RadicalPress.com | AAA+ Replica Watches | Designer Replica Rolex Diamond Watches 2023

THIS SERIES IS DEDICATED TO CANADIAN PM STEPHEN HARPER IN THE HOPE THAT HE WILL SEE THE LIGHT WITH REGARD TO B’NAI BRITH CANADA.
___________________________________________________________________________
ADL/HateCrimesLeg
ADL DEFENSE ARM OF B’NAI BRITH
——————-
THE AUTHOR
William Cooper
MILTON WILLIAM COOPER
May 6, 1943 November 5, 2001
[Editor’s Note: William Cooper was murdered by police on November 5th, 2001 at the age of 58. He was an American writer, shortwave broadcaster who came into public awareness in the late 1980s. William was also a radio host, author and political activist known for his best-selling underground book titled Behold A Pale Horse and his worldwide shortwave radio show Hour of the Time. Cooper was also known for his court battle with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and the recorded attempts to dissuade him from pursuing his case.
William Cooper founded Harvest Trust, the CAJI News Service, Veritas newspaper, The Intelligence Service, and Harvest Publications. Under his leadership Harvest Trust ventured into publishing. The first book under the Harvest Trust imprint was Oklahoma City: Day One (ISBN 0-9653307-1-0), by Michele Marie Moore about the Oklahoma City bombing.
An advocate for free radio, Cooper operated the unlicensed Independence Foundation Trust at 101.1 FM in Eagar, Arizona. Cooper claimed to have helped over 700 low power FM affiliate stations get equipped and on the air.
My belief is that Cooper was murdered by the Illuminati because of his work to expose the Beast to the public. This series of talks on B’nai Brith and the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) was part of his work to enlighten the public on who’s who behind the veil. Right at the beginning of this series he makes a comment about just such a scenario arising for many who did what he did. God willing he’ll be the last one to die for such efforts. Bless his soul.
The title of the series on RadicalPress.com is mine. Seeing as the ADL is but an offshoot of B’nai Brith and many people here in Canada think of this organization as B’nai Brith I’ve decided to use it in the title.]
Anti-Defamation League #1
THE HOUR OF THE TIME
Tape No. 524:‘ADL No. 1’
Wednesday, January 11, 1995
This broadcast was taken in whole or in part from investigations conducted by the CAJI News Service, and the Intelligence Service, and from reports published by The Executive Intelligence Review entitled ‘The Ugly Truth About The ADL’, and ‘Dope Inc.’.
Folks, tonight I’m going to embark on a course from which there is no return.It is important that you learn the information that I’m going to begin to impart to you tonight; and yes, it is a part of the ‘Mind Control’ series.It is also a part of the history of the Illuminati in this nation.And it will explain an awful lot of things to you that have never been explainable before.It’s going to explain to you the link between the Lodges of the Illuminati, the intelligence community, and the underworld.
It is extremely dangerous what I am embarking upon, simply because so many people who have attempted to reveal this history previously have been killed in the process of doing it.I have no fear, and I will finish what I start, or someone will, because it needs to be done.
Tonight, I begin to narrate to you a special report of the ‘Executive Intelligence Review’ entitled ‘The Ugly Truth About the ADL’.
Now, I want you to understand something.I am not talking about Jews. I am talking about a branch of the Illuminati:the control structure that is bringing one-world government into fruition, destroying the sovereignty of nations, and many, many other things.
As you will see, ladies and gentlemen, the ADL does not represent the Jewish people; but instead, is using them, and is manipulating them so that they, innocentlyas many of you have done throughout your life innocentlyare helping to bring about the destruction of the sovereignty of individual nations, the destruction of individual, Creator-endowed, Constitutionally- guaranteed rights, and the formation of a one-world, totalitarian, socialist government.
I want it clearly understood that ‘The Hour of the Time’ has stated on many, many occasions that we oppose racism of any kind, in any form, by anyone.
What you’re going to discover is that the ADL, while calling many, many people anti-semitic, are themselves one of the most racist groups that has ever existed upon the face of this earth.

Ladies and gentlemen, the original research was done by the ‘Executive Intelligence Review’.CAJI has duplicated the research down to the T to make sure that this material is true.And it is absolutely, 100% legitimate and historical truth from beginning to end.And that’s why the ADL and B’nai B’rith has never sued the ‘Executive Intelligence Review’ over this report.
April 14, 1865, the day Abraham Lincoln was shot, will live forever, ladies and gentlemen, as a day of infamy for American patriots, and lovers of freedom all over the world.
But for the leadership of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, and the Order of B’nai B’rith, and it’s twentieth-century police arm, the Anti-Defamation League, April 14th, 1865 is a day that will be long remembered for a very different reason.
The B’nai B’rith, a pivotal player in the British Freemasonic plot to destroy the Union, was implicated in Lincoln’s assassinationsomething that you’ve never been taught.
That fact does not square very well with its long-cultivatedbut totally unwarrantedreputation as a Jewish social service organization, and a champion of civil rights.For that reason, B’nai B’rith and the ADL have gone to great lengths, ladies and gentlemen, to bury that history and much, much more.
Simon Wolf , 1835-1923, was the Washington, D.C. lawyer for the Order of B’nai B’rith during the entire period of the United States Civil War.He would later head the International Order of B’nai B’rith for many years.
In 1862, Wolf was arrested by Lafayette C. Bakerthe Chief of Detectives for the City of Washington, D.C., and later, Lincoln’s Chief of the United States Secret Serviceon charges that Wolf was involved in spying and blockade running on behalf of the Confederacy.
Baker arrested Wolf, who was the attorney representing a number of Jews accused of spying for the South, on the grounds that he was part of a conspiratorial organization working on behalf of the secessionist cause behind the lines in the nation’s capitol.The conspiratorial organization named by Baker was the B’nai B’rith.
Both Baker and United States General Ulysses S. Grant targeted the Order of B’nai B’rith as a Confederate spy agency.Upon taking command of the western front in 1862, General Grant issued Order No. 11 which expelled all Jews from the military district within 24 hours of its implementation.
U.S. Grant was no anti-semite, ladies and gentlemen.He was reacting to the activities of B’nai B’rith and leading Confederates like Judah P. Benjamin.
Lincoln, however, cognizant of the need to avoid blanket attacks against religious or ethnic groups, rescinded the orderwhich was the proper thing to dofor all Jews are not members of B’nai B’rith; and B’nai B’rith was not solely at guilt.
The Civil War was actually engineered and brought about by British intelligence through their arm of the Illuminati in the United States headed by Albert Pike:the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, whose headquarters at that time was in Charleston, South Carolina.
A 1987 B’nai B’rith-authorized biography of Simon Wolf by Esther L. Panitz offered the following highly suggestivealbeit incompletedescription of Wolf’s personal relationship with President Lincoln’s assassin, John Wilkes Booth.
Now, bear in mind, folks, that this biography, written on the basis of B’nai B’rith’s archiveswritten on the basis of B’nai B’rith’s own archivespaints Wolf in the most favorable of lights.
The mere fact that the author had to include Wolf’s links to Booth and Wolf’s earlier arrest as an alleged Confederate spy and blockade-runner implies that the actual story is far uglier.I quote from the history of the B’nai B’rith:
‘Wolf’s concern for culture first expressed itself in the formation of a private club devoted to the arts and humanities, and frequented by young men avid for learning.
‘Were pride and ambition his only motives in seeking the intellectual life?
‘Clearly, Wolf hoped that if he and his friends would devote themselves to the pursuit of learning, they would deflect the prejudicial statements of their Christian neighbors.
‘Wolf was upset that terms such as ‘money-changers’, ‘cotton-traders’, and ‘clothes-dealers’ had become words of reproach.
‘Locally, the groups theatrical productions received a good press. Wolf, who would often play the Ghost in ‘Hamlet’ or Shylock in ‘The Merchant of Venice’, bore an uncanny resemblance to John Wilkes Booth, Lincoln’s assassin. Earlier in Cleveland, Booth had joined Wolf and Peixoto in dramatic performances.
‘Years afterward, Wolf remembered that he had met Booth once again at the Willard Hotel on the morning of the day Lincoln was shot.
‘There at the bar, Booth explained that Senator John P. Hale’s daughter had just rejected his marriage proposal.Wolf attributed Lincoln’s murder to this personal tragedy in Booth’s own life.Wolf also recalled that once he sat for a picture entitled ‘The Assassination of President Lincoln’.’
End quote.In his own book, ladies and gentlemen, entitled ‘Presidents I Have Known’, Wolf says that he and his long-time acquaintance, John Wilkes Booth, did some drinking together at the Willard Hotel on the day Booth shot Lincoln.
Wolf’s, and a second leading B’nai B’rith figure, Benjamin Peixoto’s dealings with John Wilkes Booth, were hardly cultural.Nor could Wolf have possibly believed that Abraham Lincoln was killed because of John Wilkes Booth’s unrequited love affair.
Even John Hinkley, the would-be assassin of President Ronald Reagan, was declared insane when he tried to peddle the line that he had tried to kill Ronald Reagan due to an unfulfilled fantasy love affair with actress Jodie Foster.
To understand the circumstances under which B’nai B’rith’s Washington, D.C. leader and one of its founding members were circumstantially tied to the Lincoln assassination conspiracy, and explicitly linked to the secessionist insurrection against the Union, it is necessary to look briefly at the circumstances under which the Order of B’nai B’rith was founded in 1843.
Following the American Revolution, the British monarchy and its East India Company colonists’ apparatus never for a moment abandoned their commitment to reconquer the lost colonies in North America.
Although the military effort at reconquest in the War of 1812 failed, other efforts to seed the United States with British agents, some drawn from the ranks of anti-Republican Torieswho were permitted to retain their citizenship and property in America under the terms of the Treaty of Paris of 1783were more successful.
In 1801, the Tory faction of United States Freemasonrythe grouping of Freemasons who had sided with England during the American Revolutionopened up shop as the Grand Council of the Princes of Jerusalem of the Mother Supreme Council of the Knights Commander of the House of the Temple of Solomon of the Thirty-Third Degree of the Ancient and Accepted Order of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry in the United States.
This United States-based British Freemasonic Lodge was chartered in Charleston, South Carolina.The members of this British-led secret society would direct the Confederate secessionist insurrection a half-century later; and other Scottish Rite members would be among the founders of the B’nai B’rith. They, too, would be leading Confederates.
Apart from the esoteric mission of spreading an explicitly anti-Christian form of Roman pagan worship and occultism among the early generations of American citizens, the Charleston Lodge also sought to build up a network of pro-British merchants, spies, and politicians in both the North and the South who would one day play a pivotal role in the reconquest.
Many of these early Masons became wealthy through their business dealings with the British East India Company and the Dutch West India Company in both the cotton and the slave trade.
Among the founding members of the Charleston Scottish Rite Lodge were many prominent Jews, including Isaac Dacosta , Moses Cohen , Israel Deleiben , Dr. Isaac Held , Moses Levy and Moses Peixoto.
Many of these men, ladies and gentlemen, were Sephardic Jews from North Africa or from Spain who had originally settled in the Caribbean and engaged in the early slave trade.
These Jewish Masons set up their organizations which also maintained active liaison to Great Britain’s powerful Jewish community.
The Hebrew Orphan Aid Society was one such nominally benign group that would produce one of the most rabid secessionist leaders: Judah P. Benjamin.
Although today any reports of the Freemasonic roots and structure of B’nai B’rith are usually greeted with a torrent of allegations of anti-semitism, back in the formative years, B’nai B’rith’s own magazine, ‘The Menorah’, offered the following information about the founders of the groupand listen to this very carefully.Quote:
‘Their reunions were frequent and several of them being members of existing benevolent societies, especially the Order of Freemasons and Odd-Fellows, they finally concluded that a somewhat similar organization, but based upon the Jewish idea, would best obtain their object.
‘The Jewish religion has many observances and customs corresponding to the secret societies known to us.The synagogue, for instance, might be compared to a Lodge room.It used to be open twice a day.For a Jew desiring to find a friend, they had but to go there and make themselves known by a certain sign and token.
‘The sign consisted of a grip with a full hand and the magical word ‘Shalom Alakim’ .The mezuzah on the doorpost was the countersign‘Shema Israel’.‘Hear O Israel’ was the password.’
End quote.Indeed, to this day, all local chapters of the B’nai B’rith are referred to as Lodges, a practice borrowed whole cloth from the Scottish Rite.
When Moses saw some Jews of this B’nai B’rith-type who tried to make the religion into a pagan secret society, he took the calf which they had made, and burned it in the fire, and ground it into powder.And Moses returned unto the Lord and said:O, this people have sinned a great sin and made them gods of gold.
The majority of Jews in America during the first generations following Independence were opposed to the idea of a Jewish Freemasonic secret society.
Most Jews are ordinary people, like all of you listening, and don’t know any more about what’s happening in the world than you do.They are lied to, just like you are lied to.They are deceived, just like you are deceived. And they are easily manipulated, because throughout the history of the world, they have been chosen as the scapegoat, as the enemy.And because of that, they can be easily led by organizations such as B’nai B’rith and the Anti-Defamation League.
Israel Joseph Benjamin, a noted European Jew, in his memoirs, ‘Three Years in America:1859-62’, wrote of the B’nai B’rith that, quote:
‘This is a secret society like the Freemasons with passwords and the like, and was quite a new phenomenon for me. Still, I think the existence of such a society not at all necessary.’
End quote.He was right, ladies and gentlemen.The secret agenda of the B’nai B’rith, like that of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite, was to destroy the Union and pave the way for reconquest.
The ultimate goal:one-world, totalitarian, socialist government.
You see, B’nai B’rith is not the synagogue.B’nai B’rith is not Jews. B’nai B’rith is not Judaism.
B’nai B’rith is just another organ under a different name of the ages-old Illuminati, who practice the Ancient Mystery Religion of Babylon in secret.They call themselves the Great White Brotherhood, the Brotherhood of Man, the Illumined Ones.And if you’ve listened to our series on ‘Mystery Babylon’, you know the rest.
Two leading B’nai B’rith-allied figures would serve as exemplars of the strategy for permanently dividing the Union. One was Judah P. Benjamin, and the other August Belmont.
Benjamin, who lived from 1811 to 1884, was born in the British West Indies to Sephardic Jewish parents who moved to Charleston, South Carolina in 1827.
He was inducted into the Charleston Hebrew Orphan Aid Society, one of the precursors of the B’nai B’rith.
After attending Yale College in New Haven, Connecticut, he was forced to drop out under a cloud of scandal.
Benjamin surfaced in New Orleans where he quickly won the patronage of John SlidellSlidell, a United States Senator who would later play a pivotal role in the Confederacy and
sponsored the career of August Belmont who married Slidell’s daughter.
With Slidell’s assistance, Benjamin became a prominent attorney, even serving for a period of time as the United States Attorney for New Orleans.
Benjamin gained notoriety for covering up the growing terrorist activities of the Scottish-Rite-sponsored Knights of the Golden Circle while serving as the local federal prosecutor.
In 1852, Benjamin was elected United States Senator, a post he retained until the outbreak of the Civil War in 1861 when he resigned to serve the Confederacy.
Benjamin was the first Confederate Attorney General.He later served as Secretary of War and Secretary of State, ultimately running the Confederate Secret Service on behalf of Confederate President Jefferson Davis.
And as the Mossad does today, he used innocent Jews in the North who were opposed to the dissolution of the Union to furnish information to the intelligence arm of the Confederacy.
Judah Benjamin escaped to England following the defeat of the Confederate secessionist plot.
It was Benjamin’s Confederate Secret Service which organized and supervised such figures in the assassination of Abraham Lincoln as John Wilkes Booth and his accomplice John Serrat .
Benjamin was charged with sedition for the Lincoln assassination, although he was never brought to trial due to his protected status in England.
With the help of a leading Rothschild political asset in England, Baron Pollock , Benjamin continued his legal career in London.He never abandoned his commitment to subvert and destroy the American republic.However, as a wealthy lawyer for the British merchant oligarchs, Judah Benjamin collaborated with other exiled Confederate and Masonic strategists in England such as James D. Bullock and Robert Tombs .
Benjamin’s continuing preoccupation with defeating Reconstruction is indicated in letters he wrote back to the United States with complaints such as these, quote:
‘I have always looked with the utmost dread and distrust on the experiment of emancipation so suddenly enforced on the South by the event of the war.God knows how it will all end.’
End quote.And then he went on to say, quote:
‘The South is kept crushed under Negro rule.I can never consent to go to New Orleans and break my heart witnessing the rule of Negroes and Carpetbaggers.Nothing is so abhorrent to me as radicalism which seeks to elevate the populace into the governing class.’
End quote.And that, indeed, is the sympathy of all of those who call themselves ‘illumined’.
You see, we are all nothing but cattle, stupid animals.And they are the only ones who have truly mature mindsand thus, are the only ones with the right to rule.
The Ku Klux Klanand none of you were ever taught this, but it’s the truththe Ku Klux Klan (KKK) was founded in Tennessee in the late 1860s by the Southern Scottish Rite leadership under Albert Pike.The KKK drew its membership from the pre-Civil War Knights of the Golden Circle.
Judah P. Benjamin’s early role in sponsoring and protecting both the Knights of the Golden Circle and the Ku Klux Klan offers a crucial insight into the B’nai B’rith-ADL’s later role in fostering the revival of the KKK and the post-World War II period.
We shall return to that sordid tale, ladies and gentlemen, later in this series of broadcasts.
Another Rothschild and B’nai B’rith ally who enjoyed the political patronage of arch-Confederate John Slidell, August Belmont, was Judah Benjamin’s Northern counterpart.
A private secretary to the British House of Rothschild who arrived in New York City from London in 1837, Belmont rose to the Chairmanship of the Democratic Party, a position he held for 20 years.Belmont was a leading advocate of free trade and states’ rights, both cornerstones of the British reconquest scheme.
Prior to his emergence as a leading figure in the National Democratic Party, Belmont worked closely with the Charleston, South Carolina B’nai B’rith in fomenting radicalism among America’s youth.The effort was, in this case, run directly by the Mother Lodge of the Scottish Rite in England, then under the command of Britain’s Prime Minister, Lord Palmerston.
At Belmont’s behest, Charleston’s B’nai B’rith leader, Edwin Deleon , wrote a pamphlet in the early 1850s entitled, ‘The Position and Duties of Young Americans’.Deleon, whose family were slave traders, B’nai B’rith founders, and later leading Confederates, peddled free trade and openly advocated a strong Anglo-American alliance. While by today’s standards the appeal for a strong Anglo-American alliance may seem palatable to some, back in the middle of the nineteenth century, this was borderline treason.
Belmont’s Young America members were among the draft rioters and radical abolitionists who disrupted Lincoln’s Union war mobilization to the benefit of the Confederacy and England.
During the early phase of the Civil War, England tried repeatedly to intervene into the conflict with cease-fire plans that would have insured the permanent dissolution of the Union.
During the Civil War itself, while the majority of American Jews sided with the Northmake sure you understand this, folks, so you know that this is not a racist or anti-semitic program or reportthe majority of American Jews sided with the North and fought valiantly to preserve the Union, the B’nai B’rith was predominantly pro-Confederate. Even in New York City, the Lodges preached secession.
The Baltimore Hebrew Congregation, founded by Dutch Jews who made their money in the slave trade, heard sermons by Rabbi Morris Raphel and the following.And he said this, quote:
‘Who can blame our brethren of the South for their being inclined to secede from a society under whose government their ends cannot be attained, and whose Union is kept together by heavy iron ties of violence and arbitrary force?
‘Who can blame our brethren of the South for seceding from a society whose government cannot and will not protect property rights and privileges of a great portion of the Union?’
End quote.Following the Civil War and the assassination of President Lincoln, many of the Jewish slave and cotton traders from the south, typified by the Lehman Brothers, moved to New York City and became prominent in Wall Street banking and brokerages.
With the defeat of President Lincoln’s Reconstruction Program following his assassination, President Andrew Johnson pardoned the Scottish Rite insurrectionists….
Now, listen to this closely.
President Andrew Johnson pardoned the Scottish Rite insurrectionists, including General Albert Pike, and accepted a rank of 32nd Degree in the Southern Jurisdiction Freemasons.
That was his reward.
Suspected Lincoln assassination plotter, Simon Wolf, was also absolved of any criminal culpability for his wartime activities.
Only non-Freemasons and non-B’nai B’rith were prosecuted for the crimes they committed during the Civil War.
The legacy of British Freemasonic treachery against the Union survived intact, including the B’nai B’rith.
Although the slave trade nominally was banned in the United States as a result of Lincoln’s Emancipation Proclamation, a new form of slavery had already been launched by the British East India Company and its Scottish Rite Directors, including the same Lord Palmerston who had played so pivotal a role in the secessionist insurrection.
The new form of slavery was drugsopium.
Henry Carey , one of the architects of Abraham Lincoln’s Reconstruction Program and a leading proponent of the American System of Political Economy, warned about Britain’s opium war against China and India in his 1853 book, ‘The Slave Trade:Domestic and Foreign’.Get the book and read it.
He described the trade in, quote:
‘…that pernicious drug opium…’
end quote, as, quote:
‘…one of perfect free trade….’
End quote.Defeated in the secessionists’ insurrectionist plot, Britain and its fifth column of agents in both the North and the South would eventually regroup around a strategy for running an opium war against the United States.
As the reader will learn in later chapters, the B’nai B’rith and its Anti-Defamation League’s Secret Lodge played a central role in the drugging of America.
Let’s fast-forward to 1992, folks, in the nation’s capitol where B’nai B’rith lawyer Simon Wolf conspired on behalf of the Southern slave trade.
The streets in many parts of town are dominated now by drug traffickers whose deadly poison has inflicted both a subculture of addiction and violence and a spread of AIDS among the predominantly black population.
Community-based efforts led by the Nation of Islam have begun to roll back that new subculture of slavery and despair, restoring safety and dignity to some of the most desperately poor neighborhoods in the United States.
And as soon as they began to be successful, they came under attack by the ADL.
True to its history, the B’nai B’rith/ADL intercedes to turn back the clock to the days of slavery, for drug addiction is a form of euphemistic slavery, and those who are addicted are subject to the whims of those who have enslaved them.
They can even control which way society goes, ladies and gentlemen.You see, if they want to create more crime in order to take rights away from the peopleindeed, to make the people scream to have their rights taken away in order to take the fear away, get the crime and the drugs off our streetsthey just elevate the price of the drugs so that the poor addict cannot afford to pay for them.So, he has to go out and steal, and rob, and mug somebody and even kill to satisfy the terrible craving of his flesh.
You never thought of it that way, did you?But it’s true.
Want to make it look like the police are succeeding?Want to make a politician look good?Lower the price of drugs way down to almost nothing and crime disappears overnight.
One of these days, you’ll begin to understand how we’ve all been enslaved for most of our livesall of us:Caucasian, Jew, black, Indian, Oriental… it doesn’t make any difference.We’ve all been lied to.We’ve all been deceived.We’ve all been manipulated.And we’ve all been puppets on the end of somebody’s strings.It is the purpose of ‘The Hour of the Time’ to stop that.
I’m not so foolish as to think we’re going to be successful and stop it all, but we may be able to stop most of it.And we may be able to hang those that are responsible by their neck from a lamp-post until they’re dead, once they’ve been legally apprehended and tried by a jury of their peersonce the truth is known.
But the Illuminati, ladies and gentlemen, not the Jews, is in control of the judicial system.The Illuminati, Freemasons, sit on the benches of every court in this nation.
First, ladies and gentlemen, when this happened, the ADL set off a massive wave of anger and resentment in the African American community when in June 1992 it published ‘The Anti-Semitism of Black Demagogues and Extremists’.
The widely-circulated ADL report is a frontal attack on the Nation of Islam and its leader, Minister Louis Farrakhan. It openly threatens retribution against any elected officials or political activists who associate with or publicly commend the Nation of Islam.
I’ve commended them many times on ‘The Hour of the Time’, and will continue to do that.I condemn them for their racism, but I applaud them and admire them for what they have done for the black community.No one else has done so much to bring them up out of poverty and give them a sense of self-worth, and bring their families together and where they stay together.No one else has taken the drugs off the streets like the Nation of Islam.
In July 1992, a major uproar developed in Washington, D.C. when the ADL, ladies and gentlementhe ADL, the Anti-Defamation League of B’nai B’rithwas caught red-handed in an ugly attempt to shut down any government contact with what has been the only effective effort to clean up drug and crime-infested areas in the nation’s capitol: the Nation of Islam’s now famous ‘Dope Busters’.
If you’ve investigated what happened in Waco, Texas, ladies and gentlemen, you always run up against the ADL and B’nai B’rith.They instigated it.They brought it into being.They promoted it.They pressed it.And they are the ones who released the lies to the press around the country that kept the American people in the dark.
When Washington, D.C. Mayor Sharon Pratt Kelly issued an official proclamation honoring Nation of Islam leader, Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad, for his leadership in the Dope Busters campaign, and for his ground-breaking work in treating AIDS patients with Immuno-virun , an African-developed anti-AIDS drug, the ADL went absolutely insane.
They had ignored these people until they began to take the drugs off the streets.Make sure you understand that.
Kelly was repeatedly hit with ADL-organized delegations demanding that the proclamation be rescinded lest she, too, be identified as an anti-semite.And this is how they blackmail leaders, and police chiefs, and mayors, and military officers into doing their bidding for fear of being labelled anti-semitic.
You’ve all learned you can call me whatever you want. It doesn’t make any difference.I’ll tell the truth no matter what.Always.Always.
When she refused, the ADL engaged in a national barrage of media attacks against the Nation of Islam.The attacks culminated in an article run in the ‘Washington Times’ co-authored by ADL National Director Abe Foxman and Fact-Finding Director Myra Lansky Bolland.
Ultimately, Kelly succumbed to ADL demands and issued an open letter to the community in which she continued to praise Dr. Muhammad’s work against drugs, violence, and AIDS, but condemned alleged anti-semitic statements attributed to him by the ADL.
You see how it works, folks?She caved in because she was afraid she wouldn’t be re-elected mayor in the next election.She lost my respect.She probably lost a lot of people’s respect.But she doesn’t care.Her political career is safe.
What was really at the heart of the ‘Washington Times’ articlewhich was otherwise a potpourri of outrageous and unsubstantiated charges against the Nation of Islamwas a demand that Congress defeat the major appropriations bill for the Department of Housing and Urban Development over the question of whether HUD rules should permit a HUD contractor to hire the Dope Busters to provide security for a federally-subsidized housing project in Los Angeles.
The ADL was particularly upset about the national attention the successful Dope Busters drug eradication program was getting.
The Dope Busters were founded in Washington, D.C. in 1988.Since then, unarmed Dope Buster patrols have been able to eradicate drug trafficking at the street level in nine Washington ghetto neighborhoods and private housing projects, completely and totally disrupting the plans of the Illuminati to control those people.
They’ve done this with no deaths, and very, very little violence.
Exemplary of the success of the program is the Mayfair Mansions Housing Complex in northeast Washington. Mayfair Mansions went from an ugly, unsafe, open-air drug market in 1988 to being a handsomely restored, safe, vibrant community as a result of Dope Buster patrols.
When HUD Secretary Jack Kemp visited Mayfair Mansions earlier this year [1992], he admitted that the Nation of Islam’s Dope Busters deserved the credit, and indicated that he was open to granting the patrols federal government contracts.
Actually, it wasn’t this year, ladies and gentlemen.It was in 1992.
Tenants in public and private housing projects from New York to Baltimore to Los Angeles are demanding Dope Buster patrols.In most cases, the idea has the support of local police and government agencies who have failed to find any other effective way to curtail the intensifying pattern of drug trafficking and violence.
In almost every case, the ADL has attempted to block the tenants’ choice of security force.The tenant leaders who refuse to back down have been subjected to threats, harassments, break-ins, and other forms of intimidation.
This time, however, the ADL may have committed a fatal error in launching such an open and vicious attack on the Nation of Islam.
Dr. Abdul Alim Muhammad is not only a leader of the Nation of Islam, he is one of the most respected community leaders in the Washington area, and his pioneering work against AIDS is gaining him international recognition.
The black and Hispanic communities in the United States are disproportionately infected by the deadly virus, but have had almost no access to the accepted treatment which consists of the prohibitively expensive and highly toxic AZT, DDI, or DDC.
And as we have revealed on this program, those drugs may really be the cause of death of AIDS patients.
Dr. Muhammad and New York City physician, Dr. Barbara Justice , have reported dramatic success in treating more than 600 patients who are HIV positive with Immuno-virun, the drug they brought back from Kenya.
The pair is also credited with bringing vital information concerning this new treatment modality to both the general public and the medical profession, taking the point in a courageous effort to avert what would otherwise be the worst holocaust to hit the human race.
Similarly, the ADL’s charges against the Dope Busters carry little credibility and leave the ADL completely exposed as nothing more than a protection racket for the drug carteland THAT, ladies and gentlemen, is the truth.
The Dope Busters enjoy the intense support of the communities they serve, and have an unprecedented record of success.Wherever they go, the Dope Busters convey an unmistakable message of hope and inspiration to the community that the war on drugs can be won.
Interviews with the residents of the communities served by the Dope Busters make clear that they believe that it is that message, and nothing else, that has made the Nation of Islam and the Dope Busters a target of ADL attack.
In a community where the twin plagues of drug addiction and AIDS are the most visible vestiges of slavery, the ADL has shown that despite the passage of time, its true loyalties lie with the slave masters.
Now, in 1985, the ADL proudly gave its Torch of Liberty Award to Las Vegas businessman Morris Barney Dalitz .
You don’t know who that is, do you?
The award ceremonya strictly black tie affairwas given front-page attention in the League’s monthly bulletin which praised Delitz as a great philanthropist who had donated generously to the ADL over the years.
Delitz’s generosity was motivated by a lot more than an impulse to help out a favorite charity.As one of the most important figures in organized crime over a period of 60 years, and as a lifetime, right-hand man to organized crime’s twentieth century Chairman of the Board, Meyer Lansky, Mo Delitz was well aware of the fact that the Anti-Defamation League was, from its founding, a powerful, secret arm of the Illuminatithe go-between between the national crime syndicate and the respectable arms of the secret organization that is out to control the world.
Without the ADL’s undaunted public relations work on behalf of organized crime, the United States would have never been flooded with illegal drugs, and gangsters like Delitz, and Lansky would have long ago been carted off to the penitentiary.
Delitz was one of the kingpins of the Prohibition Era bootlegging business.And he, along with three other gangstersMorris Kleinman , Sam Tucker, and Louis Rothkoff ran the Cleveland underworld, their self-described ‘Jewish Navy’end quotesmuggled rot-gut whiskey across the Great Lakes from Canada into the midwest United States.
Now don’t get all carried away by the term ‘Jewish Navy’, because the Irish gangsters called themselves the ‘Irish whatever-they-were-called’.It’s human nature.
On the Canadian side of the lakes, the booze was manufactured by the Bronfman gang, led by Sam and Abe Bronfman, second generation Rumanian immigrants, whose father had been brought over to Canada by the B’nai B’rith-allied Baron de Herschfund and had set up a string of whore houses.
Sam and Abe used their Pure Drug Company, which was established with the help of the Hudson’s Bay Company, to manufacture illegal whisky during the Canadian Prohibitionwhich was 1915 to 1919.
When Canada legalized booze after learning their lesson, and the United States instituted its ban a year laternot having learned anythingthey were all ready to become the major suppliers to the gangsters south of the border.
United States government documentsthese are government documentsfrom the Prohibition Era claimed that over 34,000 Americans died of alcohol poisoning drinking the Bronfman brewnot from drinking alcohol, folks, but from drinking this specific brew.
It was poison.
Today, Sam Bronfman’s son, Edgar, is a National Commissioner of the ADL and the head of its powerful New York Appeal.And we’ll pick his trail up later, for he’s dirty, too.
Following Prohibition, Mo Delitz became the undisputed crime boss of Cleveland, expanding his criminal operations gambling, labor, racketeering, money laundering, tax evasionfrom Hollywood and Las Vegas to Miami.
One of his Miami investments, a night spot called the Frolic Club, was a joint-venture with Meyer Lansky.
When Lansky moved into Cuba to open his first off-shore gambling, narcotics, and money laundering haven, Dalitz was brought in as a privileged partner.
When Lansky and the other directors of the national crime syndicate decided that his long-time partner, Benjamin ‘Bugsy’ Segal , had become a liability and had to be assassinated, it was Dalitz who assumed the lion’s share of Segal’s Las Vegas casino interestsinterests he still holds, ladies and gentlemen, today.
Lansky and Segal had formed the original Murder, Inc.otherwise known as the Meyer and Bugsy Gangto enforce the creation of a national crime syndicate overseeing the Prohibition Era illegal liquor and narcotics traffic.
>From the very outset, Delitz had been a member of the national commission of the crime syndicate.
Up until Lansky’s death in 1983, Delitz was a regular visitor to the crime boss’s Miami Beach condo, and was widely presumed by law enforcement officials to be one of the primary heirs to Lansky’s crime empire.
Now, just two years after Lansky’s death, Delitz was publicly surfaced as an ADL philanthropist.It was a sign of the times.
By the beginning of the 1980’s Decade of Greed, drug moneynarco-dollarshad already replaced petro-dollars as the primary source of liquidity to fuel the stock market and real estate
speculative bubbles facilitated by the Carter and Reagan Administration’s deregulation of the banking, savings and loan, and brokerage industries.
As the power of drug money grew, so, too, did the political and financial clout of the ADL.
Junk bond swindlers like Ivan Boesky and Michael Milken, and dope bankers like Edmond Saffra not to mention Mo Dalitzregularly poured millions into the ADL war chest.
In return for this largesse, the ADL publicly branded anyone who challenged the clout of organized crime as a died-in-the-wool anti-semite.
The lionizing of mobster Delitz was the ADL’s way of boasting that their public relations work over a 70-year period had paid off.
But things were not always so easy.
You see, the ADL had been founded shortly after the turn of the century as a Jewish defense arm of the B’nai B’rith, the nominally Jewish secret society sponsored and controlled by the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry, with its headquarters in the Temple of the Supreme Council of the Southern Jurisdiction of the Scottish Rite of Freemasonry just 13 blocks from the White House in Washington, D.C., and by some of the leading British and American white, Anglo-Saxon, protestant families, including the Bush family.
B’nai B’rith Washington, D.C. representative Simon Wolfthe man whom Lincoln’s Secret Service Chief Lafayette C. Baker had arrested as a Confederate spy and Union blockade runner during the Civil Warwas now working closely with President Theodore Roosevelt in mobilizing Jewish American support for the overthrow of the Russian Czar.
According to Wolf’s 1918 autobiography, he had met secretly with President Roosevelt at his Sagamore Hills estate in New York, and had launched an international drive to brand the Czarist regime as anti-semitic.
After a series of meetings and correspondence with Russia’s Prime Minster, Count Sergei Witt , arranged by Roosevelt, Wolf had denounced the Russian regime for reneging on its promises to curb anti-Jewish pogromsafter which American Jewish organizations, led from behind the scenes by the B’nai B’rith, began funneling guns to the anti-Czarist insurrectionists.
Thus, B’nai B’rith played an active role in the Russian Revolution of 1905 and the formation of the Soviet Union.
This activity would lead to widespread allegations that prominent American Jews were pro-Bolshevik.
The Warburg family of Kuhn-Loeb and Company did fundDID FUNDit’s a matter of recordV. I. Lenin and Leon Trotsky.
And father and son Bolshevik agents, Julius and Armand Hammer, who helped found the United States Communist Party, did actively spread the Bolshevik cause in America and spent a decade in the Soviet Union following the 1917 Revolution.
These allegations of pro-Communist sentiments, while grounded in well-publicized scandalous actions by prominent Jewish families, missed the mark.
In fact, the plot to bring down the Czar and install the Bolsheviks in power in Russia served long-standing Illuminati and geo-political interests of the sort advanced by the Scottish Rite.
And Britain feared the development of a Eurasian alliance among France, Germany, Russia, Japan and China, based on economic cooperation and facilitated by the building of a transcontinental system of railroads linking the east to the west.Such a transcontinental railroad system would render Britain’s domination over the seas relatively unimportant.
We’ll continue this on Monday.Good night, and God bless you all.

JASPER, ALBERTA:- A video shot by a local resident denying the Holocaust has been widely condemned by the community and at least one resident has filed a formal complaint with the Alberta Human Rights Commission.
On June 17, Monika Schaefer, a well-known Jasper resident and former Green Party candidate, appeared in a video on Youtube denying the Holocaust. The video was subsequently posted on her Facebook page.
MonikaSchaeferTruth
‘This is the most persistent and pernicious lie in all of history,’ said Schaefer, about the Holocaust.
In the video she described the Holocaust as the ‘the six-million lie’ in reference to the six million Jews who lost their lives at the hands of the Nazis during the Second World War.
The six-minute video quickly went viral and garnered more than 30,000 views at the time of publishing.
At the end of the video Schaefer invited viewers to read several books published by Holocaust deniers, including Ernst Zündel, who lived in Canada for four decades before being deported to his native Germany where he was imprisoned for five years for denying the Holocaust.
ErnstZVictim copyKen Kuzminski, president of the Jasper Royal Canadian Legion, described the video as hate speech.
‘Monika has a right to say whatever she wants to say, but once she’s published it I feel that’s moved on to hate speech,’ said Kuzminski.
‘She can stand up and say whatever she wants, but she has to accept the consequences of doing that.’
He said he has written a formal complaint to the Alberta Human Rights Commission, contacted the local RCMP detachment and the German embassy.
‘By her denying that this ever happened it perpetuates hatred, racism and discrimination,’ said Kuzminski, adding he’s heard from several young people in town that they no longer feel safe.
‘This is not the community we are and what we believe in.’
The Alberta Human Rights Commission neither confirmed nor denied it had received a formal complaint.
‘All of the information that comes into the human rights commission with regards to complaints is confidential,’ said Susan Coombes, with the Alberta Human Rights Commission.
With that said, she said any complaint involving hate would fall under section three of the Alberta Human Rights Act.
‘It’s really difficult to prove,’ said Coombes, about whether someone is in violation of the act. ‘What you have to do is say that there was intent to incite hate.’
The Jasper RCMP confirmed it was aware of the video, but said no formal investigation has been launched.
‘At this time what I can say is that I’m aware the video exists and it was brought to my attention,’ said RCMP Sgt. Rick Bidaisee. ‘Discussions are ongoing.’
Schaefer said she stood by her comments in the video during a telephone interview July 11.
‘Right now the issue for me is freedom of speech,’ said Schaefer. ‘Last I checked I thought we had freedom of speech in Canada and suddenly I’m the criminal.’
She confirmed she shot the video in Germany, where it is illegal to deny the Holocaust.
‘If we don’t have the right to question a historical event then we don’t have freedom of speech,’ said Schaefer.
Schaefer was slated to perform during Canada Day, but was pulled from the schedule after the Canada Day committee learned a group of residents were going to protest her performance.
‘We had really reliable information that there was going to be a protest and in the interests of public safety and her safety for that matter, we decided it would just be in everybody’s best interests if she stood down for this year,’ said Pattie Pavlov, general manager for the Jasper Park Chamber of Commerce.
Kuzminski confirmed she is also banned from the legion.
The Centre for Israel and Jewish Affairs (CIJA) quickly condemned the video after learning of its existence.
CIJABomb copy 2
‘As a Holocaust denier, Ms. Schaefer, who appears in this absurd video, has earned her place on the very margins of society,’ wrote Martin Sampson, director of communications for CIJA.
‘Her comments would be laughable but for the intense pain they cause the survivor community and their descendants. Denying the Holocaust exposes her as an anti-Semitic ignoramus.’
‘The truth is the Holocaust was industrialized, state-sponsored murder committed by the Nazis against the Jewish people. It is the most well documented genocide—by both perpetrator and victim—in history. To deny this fact is to spit in the face of truth.’
News that a formal complaint was lodged with the Alberta Human Rights Commission, comes after Prime Minister Justin Trudeau visited the Auschwitz-Birkenau concentration camp, on July 10 in Poland, where one million people, mostly Jews, were killed in the Second World War.
——
Source Article
Paul Clarke
[email protected]

Dear Free Speech Defenders and Radical Press Supporters,
It’s been close to a year since I last posted a Legal Update back on August 8th, 2015. That was prior to the actual trial which began on October 26th, 2015 and concluded fourteen days later on November 12th, 2015.
The outcome of the trial, as many will know, resulted in a Guilty charge on Count 1 and a Not Guilty charge on Count 2. What was perplexing for everyone who heard the results (including myself) was that BOTH Counts 1 and 2 were the same charge, that is, both were a Sec. 319(2) Criminal Code of Canada offence which reads:
‘(2) Every one who, by communicating statements, other than in private conversation, wilfully promotes hatred against any identifiable group is guilty of
(a) an indictable offence and is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding two years; or
(b) an offence punishable on summary conviction.’
Immediately following the trial a date was set for December 7th, 2015 in order to fix a date for the Charter application hearing to be heard. The Charter issue had already began back in the spring of 2015 but was postponed pending the outcome of the trial. Had I been victorious and found Not Guilty on both counts there would not have been grounds to file the challenge to the legislation. That date came and went and Crown and Defence were unable to agree upon a date for the hearing. It was put over to January 25th, 2016. On the January date issues came up about Defence calling Expert Witnesses and so it was rescheduled to March 29th, 2016 to fix a date. March 29th came and went and more delays required the setting a new date of April 4th. The 4th of April came and went and another date of May 2nd was chosen. On May 2nd the computers in the courtroom malfunctioned causing further delays and a new date of June 6th was set. On June 6th Defence counsel’s computer went down and a new date of July 11th, 2016 was set. After eight months and seven attempts to fix a date the deed was finally accomplished on the 11th of July!
As it now stands the Charter application will be heard in Quesnel Supreme Court beginning October 3rd, 2016 and run (possibly) for the full week to October 7th, 2016.
As stated previously, I, as the Applicant will be raising the following issues; ones that are included in my Memorandum of Argument:
• Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
• The Crown bears the onus of justifying the infringement of Charter rights on a case-by-case basis.
• The present case is distinguishable from Keegstra on its facts.
• The infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter is not reasonably justified by Section 1 in the circumstances of this case, and specifically: The ‘pressing and substantial objective’ of legislation must be defined narrowly for the purpose of a Section 1 analysis.
• The use of Section 319(2) in this case is not rationally connected to the pressing and substantial objective of preventing harms associated with hate propaganda.
• Criminal prosecution by indictment is not a minimal impairment of the Applicant’s Charter rights.
• The infringement of the Applicant’s Charter rights is disproportionate to any possible salutary effect that Section 319(2) could have in the circumstances of this case.
• The appropriate remedy is to read into the law a constitutional exemption, to the effect that Section 319(2) is not a reasonable limit on Section 2(b) in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.
The bottom line is that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter of Rights and Freedoms which states:
‘Everyone has the following fundamental freedoms: …
(b) freedom of thought, belief, opinion and expression, including freedom of the press and other media of communication …’
The Order that I intend to pursue is based upon Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982 reads as follows:
‘52. (1) The Constitution of Canada is the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect.’
Citing R. v. Sharpe in support of Section 52(1) I will be respectfully requesting an order that would read as follows:
A declaration that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code constitutes an infringement of Section 2(b) of the Charter, as already established in R. v. Keegstra.
A declaration, pursuant to Section 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, that Section 319(2) of the Criminal Code is not reasonably justified by Section 1 of the Charter in circumstances where the allegedly hateful material is legal to possess and lawfully available from other sources.
Crown of course will be arguing that the applicant’s (my) argument is entirely without merit.
Now that the date has been set there is still the responsibility on my part to cover a number of financial costs related to the hiring of Expert Witnesses and also travel expenses and accommodations for legal assistants who I will be bringing to Quesnel for the week of the Charter hearing. These and many other miscellaneous costs that are part of this ongoing process must be raised over the next two months in order accomplish our goals. Any help that people can offer will be gratefully accepted and put to good use.
Donations can be made online via my GoGetFunding site located at http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/ or else by sending cash, cheques or Money Orders to the following postal address. Please make sure that any cheques or Money Orders are made out to Arthur Topham and sent to:
Arthur Topham
4633 Barkerville Highway
Quesnel, B.C.
V2J 6T8
Thank You All for your ongoing help throughout this long process!

The University of Lethbridge is defending a professor’s right to use his position to promote conspiracy theories online, including the idea that the 2014 Parliament Hill shooting in Ottawa was a scheme to keep Stephen Harper in power; the Sandy Hook massacre was staged to promote gun control; and Jewish Zionists are waging a secret war to demonize Muslims around the world through control of western media. Anthony Hall is a tenured member within the U of L’s Faculty of Arts and Science. He has a history of activism that includes being arrested during protests at the Summit of the Americas in Quebec City in 2001, protesting wars in the Middle East, and battling for the rights of First Nations people.

Since late December, Hall has been a co-host on a weekly YouTube program called ‘False Flag Weekly News’ with fellow conspiracy theorists Kevin Barrett, an Arabist-Islamologist, and James Fetzer, a professor of Philosophy Emeritus.
FFWN promotes the idea of a global Zionist conspiracy to create hatred against Muslims by promoting an alternative narrative of Muslim extremism through global ‘false flag’ terror events. These events include just about every large-scale terror attack and mass shooting since the 9/11 attack on the World Trade Center, which is seen as a sort of ‘Ground Zero’ for this secret war.
Both Barrett and Fetzer are noted Holocaust deniers, and Hall has questioned established facts which happened during the Second World War.
In a prepared statement, Craig Cooper, Dean of Arts and Science, stated the U of L does not dictate research areas to faculty members and supports Hall’s right to ‘pursue the research topics of his choosing.’
‘The university doesn’t always agree with the opinions expressed by faculty members but recognizes their rights to express them,’ the statement read.
Hall could not be reached for comment, despite multiple attempts by The Herald, but there are more than six months of weekly broadcasts on YouTube where he spoke freely on a number of topics.
There was a discussion about a Twitter A.I. chatbot named ‘Tay’ developed by Microsoft, which started randomly posting anti-Semitic tweets such as ‘Hitler was right I hate the Jews’ after it was bombarded by internet trolls was supported on FFWN.
Hall referenced the book ‘Tell the Truth, Shame the Devil’ by Gerard Menuhin, which claims to show proof the Holocaust is a myth. He stated the book causes a ‘very dramatic re-looking at what happened in Europe in World War 2.’
‘So I’m reading that text and having to reassess a lot of ideas,’ Hall said. ‘So maybe Tay is actually on to something here.’
During a discussion on the March 2016 Lahore, Pakistan, terror attack that left 75 dead and hundreds injured, Barrett discussed how more Muslims than Christians were killed, but CNN was reporting it as a Muslim attack on Christians.
He went on to say CNN is run by Jewish Zionists like all other major media. Hall then accused CNN political anchor Wolf Blitzer of being a leader in this conspiracy.
‘Let’s face it. The media is dominated by ethnically Jewish Zionists, and some of them may not be completely on board with the neo-con agenda, but it sure looks like a lot of them are,’ said Barrett.
‘And Wolf Blitzer, of course, is one of the chief Zionists in the whole U.S. media,’ said Hall. ‘He is one of the point people.’
During a discussion of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting, where 20 young children and six adults were killed by shooter Adam Lanza, Fetzer said the school had been shut down since 2008 and that the shooting never actually happened. He accused the families of faking the story and collecting between $27 million and $130 million collectively.
Hall stated his impression was that Sandy Hook was not the usual type of false flag event designed to instil hatred of Muslims.
‘My understanding is that it was about gun control,’ he said on the show.
In a discussion about noted white nationalist and former Ku Klux Klan Grand Wizard David Duke, Hall referred to the need for Duke to have an audience to be able to air his views.
‘Thinking people, as David Duke is, intelligent people, some of their theories are good, and some of them not-so-good. (Duke) deserves an audience. He has some very astute analysis of things going on. And some of his ideas are objectionable.’
Barrett and Hall’s discussion on the 2014 Parliament Hill shooting described a False Flag event designed to push an anti-Islam agenda to win the election for Stephen Harper. They said that attempt failed and Trudeau took power.
A discussion about swaying public opinion through mass media involved the Ottawa shooting and how convenient that there were photos of shooter Michael Zehaf-Bibeau at the Canadian National War Memorial during the event.
‘Supposedly, the image shows him with a gun at the place where he was supposed to have killed Nathan Cirillo. Where did the picture come from?’ Hall asked.
He went on to describe the images and footage released during the first hours of the events as ‘low level productions,’ with dummies being blown up and ‘ketchup being sprayed here and there.’
‘They really didn’t have a good budget for their stage management of the whole thing,’ Hall said.
The Herald reached out to the Lethbridge Jewish community, for a response, and was provided with the following statement:
‘Mr. Hall’s statements and theories are so outlandish, venomous, and without substance, that we cannot even begin to dignify them with a response.’
In defending Hall, Cooper noted the role of universities in ‘ensuring our societies are free and improve through the critical analysis undertaken through research and the tenet of academic freedom. Academic freedom is necessary so that all topics can be fully explored in the absence of external influence, popular opinion or conventional wisdom.’

British politician George Galloway sits with Palestinian students near their school, the al-Fadelah Islamic school, destroyed during Israel’s 22-day offensive that ended in January, in Rafah in the southern Gaza Strip on March 11, 2009. (Ibraheem Abu Mustafa/Reuters
_______________________________________________________________________
[Editor’s Note: The following letter addressed to Jason Kenney the Federal government shill responsible for barring MP George Galloway from speaking to real Canadians on real, substantive issues of sovereignty and social democracy and freedom of speech by Wayne Prante is a fine response to the minister’s kowtowing stance toward the Zionist lobbyists like B’nai Brith Canada, the Canadian Jewish Congress and this Jewish Defense League mossad operative who was able to influence our government into shaming itself before the whole world!
It’s bloody well time that Canadians come out of their mind-controlled stupor and realize just how detrimental these foreign lobbyists are to our national security and our identity as a democratic, freedom-loving people who value our sacred rights to free speech and association.
Recent events in Calgary where we saw our police agencies working overtime to protect the world’s most recent and diabolical war criminal, George Bush Jr. so he could continue to bullshit his way about the world claiming fame when he ought to be in jail is another blow to Canada’s sovereignty and pride. Rather than arrest the global killer they wasted their energy on arresting and beating up the one man of courage, John Boncore, aka Splitting-the-Sky, who had the balls to do what the cops should have done at the onset of this travesty of human rights.ÂÂ
We need thousands upon thousands of Canadians writing letters to these Zionist lackeys in Ottawa telling them their days are numbered. In case you don’t have Jason Kenney’s email address why I just happen to have it handy. See the bottom of this post for his contacts. Write, fax or phone the shill and let him know how YOU feel about the sell-out of our country to the Zionist lobbyists.
My sincere thanks to Mr. Prante for showing courage and honesty at a time when others are only showing apathy and cowardice.]
_________________________________________________________
To: Prime Minister/Premier ministre [email protected]
Office of the Prime Minister / Cabinet du Premier ministre
From: ‘Wayne Prante’ [email protected]
Subject : REGARDING THE BARRING OF THE HONOURABLE MR. GEORGE GALLOWAY, MP (UK)
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
JKenneyZioshillBanner
Dear Mr. Kenney, et al
Mr. Galloway should absolutely be allowed to visit and speak in MY Canada!
I would be honoured to have a man of his honesty, integrity and moral character speaking to Canadians, indeed, as a guest speaker in the House of Commons of Canada, as moral character is something which is sadly lacking there! I’m sure you might learn a thing or two.
Mr. Galloway has NOT supported terrorism as the JDL suggests, but rather, has tried to assist human beings in need of aid, to tried to avert the catastrophe of innocents, and eliminate needless human suffering. He is to be RESPECTED and COMMENDED, not barred. At least, that is how the Canada I was born in would react.
The JDL does not speak for the majority of Canadians, but merely presumes to. Need I remind you, that you, and your government are OUR servants Mr. Kenny, and are there at the pleasure of Canadians, not the JDL theoretically anyways. Your actions, however, give us great cause to doubt that.
It is YOU sir, the JDL, and other political Zionist groups in this country, who are acting like WWII Nazis* and undermining freedom and democracy, not only here at home, but around the world. It is YOU who are supporting rogue nations and ‘aiding and abetting’ terrorists and ‘war criminals’, and fighting illegal wars. It is YOU who are responsible for the deaths of well over a hundred fine Canadian soldiers. And it is YOU who is bringing shame upon Canada, for the all of the above, as well as by barring peace activists and humanitarians to Canada, while allowing the likes of Bush and other former members of his rogue government come and go at will.
jasonkennyplusCJC.jpg
Kenny (center job) with his CJC buds discussing ‘anti-Semitism’
________________________________________________________
Modern day Israel was itself brought into existence by terrorism perpetrated by Zionists against the UK (and by extension, the Commonwealth, which includes Canada), but now Israel is considered a legitimate ‘democratic’ nation. Do we not see a contradiction here? Most Canadians that I speak to see that very clearly.
The JDL, which you apparently support and legitimize has in fact been branded a terrorist organization by the FBI. Hamas, on the other hand, has been democratically elected by the Palestinians and your failure to recognize that is racist, hypocritical, and shameful.
Evidence? Let me kindly refer you to an article which has just been published in the Guardian, documenting Israeli War Crimes, admitted to by it’s own former soldiers:
‘Gaza war crime claims gather pace as more troops speak out Fresh allegations have come to light that gung-ho leadership inculcated a culture of disregard for Palestinian casualties.’ http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2009/mar/22/israel-palestinian-territories-war-crimes (March 22nd, 2009)
Here is a quote:
‘An investigation by a group of former Israeli soldiers has uncovered new evidence of the military’s conduct during the assault on Gaza two months ago. According to the group Breaking the Silence, the witness statements of the 15 soldiers who have come forward to describe their concerns over Operation Cast Lead appear to corroborate claims of random killings and vandalism carried out during the operation made by a separate group of anonymous servicemen during a seminar at a military college..’
By your definition, I guess that makes those former Israeli soldiers ‘hate criminals’ and ‘terrorist supporters’ for speaking out, and me one too for daring to repeat it, as opposed to the obvious conclusion that the government of Israel has committed crimes against humanity, with the complicity and endorsement of your government.
Perhaps what you really need to do is ban the JDL and other Zionist lobby groups for supporting war criminals and terrorists, in the rogue nation of Israel, and stop them from spreading hate, fear and propaganda in Canada?
HarperZioflag
‘We stand on guard for thee’ Oh Israel!!!
_______________________________________
When you speak of supporting Hamas as a ‘terrorist organization’, let us also not forget Mr. Kenney, that we in Canada recognize two separatist parties from Quebec, certain members of which might now still be planting bombs and blowing people up, were it not for official recognition of them. Has the Quebec Crisis gone down the political memory hole too? Is the irony lost on you?
No, Mr. Galloway is not a problem at all for most Canadians. Hearing him would be very refreshing, given the drivel we get from the likes of you. It is YOU and your government, who have lost the respect and support of the Canadian people, are out of touch with reality, and have no legitimacy, much less ‘moral’ authority to govern and represent us.
Your recent negligence and dereliction of duty to act against the ‘reasonably suspected’ international war criminal George W. Bush adds further evidence of this, as well as the arrest of the one man in this country who had the courage and moral character to attempt to perform a citizen’s arrest of Mr. Bush in Calgary (which the Government of Canada was legally obligated to do). This not only adds insult to injury, it makes you complicit in war crimes, by aiding and abetting!
STS/BushProtest
John Boncore, aka Splitting-the-Sky, attempting to arrest war criminal George W. Bush in Calgary
_____________________________________________________________________________
In the interest of ‘Peace, Order and Good Government’, the ‘honourable’ thing for you to do Mr. Kenney, Mr. Harper, et al, is resign!
Not, however, because I have any more faith in the sitting opposition parties, who also have no moral character or backbone, but on principle, assuming you even comprehend the term.
Canadians of good, moral character are outraged, ashamed, disgusted and fed up with ALL of you, and are sick and tired of seeing their county’s good name being dragged through the mud.
Sincerely,
Wayne Prante,
Maple Ridge, BC
V2X 4E1
——————
* My preference would have been to have compared these Zionists to their fore-runners the Bosheviks of the former USSR. Ed.
Reply from Harper’s office:
REGARDING THE BARRING OF THE HONOURABLE MR. GEORGE GALLOWAY, MP (UK):
On Tue, 3/24/09, Prime Minister/Premier ministre [email protected] wrote:
Letter to PM Harper regarding the Barring of the Honorable Mr. George Galloway MP by Wayne Prante
From: Prime Minister/Premier ministre [email protected]
Office of the Prime Minister / Cabinet du Premier ministre
To: ‘Wayne Prante’ [email protected]
Tuesday, March 24, 2009
Dear Mr. Prante:
On behalf of the Right Honourable Stephen Harper, I would like to thank you for your recent e-mail.
Please be assured that your comments have been noted and that they will receive due consideration from the Minister, who has already received a copy of your correspondence.
L.A. Lavell
Executive Correspondence Officer
for the Prime Minister’s Office
Agent de correspondance
de la haute direction
pour le Cabinet du Premier ministre

On May 17th, 2016, a day recognized by the federal government as ‘International Day Against Homophobia, Transphobia, and Biphobia’, an edict emanated forth from Prime Minister Justin Trudeau’s office (PMO) stating that the Liberal government was planning to make additional changes to the ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws (Sections 318 to 320) of the Criminal Code of Canada in order to ‘protect’ the nation’s sexually deviant members.
UpYoursTrudeauJr
The unabashed and strident manner in which the federal government is pushing forward with its controversial agenda of planned perversion and subversion of Canadian society (under the guise of supposed ‘human rights’ for sexual aberrants) is an issue fraught with deep and troubling concern, not only those Canadians of the Christian faith who prefer to rely upon the eternal wisdom of God and Nature but also for millions of other citizens whose moral standards won’t permit them to accept the subversive and sinister hidden aim within the government’s mandate to criminalize public dissent and discussion on moral, ethical and health standards affecting the nation as a whole.
In the words of the PM, ‘To do its part, the Government of Canada today will introduce legislation that will help ensure transgender and other gender-diverse people can live according to their gender identity, free from discrimination, and protected from hate propaganda and hate crimes.’
FREEXPRESSIONLOCKUP copy 4
The reality that the federal government intends to expand rather than repeal Section 318 320 of the Canadian Criminal Code is disconcerting in itself given the excessively subjective nature of this draconian section of the Code. The concept of ‘Hate Propaganda’ as a ‘criminal offence’ is nothing less than a blatant example of government mind control; one that, here in Canada, has proven itself over the last half century of contentious litigation, to be extremely controversial, provocative and unjust and a clear and present danger to freedom of expression or ‘free speech’ as defined by Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The alarm bells ought to be ringing across the country at the thought of this new ‘Liberal’ government of Justin Trudeau pulling the Orwellian zipper of censorship even tighter over the mouths of Canada’s citizens than his predecessor Harper. It appears to be a new day but still the same old shit of increasingly repressive laws and greater restrictions on individual freedoms theoretically guaranteed by our Charter.
5FeetFury copy
In fact the threat of expanding Canada’s ‘hate’ laws to include ‘Tranny’(i.e. transvestite) protection has already angered and incensed Canadian bloggers as we see in the following reaction by Kathy Shaidle, one of the veterans of the previous ‘Section 13’ wars that were ongoing during Harper’s reign.
As I’ve stated numerous times and especially in my essay Bad Moon Rising: How the Jewish Lobbies Created Canada’s ‘Hate Propaganda’ Laws, these Communist-inspired laws were surreptitiously and deliberately put in place through the mendacious actions of various Jewish lobby organizations such as the Canadian Jewish Congress, B’nai Brith Canada and, more recently, the newly-formed Centre for Israel & Jewish Affairs, all of whom have worked in tandem for decades to ensure that issues to do with Israel and its Zionist ideological political system would ultimately fall within this section of the Code and therefore make any truthful and factual statements about important civil and national issues indictable offences.
What must be clearly understood from the start when discussing the issue of ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws is that the notion of elevating the natural emotional feeling of hatred into a pseudo-legal category wherein it becomes an indictable offence is purely an invention of the Zionist Jews and in certain respects an historical concomitant of the Bolshevik era’s Leninist/Stalinist totalitarian terror regimes. One could rightly state that its essential character is embodied in such classics of ‘hate’ literature as Germany Must Perish!, a book written back in 1941 by the Jewish author Theodore N. Kaufman with the sole purpose of inciting America to hate Germany and then translate that hatred into the USA joining the Allies in their unjust war against the National Socialist government of Germany.
EyeOnFreeSpeech600
In a previous article entitled Canada: Hypocrite Nation Ruled by Zionist Deception & anti-Free Speech Laws I had the following to say about these despicable, sham legal subterfuges disguised as legitimate jurisprudence:
‘The war to silence Canadians and stymie any public speech that the Jewish lobby felt might negatively impact them or Israel in any way (either on or off the internet), gained its foothold back in 1977 when the federal government first implemented the so-called Canadian Human Rights Act and created its attendant enforcement agencies, the Canadian Human Rights Commission and the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal (CHRT). Both the commission and the tribunal were quasi-judicial, i.e. ‘crazy’ judicial in that they basically set their own rules and guidelines and consistently changed the ‘legal’ goal posts depending upon whatever case they were dealing with, in order to ensure a conviction. If fact, of the hundreds of Canadians dragged before these Stalinist style ‘Show Trial’ tribunals, EVERYONE was found guilty for the simple reason that all it took was for someone to register a complain against them and that, in itself, sealed their fate. When I describe Section 13 as a ‘Bolshevik’ type law I do so with the full knowledge that under the former Soviet system, Lenin, in one of the regime’s very first acts upon gaining absolute power, was to make ‘anti-Semitism’ a crime punishable by death. Death, that is, without so much as a trial even. All it would take, (just as with the Section 13 ‘complaints’) was for someone to accuse another of said crime and the Cheka (soviet secret police) had the excuse to liquidate the victim.’
Reporting on this issue in Christian News Heather Clark remarks that apart from the criminal aspects of this proposed legislation there are those like Charles McVety, president of the Institute for Canadian Values and others who consider the bill to be ‘nebulous and reckless.’
Clark’s article goes on, ‘Bill C-16 is so vague, it is unenforceable,’ he [McVety] said in a statement. ‘The fluid nature of gender identity is so nebulous that people can change their gender identity moment by moment. In that the bill seeks to change the Criminal Code of Canada, people may be sent to prison for two years over something that is ill-defined, and indeterminable.’
‘It is also reckless as the proposed law will establish universal protection for any man who wishes to access women’s bathrooms or girls’ showers with momentary gender fluidity,’ McVety continued. ‘Every Member of Parliament should examine their conscience over the potential of their vote exposing women and girls to male genitalia.’
JewShitter
In the context of our Charter rights Clark says, ‘There is also uncertainty as to how the law will be applied to free speech. As previously reported, in 2013, the Supreme Court of Canada upheld the conviction of activist William Whatcott, who found himself in hot water after distributing flyers regarding the Bible’s prohibitions against homosexuality throughout the Saskatoon and Regina neighborhoods in 2001 and 2002.’
Bill-Whatcott-Image
As Charles McVety rightfully stated the proposed Bill C-16 is definitely ‘nebulous and reckless’ but as past convictions in both the cases of Section 13 of the Canadian Human Rights Act and Section 319(2) of the Canadian Criminal Code show, simply because it’s ‘vague’ doesn’t mean that it isn’t ‘enforceable’. All it takes are judges and justices within the Canadian judicial system who will interpret and lend credence to subjective definitions of nebulous terms such as ‘hatred’ so that they may then shapeshift into whatever meaning the Crown wishes in order to fit the charge. No better example currently exists than the latest and most severe case of Whatcott.
Conclusion: What’s coming next?
During the heated Sec. 13 Campaign here in Canada when the Canadian Human Rights Act was being wielded like a club by the Canadian Human Rights Commission and bloggers around the country were being bludgeoned and jailed, fined and nailed to the ‘hate crime’ cross the Zionist element within the Conservative Right finally realized that the Sec. 13 legislation no longer was serving just their purposes but was being turned against them as well. As a result they garnered the support of Canada’s Zionist media monopoly and the lobbying to repeal the specious section of the Act was eventually accomplished back in June of 2012. Unfortunately they weren’t smart enough to realize that the ‘Hate Propaganda’ laws within the Criminal Code were even more insidious than Sec. 13. They figured that as long as Sec. 319(2) of the ccc was there and could be used against critics of Israel and anyone else accused of ‘anti-Semitism’ then that was just fine with them. To hell (or jail) with ‘freedom of speech’ if it meant allowing bloggers to speak openly and frankly about the Jews or the Zionist empire builders.
But the tables appear to be turning once again as the new Liberal government of Justin Trudeau begins forcing their faggot philosophy down the throats of unwilling Canadians and then, on top of that monumental insult, threatens the nation with increased criminal penalties of up to two years in jail for anyone who doesn’t want to go happily and gayly along down the road to Sodom and Gomorrah carrying their little rainbow flag in hand.
Will they eventually start campaigning to repeal these anti-free speech laws contained in Sec. 318 to 320 of the Criminal Code and get rid of the last vestiges of Orwellian censorship in Canada?
Time will soon tell.
——
SUPPORTFREEDOMOFSPEECH
The upcoming challenge to this Zionist-created false flag legislation will determine once and for all whether or not Canada will adhere to the spirit and intent of its Charter of Rights and Freedoms or continue to bow down to foreign interests and sacrificing its citizen’s fundamental rights.
Please try to assist in this process by making a small donation to the cause. My GoGetFunding site can be found here: http://gogetfunding.com/canadian-publisher-faces-jail-for-political-writings/
Standing for Canada and our democratic ideals I remain,
Sincerely,
Arthur Topham
Pub/Ed
The Radical Press
Canada’s Radical News Network
‘Digging to the root of the issues since 1998’

[Editor’s Note: Bravo to Monika Schaefer for displaying the courage and will to expose the “6 Million” Holohoax lie for what it truly was – the prime deception of the 20th century and one that has been the cause of endless war and censorship and repressive “hate crime” legislation throughout western nations. 

If only more German-Canadians would speak out THE TRUTH will set us free!]

Normally I wouldn’t subject you to two columns in a row about Canadian goings-on, but I see my new topic has already been deemed worthy of attention here, at ‘The Week That Perished.’
‘Canada Proposes Imprisonment for Anti-Tranny ‘Hate Speech’’ topped the list:
Trudeau is pushing a bill that would protect Canada’s eternally vulnerable transgender community by sending offenders to prison for up to two years if they dare commit the unpardonable sin of uttering ‘anti-transgender speech.’
(And before you scroll down to the comments to lecture me on your clearly overrated First Amendment, American readers should bear in mind that New York state, for one, already has similar laws on the books, and they carry fines of up to $250,000. And this Oregon ‘transmasculine’ teacher got $60,000 because her colleagues wouldn’t refer to ‘it’ as ‘they.’)
No, the Canadian law hasn’t been passed yet, but Trudeau’s Liberals have a majority in Parliament, so they can theoretically shove through any law they want to. The Grits’ priorities are weed, ‘green’ bullshit, assisted suicide, and, well, another kind of ‘assisted suicide’: fighting on the ‘Allies’ side in ‘World War T.’ When it comes to chicks with dicks, the Libs are determined to dress on the right (that is, left) side of history.
‘Soon we’ll all be obligated by law to say and think the same thing—or else. I choose door No. 2.’
(Then again, so are the Conservatives. At their convention last weekend, the party voted overwhelmingly to drop their official opposition to gay ‘marriage,’ quoting—apparently without irony—their former nemesis PM Pierre Trudeau’s maxim that ‘the state has no place in the bedrooms of the nation.’)
More proof that we normals are losing this fight? Trannies are rewriting not just the laws of the nation(s) but of politics and other facets of society. You know the old saw about ‘a dead girl or a live boy’? Well, as Gavin McInnes reported here, the guy behind the North Carolina bathroom bill is a registered sex offender who ‘fondled a 15-year-old boy when he was 20.’ And…Bruce Springsteen and his fellow state-boycotters either haven’t heard or don’t care.
A few leftists break rank and declare their exasperation with all things ‘trans.’ Articles like ‘My Dad Was Transgender. Why I Still Think Gender Can’t Be Changed’ appear with semi-regularity. Activists admit they’ve been pulling our every remaining dangling appendage this whole time:
‘We know trans people are one of the most targeted groups. And they experience violence at a much higher rate than other people,’ he said.
‘But because we don’t collect data, we don’t collect information on these circumstances, it makes it difficult to put in place any programming or training for police or communities that address these crimes.’
None of that matters.
Instead, Canada’s largest newspaper, and one major private broadcaster, have recently been celebrating this ‘transgendered dad’ (and longtime human toothache) who ‘breastfeeds.’ If you’ve got a dodgy gag reflex, you’d best skip over the ‘how,’ although listening to the anchor declare, ‘It’s a wonderful story and I appreciate you coming on and telling us about it,’ is just about as puke-inducing.
Soon we’ll all be obligated by law to say and think the same thing—or else. I choose door No. 2.
I’ve said for years that transsexuals are delusional amputation fetishists, and way too many are manipulative narcissistic bullies and liars, and often prone to violence.
That if they really do commit suicide in epidemic numbers, that’s because, well, they’re clearly insane.
Trannies were cute and funny when they were in movies once in a while—hell, I actually watch The Prancing Elites sometimes, because (I dare you) it’s kind of hard not to—but now they’re everywhere, and I’m sick of them.
I’d compare trannies to kudzu, but kudzu turns out to be mostly a rural legend, whereas trannies are a for-real creeping menace, spreading mendacity and extortion across the land and costing taxpayers untold millions.
To stick with the Southern Gothic metaphor, though, trannies are more like Max Cady in drag. The villain in Cape Fear skirts (pun intended) around the law relentlessly, never doing anything you can actually arrest (or better yet, kill) him for. His mission: to destroy a normal, law-abiding family—precisely because they are normal and law-abiding—in a twisted, selfish campaign for ‘justice.’
This is the part where I’m supposed to cuck out and put in that transsexuals are clearly mentally ill and deserve our compassion. That they’re being exploited as exotic human pets and fashion accessories by everyone from teenage weirdos on Tumblr (forgivable) to powerful media gatekeepers, greedy surgeons, and political power-grabbers (not).
Yeah, fuck that. I don’t care.
In order to ostensibly protect ‘transgender and other gender-diverse’ individuals, the new Canadian law criminalizes ‘hate propaganda and hate crimes.’ So how’s this?
I hate trannies. I think other people should hate trannies, too.
Does that work?
Hate is just a human emotion. If gays are allowed to tear apart and (ineptly) rebuild 5,000 years of civilization in the name of ‘love,’ why shouldn’t I be allowed to stomp on their sand castles in the name of ‘hate’?
At this juncture, I’ll get lectured by conservatives that ‘we’ don’t believe in breaking the law. That if we object to an unjust piece of legislation, we’re supposed to work diligently to overturn it blah blah soooo sleepy zzzzzzzz…
The left has gotten every item on their agenda over the past 60 years through the ‘Rosa Parks’ model. As my fellow Canadian blogger Kate McMillian likes to say, ‘‘Not showing up to riot’ is a failed conservative policy.’
I dare the police to arrest me first the day this law is passed. If they don’t do so spontaneously, then I challenge some chippy little tranny to press charges.
I can’t possibly plead ‘not guilty.’ I won’t even insist that I was ‘just citing statistics’ or ‘performing a thought experiment’ or ‘being satirical.’ Those are all typical (and irregularly effective) defenses in situations like this one. They also don’t apply here.
I have no defense. I don’t even want one.
Come and get me, you fairies.
When I get out, you’ll be able to stick me right back in again, because by then Justin & Co. will also have ‘outlawed Islamophobia.’
So let’s see if you have the balls.

Anti-war MP George Galloway leader of the Respect party in Britain
______________________________________________________
[Editor Note: Thanks to Charles Tupper for sending along this amazing video of yet another Mossad/Israeli/Zionist front organization out to tell Canada government and the people of Canada who the hell can come here and speak on issues of concern to Canadians! WHAT A DISGUSTING PILE OF BIGOTRY AND HYPOCRISY BY MP HARPER AND THE CONSERVATIVE GOVERMENT!!!
As Michael Rivero of http://whatreallyhappened.com rightly states:
The decision to ban George Galloway from Canada seems odd, but now it emerges that the Jewish Defence League (JDL) pressured the Canadian Government to do so. The action takes on sinister connotations for Canada, why? Because the Jewish Defence League are according to the FBI a Terrorist Group. In its report, Terrorism 2000/2001, the FBI referred to the JDL as a ‘violent extremist Jewish organization’. This ‘violent extremist Jewish organization’ now it seems has power and influence over the Canadian Government.
Canadians are just waking up to the fact that Israel controls their government just as much as it does the USA. And note that inevitably, the Israeli shill has to fall back on the Holocaust to try to bludgeon his way through Galloway’s arguments. The good point is watching the Israeli whore thrashing around and clearly aware that he is losing the war for legitimacy in the public eye.]
Canada ban Irish MP: Galloway faces his Jewish Defence League (JDL) ‘Terrorist’ accuser
PLEASE WATCH THIS AMAZING YOU TUBE OF THE ZIONIST THUG TRYING TO JUSTIFY HIS POSITION AND SPEAK FOR CANADIANS!!!

—————————
http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/mar/20/george-galloway-banned-canada
George Galloway banned from Canada
Anti-war MP banned on grounds of national security
‘This idiotic ban shames Canada,’ says Galloway
By Deborah Summers and agencies

Friday 20 March 2009
George Galloway: branded the decision ‘irrational, inexplicable and an affront to Canada’s good name’.
Anti-war MP George Galloway has been banned from Canada, it emerged today.
A Canadian spokesman confirmed that the Respect MP had been deemed inadmissible on national security grounds and would not be allowed into the country.
Galloway today branded the ban ‘idiotic’ and vowed to fight the ruling with ‘all means’ at his disposal. He is due to give a speech in Toronto on 30 March.
Earlier today the Sun said border security officials had declared Galloway, 54, ‘inadmissible’ because of his views on Afghanistan and the presence of Canadian troops there and would be turned away if he attempted to enter the country.
A spokesman for Citizenship and Immigration Canada said the decision had been taken by border security officials ‘based on a number of factors’ in accordance with section 34(1) of the country’s immigration act.
The act states:
‘A permanent resident or a foreign national is inadmissible on security grounds for:
(a) engaging in an act of espionage or an act of subversion against a democratic government, institution or process as they are understood in Canada;
(b) engaging in or instigating the subversion by force of any government;
(c) engaging in terrorism;
(d) being a danger to the security of Canada;
(e) engaging in acts of violence that would or might endanger the lives or safety of persons in Canada; or
(f) being a member of an organisation that there are reasonable grounds to believe engages, has engaged or will engage in acts referred to in paragraph (a), (b) or (c).’
Galloway, MP for Bethnal Green and Bow, is consulting the organisers of his north American speaking tour and exploring whether legal action can be taken to overturn the ban.
Jason Kenney, Canada’s immigration minister, has the right to exempt people from the act if it is felt that their presence would not be ‘detrimental to the national interest’.
But a spokesman said Kenney would ‘decline to exercise that discretion’ in Galloway’s case.
Alykhan Velshi, Kenney’s spokesman, said that the act was designed to protect Canadians from people who fund, support or engage in terrorism.
‘We’re going to uphold the law, not give special treatment to this infamous street-corner Cromwell who actually brags about giving ‘financial support’ to Hamas, a terrorist organisation banned in Canada,’ he said. ‘I’m sure Galloway has a large Rolodex of friends in regimes elsewhere in the world willing to roll out the red carpet for him. Canada, however, won’t be one of them.’
Responding to the news, Galloway issued a statement headed: ‘This idiotic ban shames Canada.’
The MP said: ‘This decision, gazetted in Rupert Murdoch’s Sun, is a very sad day for the Canada we have known and loved a bastion of the freedoms that supporters of the occupation of Afghanistan claim to be defending.
‘This has further vindicated the anti-war movement’s contention that unjust wars abroad will end up consuming the very liberties that make us who we are.
‘This may be a rather desperate election ploy by a conservative government reaching the end of line, or by a minister who has not cottoned on to the fact that the George Bush era is over.
‘All right-thinking Canadians, whether they agree with me over the wisdom of sending troops to Afghanistan or not, will oppose this outrageous decision.
‘On a personal note for a Scotsman to be barred from Canada is like being told to stay away from the family home.
‘This is not something I’m prepared to accept.’
Galloway is due to speak at a public forum entitled Resisting War from Gaza to Kandahar, hosted by the Toronto Coalition to Stop the War later this month.
He is also due to speak at a second public forum in Mississauga, west of Toronto, on 31 March.
His proposed visit prompted the Jewish Defence League of Canada to write an open letter to the country’s government urging it to do ‘everything possible to keep this hater away’.
————-
http://www.cbc.ca/canada/story/2009/03/20/galloway-ban-canada-kenney.html
British MP barred from Canada
Friday, March 20, 2009 |
CBC News
[First part a repeat of article above and snipped here. Ed.]
Opposition questions ban
Liberal Leader Michael Ignatieff, speaking to reporters after a speech in Winnipeg Friday, said while he’s no fan of Galloway, people can’t be banned from Canada for what they may say.
‘If he is being barred on free speech grounds that is an outrage,’ said Ignatieff. ‘He can come to Canada and talk rubbish all day long as far as I’m concerned.’
But Ignatieff said Canadian security officials may know something he doesn’t.
‘If there is a security threat, that is another matter,’ he said.
NDP immigration critic Olivia Chow said the Conservatives have a pattern of suppressing those who have contradictory views.
‘The minister of immigration is becoming the minister of censorship,’ Chow told Canadian Press. ‘We don’t have to agree with everything Mr. Galloway talks about.
‘But, at bare minimum, they should be allowed to express their points of view so Canadians can make decisions themselves. This is pure censorship and it’s wrong.’
Jewish groups pleased
Jewish organizations B’nai Brith and the Canadian Jewish Congress applauded the decision.
FrankDimantBB
B’nai Brith’s executive vice-president, Frank Dimant
________________________________________________
‘We applaud the government for its explicit recognition that individuals who glorify terrorism and promote hatred be denied access into Canada,’ said a statement from B’nai Brith’s executive vice-president, Frank Dimant.
Bernie Farber, CEO of the Canadian Jewish Congress, wrote: ‘George Galloway enables terrorism. In so doing he puts Canadian civilians at risk and comforts those who fight our soldiers in Afghanistan. The government’s decision was the right one from legal, security and moral viewpoints.’
Galloway was expelled from the Labour party in 2003 after publicly lashing out against British involvement in the Iraq war. Labour party officials said Galloway’s comments ‘incited foreign forces to rise up against British troops.’
He later helped form the anti-war Respect party.

Dear Friends,
Once upon a time when Facebook first came online in 2004, it was an environment that allowed a robust sharing of views. Christians, feminists, communists, National Socialists, Buddhists, atheists, homosexual activists and just about everyone else were free to say their piece. I recall ‘community standards’ were in place early on, but they weren’t used to censor viewpoints back then. In the beginning I remember Facebook did censor some things that most reasonable people would agree should be censored in a public forum where children are present. Pornography and graphic, gratuitous violence was censored on Facebook back then. Those days are over.
In recent years Conservatives have been complaining that the enforcement of Facebook’s community standards seem to be slanted against them. News that favours conservative viewpoints tends not to trend while news favorable to liberals always trends. People who are vocal in favour of the pro-life and pro-family viewpoint seem to have their accounts shut down for saying very little, while left wing pages containing all sorts of vulgarity and hate speech remain accessible on Facebook.
This week Facebook released a public statement at the conclusion of their investigation of themselves for bias against conservatives saying, ‘we were unable to substantiate any of the specific allegations of politically-motivated suppression of subjects or sources, as reported in the media.’
Facebook’s deletion of my account is clear evidence of bias against socially conservative viewpoints. What should also be concerning for Christians and parents who care about what their children are exposed to is what Facebook is no longer banning ie: pornography and graphic snuff films.
In my view Facebook has actually become a politically correct sewer. Unfortunately, breaking away from the sewer might be too much work for North America’s psychologically and spiritually emasculated Christians. I note many Christian charities chose to keep their PayPal accounts, even after the anti-Christian Jewish CEO of PayPal, Dan Schulman tried to punish the Christian governor of North Carolina by closing PayPal’s call center in the state to protest the passing of a law prohibiting transvestite males from accessing women’s and girls bathrooms and change rooms.
Closing a PayPal account is only a minor inconvenience. I closed mine and it has barely effected my ability to do online shopping or send and receive money, as many options exist. Facebook on the other hand is the premier social media tool with which people are dependent on to communicate with friends and acquaintances. Many Christian charities, lobby groups and churches rely on Facebook as an important modicum for advertising and getting their messages out to supporters and the wider community.
The reality is more than a billion people and millions of organizations, businesses and charities (many of them Christian and conservative) are dependent on Facebook for their communicating. While Facebook is not banning every Christian from its platform it has shown a consistent pattern of selectively deleting posts and banning individuals and groups, especially if they are outspoken on the topics of immigration, Islam, abortion, homosexuality and transgenderism. The anti-Christian and socially liberal multi-billionaire Mark Zuckerberg was caught on an open microphone promising German Chancellor Angela Merkel that he would censor posts on Facebook that were critical of her open door, mass immigration policy; a policy that many reasonable people realize is leading Germany to a cultural and social breakdown. Facebook’s bias and censorship is a problem and I would suggest Christians and conservatives need to put some serious effort into either finding or creating new social media platforms that are able to become popular and are less hostile to their values.
Some of the mainstream media are claiming the accusations of censorship leveled at Facebook are either overblown or lacking evidence. In my little world I will demonstrate one act of banning by Facebook’s censors and two instances where they chose not to ban and you can draw your own conclusion.
On Facebook graphic pornography now seems to be ok.
A left leaning ex-Facebook friend of mine actually reported a pornographic post and Facebook account. The fellow is no ideological friend of mine, he supports homosexual rights, abortion and legalized drug use. None the less, I communicated with the fellow off and on and it seems he did not want unsolicited pornography posted in his group, so when a spammer posted porn he reported it.
Here is a censored version of what my left leaning friend and others in his group was exposed to:
Facebookporn_zpswoubhpsz
If you are still skeptical, here is the offending Facebook page after it was reported. My friend says he got a message that this account ‘Does not violate community standards.’ It is still up for the world to see. (Warning this page is pornographic) and probably fake:
https://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id … 44&fref=ts
I don’t recommend looking at his, her, its Facebook page unless you have doubts about the veracity of my censored pic. What you will see on the page is pornographic films and what appears to be a fake account. Facebook reviewed this account and even though the account is a porn spammer and likely isn’t even the person it is claiming to be, Facebook decided this account and its habit of sending out unsolicited porn ‘Does not violate community standards.’
While I have never reported offensive views or arguments from leftists or homosexuals, I reported this Facebook account below when I was a member in good standing a few months months back. I don’t recommend following the link below unless you really feel the need to verify what I am saying is true. This fellow uses his Facebook account to post spam, promising fake internet jobs in the comments section of the National Post. When I went to his account to report the spam he was sending, I came across this horrific video of a woman getting her stomach cut open. The video was sufficiently horrific I did not finish watching it. I took this picture partway through so you can get an idea what Facebook now allows without exposing yourself to the actual video. I was informed a day later the video ‘Does not offend community standards.’
20160524_153206_zpsyqdtmxqm
The account is here and the video is about 3 months back (warning graphic violence): https://www.facebook.com/dlsahad.zebari
Then there is my post. My post contains arguments that transgenderism is the promotion of falsehood, that the pro-life movement should remain opposed to homosexuality and transgenderism if they are going to be faithful in upholding the culture of life and bible verses. There is no threats, no spam, no porn. True my post could be offensive to homosexual activists and leftists. But doesn’t pornography and graphic violence offend people too? Here is the verbatim post I made before my Facebook account was permanently deactivated:
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=10512
Whether you agree with my post or not, it is 100% views and for Facebook to resort to account deactivation for my post and yet allow posts that contain violence, profanity and pornography is hypocritical.
Historically freedom of speech has been protected to insure unpopular arguments could be heard and considered. Freedom of speech was never intended to protect the dissemination of pornography or gratuitous violence. Pornographic and snuff films contain no philosophical message, they are simply used for masturbation and lead to personal, family, spiritual, and societal decay.
At any rate I have diversified my own online presence as I am on VK.com and I have my own site http://www.freenorthamerica.ca where censorship is mostly non-existent (except porn, actual spam, harassment or bullying.) Notwithstanding my own attempts to have channels of communication independent of Facebook, at this time I recognize Facebook is big and influential, regardless of my attempts to encourage social conservatives to minimize their dependency on this hostile entity.
To that end I requested that my good friend and lawyer Tom Schuck serve Facebook’s legal counsel with a demand letter that my account be reinstated and that Facebook cease from its censorship of Christian conservatives. While Facebook claims to be private, we should note Facebook has been supportive of governments forcing Christian bakers to bake homosexual wedding cakes and photographers to take pictures of homosexual weddings even if the said business owners believe this is wrong and contrary to their conscience.
The Christian businesses that typically decline homosexual wedding cakes and photo shoots are small and have no capacity to significantly influence public opinions or elections. Facebook on the other hand is huge. Its net worth is now larger than Walmart’s ($245 Billion) and unlike Walmart, Facebook has proven it has the ability to shape public opinion and even destabilize national governments.
Facebook was recognized by Business Insider as being instrumental in helping the Euromaidan protesters overthrow the Ukraine’s government in 2014. Republicans and Democrats alike are aware the battle for undecided voters in the upcoming election will be waged heavily on Facebook. Germany’s Chancellor Merkel was sufficiently unnerved by the protests of Germany’s citizens who took to Facebook to denounce her immigration policies, she asked Zuckerberg to censor her country’s anti-mass immigration movement and he did.
Surely if Christian bakeries with one employee and a net worth of under $100,000 have to face government scrutiny because the occasional homosexual has to go a block further down the street to get their queer wedding cake, then surely Jewish owned Facebook should be answerable when they exercise their power to censor of millions of conservative users, destabilize governments, and affect the outcomes of elections. Ideally, it would be even better if Christians and conservatives decided the censorship of Christian values and promotion of perversity by Facebook was unacceptable voted with their mouse pads to go elsewhere.
In Christ’s Service
Bill Whatcott
‘Let God be true though every one were a liar, as it is written,
‘That you may be justified in your words,
and prevail when you are judged.’’
Romans 3:4