it makes no difference to Marc Lemire’s case, nor to the cases of hundreds of other Canadians already charged and convicted under this oppressive law. As absurd as it sounds, Marc Lemire could face a lifetime ban on his Right to Freedom of Speech under a law that no longer exists.Should he refuse to abide by the lifetime Free Speech ban he could go to prison.
The maximum penalty for contempt of a Tribunal decision is 5 years in prison. The maximum penalty for a conviction of criminal ‘hate speech’ under Section 319 of the Criminal Code: Two years.
In the entire history of the Canadian Human Rights Commission not a single person has ever been sent to prison for violating an Canadian Human Rights Tribunal ruling…
Except for those convicted of ‘thought crimes’ under Section 13…
If Marc Lemire wants to retain his Right to Freedom of Speech and let me assure you, he does, then he has no choice but to challenge both the Constitutionality of Section 13 as well as appeal Justice Mosley’s horribly flawed and biased Federal Court decision.
3. It is critical for Freedom of Speech that Section 13 be denounced as an affront to our Charter Right to Freedom of Speech and that the Federal Court of Appeals strikes it down as unconstitutional. Why? It will mean the hundreds of cases prosecuted under this law over the past 33 years were unconstitutional prosecutions. More importantly, it will mean the penalties imposed by those unconstitutional convictions are also unconstitutional.
4. If Section 13 is declared unconstitutional, as any unbiased judge must clearly see, then those people suffering under lifetime Freedom of Speech bans could appeal to the court to have those bans removed. If the law is simply repealed (removed from the books) then there is no avenue in Canadian law for those individuals to regain their Right to Freedom of Speech.
5. There are multiple cases currently ‘on hold’ because of Marc Lemire’s case, his Constitutional Challenge of Section 13 and his Federal Court Appeal of Justice Mosley’s decision.
These cases are at both the Tribunal and Federal Court level.
All of the cases currently ‘on hold’ will move forward the second there is a final decision in Lemire’s case.
6. The Canadian Human Rights Tribunal, the body that said itself that Section 13 was unconstitutional, stopped all Section 13 cases pending the outcome of Marc Lemire’s case.
‘… I have also concluded that Section 13(1) in conjunction with Sections 54(1) and (1.1) are inconsistent with Section 2(b) of the Charter [of Rights and Freedoms], which guarantees the freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression. The restriction imposed by these provisions is not a reasonable limit within the meaning of Section 1 of the Charter.’
— Athanasios D. Hadjis’ Decision in Warmouse v. Lemire
7. Repeal of the law does not address all corruption and the inappropriate administration of Section 13. We need a court to examine the spying, lying and conniving of the CHRC and rule that they were out of control in both Marc Lemire’s case and in many other cases.
The stated aims of the Canadian Human Rights Act are remedial, not punitive. The object of the Act is to ‘correct discriminatory behaviour’ not punish.
Is it ‘remedial’ to refuse any and all attempts at mediation? Is it ‘remedial’ to refuse any and all attempts at mediation?
Is it ‘remedial’ to refuse to communicate with the subject of a Human Rights Act complaint?
Is it ‘remedial’ to continue prosecuting a man 8 years after all ‘offending’ documents were removed from the Internet?
No, it is not.
If you despise government bodies telling you what you can and cannot say on the Internet…
If you despise law written for telephone answering machines being applied to all of your internet communications on any internet platform…
If you believe Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act violates your Constitutional Right to Freedom of Speech…
Then please contribute generously to Marc Lemire’s Free Speech Legal Defense Fund so he can continue his appeal and Constitutional Challenge of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Now that Section 13 has been repealed by Parliament, the CHRC is going to go after me with both guns blazing. Can I count on you to support the cause of freedom? My courageous lawyer Barbara Kulaszka and I have demonstrated what two dedicated freedom fighters can accomplish against overwhelming odds. We have single-handedly and doggedly fought the system and exposed the corrupt underbelly of the ‘Human Rights’ Commission’s racket. I cannot carry on this important fight alone. Your donations literally equal the survival of this case.
Please support Marc Lemire’s Constitutional Challenge of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act.
Marc Lemire is the only person to beat the CHRC in it’s 33 year history!
http://www.stopsection13.com/support.html
(Interac Money Transfers, Donate Online, and online store)
Donate via PayPal by clicking here: [here]
————
Marc Lemire
762 Upper James St
Suite 384
Hamilton, Ontario
L9C 3A2
Email: [email protected]
Web: http://www.freedomsite.org | http://www.StopSection13.com
Twitter: @marc_lemire